High

pyload-ng: getUserData/get_userdata exposed at Perms.ANY allow any authenticated account to brute-force the administrator password

  • Disclosed: 09.10.2026
  • Updated: 11.10.2026 15:18

Summary

Api.getUserData (legacy) and Api.get_userdata are declared with @permission(Perms.ANY) and are reachable at /api/getUserData and /api/get_userdata. Because Perms.ANY == 0 and pyLoad's permission check is a bitmask AND, that gate is a no-op: every authenticated account passes, including one holding zero permission bits.

Both methods are thin wrappers around check_auth(), which the maintainers deliberately restricted to administrators by omitting @permission (no entry in perm_map, so is_authorized() returns False for non-admins). The wrappers undo that protection.

An attacker holding the lowest-privileged account in the system therefore has a clean binary oracle on the administrator password, with no account lockout anywhere in the codebase, and with the 100 req/min rate limiter bypassable by rotating X-Forwarded-For.

Affected code

src/pyload/core/api/__init__.py:1446 and :1464

python
    #: Old API
    @permission(Perms.ANY)
    @get
    def getUserData(self, username: str, password: str) -> OldUserData:
        """
        similar to `check_auth` but returns UserData type.
        """
        user = self.check_auth(username, password)
        ...

    @permission(Perms.ANY)
    @get
    def get_userdata(self, username: str, password: str) -> UserData:
        user = self.check_auth(username, password)
        ...

Root cause

src/pyload/core/api/__init__.py:57

python
class Perms(IntFlag):
    ANY = 0  #: requires no permission, but login

src/pyload/core/api/__init__.py:108

python
def has_permission(user_perms: Perms, required_perms: Perms):
    return required_perms == (user_perms & required_perms)

For required_perms == 0 this evaluates to 0 == (user_perms & 0) → 0 == 0 → always True. The @permission(Perms.ANY) gate therefore admits every authenticated principal regardless of which permission bits they hold.

Contrast with the intended admin-only primitive, src/pyload/core/api/__init__.py:1396:

python
    @legacy("checkAuth")
    @get
    def check_auth(self, username: str, password: str) -> dict[str, Any]:

check_auth has no @permission; is_authorized() at api/__init__.py:1430 returns False for non-admins. The two wrappers carry Perms.ANY and restore access for everyone.

Because both wrappers also carry @get, they are placed in method_map and are directly routable via /api/<func>.

Amplifiers

1. No lockout. There is no failed-login counter, delay, or ban anywhere in the codebase. A failed guess costs the attacker only one PBKDF2 computation.

2. Rate limiting is bypassable. /api/* applies rate_limit(count=100, period=60) (src/pyload/webui/app/blueprints/api_blueprint.py:25), which buckets on a fully client-controlled header (src/pyload/webui/app/helpers.py:446):

python
client_ip = flask.request.headers.get("X-Forwarded-For", "").split(",")[0].strip() \
    or flask.request.remote_addr

Rotating X-Forwarded-For per request yields a fresh bucket each time. Notably, is_loopback_request() in the same file (helpers.py:288-294) explicitly treats the presence of X-Forwarded-For / X-Real-IP / Forwarded as untrustworthy — the same guard was evidently not applied inside rate_limit().

Impact

Online brute force of the administrator account leading to full administrative takeover. A successful response additionally discloses the target account's id, name, email, role, and permission bits.

Proof of concept

Verified against 0.5.0b3, commit a5b008958.

Setup: stock instance with admin pyload, plus a non-admin user bob created with role=USER and permission=0.

Step 1 — establish that bob is genuinely unprivileged:

GET /api/checkAuth?username=pyload&password=pyload   ->  401 {"error": "Access denied"}
GET /api/getAllUserData                              ->  401 {"error": "Access denied"}

Step 2 — the flaw. Same user, same session, Perms.ANY gate:

GET /api/getUserData?username=pyload&password=WRONG
  -> 200 {"name": null, "email": null, "role": null, "permission": null, "template_name": null}

GET /api/getUserData?username=pyload&password=pyload
  -> 200 {"name": "pyload", "email": "", "role": 0, "permission": 0, "template_name": "default"}

role: 0 is Role.ADMIN. get_userdata behaves identically. This is a perfect yes/no oracle.

Step 3 — measured brute force and recovery. Run as bob (permission = 0), admin password set to a 2-character value, X-Forwarded-For rotated on every request:

attempts         : 667
elapsed          : 39.7s   (16.8 guesses/sec)
429 rate-limits  : 0
account lockout  : NONE - same session authenticated throughout
RECOVERED SECRET : 'zq'   (true value 'zq')   match=True

Step 4 — full takeover with the recovered secret:

POST /login as pyload/<recovered>       ->  HTTP 302  (authenticated as admin)
GET  /api/getAllUserData (admin-only)  ->  HTTP 200  (full user dump)

Measured throughput is 17-47 guesses/sec/thread. The only bound is PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA256 at 100,000 iterations in src/pyload/core/database/user_database.py:14, not any rate limit.

Suggested remediation

  • Remove @permission(Perms.ANY) from getUserData and get_userdata, or drop them entirely — they are legacy compatibility shims, and modern callers already use the admin-only check_auth.
  • Structurally: Perms.ANY = 0 makes has_permission() vacuous, so any method decorated @permission(Perms.ANY) silently becomes public to every logged-in user. Give ANY a real bit value, or handle it explicitly in has_permission() as "requires an authenticated session".
  • Do not trust X-Forwarded-For unless a trusted-proxy deployment is explicitly configured. Otherwise bucket rate_limit() on request.remote_addr, or add the same guard is_loopback_request() already uses.
  • Add per-account failed-authentication throttling or lockout.
  • Consider hmac.compare_digest() in _check_password() (src/pyload/core/database/user_database.py:61 uses a plain == on the derived hash, contradicting the "always use compare_digest" guidance two files away).

Notes for triage

There is no 0.5.0b3 release on PyPI. The develop branch auto-publishes dev builds (setup.py:86 appends .dev<build> to the VERSION file); the newest at time of testing was 0.5.0b3.dev101. The Perms.ANY = 0 design is long-standing, but only the 0.5.0b3.dev* line was verified here — please confirm whether 0.5.0b2.* and 0.4.x are affected before finalizing the version range.

Affected software

Click a technology to see all vulnerabilities affecting it.

PlatformPackageVulnerable versionsFixed in
Python (PyPI) pyload-ng >= 0.5.0b3.dev1, <= 0.5.0b3.dev101 no fix

References

CVSS score 8.1/10
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Weakness (CWE)
CWE-287
Platform
Python (PyPI)
Package
pyload-ng
Disclosed
09.10.2026
Updated
11.10.2026 15:18

Sources and licenses

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-68w4-83fh-f2w8 - CC BY 4.0

Vulnerability history: pyload-ng

All published vulnerabilities of this package (Python (PyPI)), newest first. Shows whether this is a one-off slip or a package that needs watching.

All (58) in the archive
Total entries
58
First → latest
01.2023 10.2026
Without a fix
24
Exploited in attacks
0

Severity breakdown

  • Critical 9
  • High 23
  • Medium 25
  • Low 1

Disclosures per year

  1. 2023: 9
  2. 2024: 8
  3. 2025: 8
  4. 2026: 33
Severity:
  1. pyload-ng: getUserData/get_userdata exposed at Perms.ANY allow any authenticated account to brute-force the administrator password this entry
    High · 8.1 ghsa-68w4-83fh-f2w8 >= 0.5.0b3.dev1, <= 0.5.0b3.dev101 no fix
  2. High · 7.5 ghsa-889w-m37p-88m5 >= 0.5.0b3.dev98, <= 0.5.0b3.dev101 no fix
  3. High · 8.1 ghsa-r44w-v6gf-x3p6 < 0.5.0b3.dev101 0.5.0b3.dev101
  4. High · 8.1 CVE-2026-42315 < 0.5.0b3.dev100 0.5.0b3.dev100
  5. High · 8.8 CVE-2026-35463 <= 0.5.0b3.dev96 no fix
  6. High · 7.7 CVE-2026-35187 <= 0.5.0b3.dev96 no fix
  7. High · 7.1 CVE-2026-29778 >= 0.5.0b3.dev13, < 0.5.0b3.dev97 0.5.0b3.dev97
  8. High · 8.1 CVE-2025-61773 < 0.5.0b3.dev91 0.5.0b3.dev91
  9. High CVE-2025-57751 < 0.5.0b3.dev92 0.5.0b3.dev92
Show more (12) Showing 20 of 32

Know which vulnerabilities affect your application

With the DockRay integration and software inventory enabled, DockRay checks reported component versions against known vulnerabilities and notifies you about confirmed matches. Coverage depends on the supported technology and available advisory data.

Connect your application
DockRay newsletter

Application security in your inbox

Important vulnerabilities, actionable guidance and practical advice for your applications. Choose your technologies and follow what matters to your project.

  • A daily digest of new vulnerabilities, critical ones included.
  • Notifications about important updates.
  • Practical advice on application security and monitoring.

Leave empty to receive updates for every technology.

Free to subscribe. Unsubscribe with one click in any email.