Medium

django CMS: Broken access control in page *Duplicate* allows reading the content of any page (cross-site / restriction bypass)

  • Disclosed: 20.08.2026
  • Updated: 11.10.2026 15:18

Impact

The only authorization gate on the duplicate flow is PageAdmin.has_add_permission, which checks user_can_add_page(user, site) / user_can_add_subpage(...) — i.e. “may this user create a page at all”. Nothing checks the user’s relationship to the page being copied:

  • cms/admin/forms.py — DuplicatePageForm.source = ModelChoiceField(queryset=Page.objects.all(), widget=HiddenInput()) spans every page in the database, on every site.
  • cms/admin/forms.py — AddPageForm.__init__ returns early when the source widget is hidden, so the queryset is never narrowed to the user’s site/subtree.
  • cms/admin/forms.py — AddPageForm.clean() validates only URL uniqueness; source is never validated against the user.
  • cms/admin/pageadmin.py — duplicate() seeds source from the URL only on GET; on POST the value comes entirely from the request body.
  • cms/admin/forms.py — AddPageForm.save() → from_source() performs source.copy(..., permissions=False) and copies every placeholder and all plugins of source into a new page on the attacker’s site. Because permissions=False drops the source’s view restrictions, the resulting copy is fully readable by the attacker.

This crosses a real privilege boundary: a staff user restricted (via CMS_PERMISSION) to their own site or subtree can exfiltrate the content of restricted pages and of pages belonging to other tenants.

Read-back is trivial (verified): the copy is created on the attacker’s site and, because copy(..., permissions=False) strips the source’s view restrictions, the new page is unrestricted. user_can_view_page() then returns True for it (unrestricted + PUBLIC_FOR), so the attacker — or even an anonymous visitor — can read the duplicated content directly from the front end. No further permission on the new page is required.

Proof of concept

  1. Log in as a staff user attacker who has add page permission but no view/change permission on a target (secret / other-site) page SECRET_ID.
  2. Send (the URL <id> only needs to be a PageContent the attacker can already see — e.g. one of their own pages; the victim id goes in the POST body):
http
POST /admin/cms/pagecontent/<MY_OWN_PAGECONTENT_ID>/duplicate/ HTTP/1.1
Cookie: sessionid=<attacker session>
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded

csrfmiddlewaretoken=...&title=x&slug=x&language=en&source=<SECRET_ID>
  1. A new, unrestricted page is created under the attacker’s site containing a verbatim copy of the secret page’s plugins, which the attacker can now preview/edit/read.

Patches

Enforce an object-level permission check on source:

python
class DuplicatePageForm(AddPageForm):
    source = forms.ModelChoiceField(
        queryset=Page.objects.all(),
        required=True,
        widget=forms.HiddenInput(),
    )

    def clean_source(self):
        source = self.cleaned_data.get("source")
        if source and not user_can_view_page(self._user, source):
            raise ValidationError(_("You do not have permission to copy this page."))
        return source

(user_can_view_page is imported from cms.utils.page_permissions.)

Workarounds

Until patched, restrict access to the cms.add_page permission to fully-trusted staff, or disable the duplicate action for delegated/limited editors.

References

  • cms/admin/pageadmin.py — duplicate(), has_add_permission(), get_urls()
  • cms/admin/forms.py — DuplicatePageForm, AddPageForm.__init__/clean/save/from_source
  • Regression tests: cms/tests/test_forms.py::DuplicatePageFormSecurityTestCase

Affected software

Click a technology to see all vulnerabilities affecting it.

PlatformPackageVulnerable versionsFixed in
Python (PyPI) django-cms < 5.0.9 5.0.9

References

CVSS score 6.5/10
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weakness (CWE)
CWE-639, CWE-862
Platform
Python (PyPI)
Package
django-cms
Disclosed
20.08.2026
Updated
11.10.2026 15:18

Sources and licenses

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - PYSEC-2026-3821 - PyPA Advisory Database; CC BY 4.0

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-6x92-6vx4-5fwr - CC BY 4.0

Vulnerability history: django-cms

All published vulnerabilities of this package (Python (PyPI)), newest first. Shows whether this is a one-off slip or a package that needs watching.

All (10) in the archive
Total entries
10
First → latest
08.2017 08.2026
Without a fix
0
Exploited in attacks
0

Severity breakdown

  • High 2
  • Medium 8

Disclosures per year

  1. 2017: 1
  2. 2018: 0
  3. 2019: 0
  4. 2020: 0
  5. 2021: 0
  6. 2022: 1
  7. 2023: 0
  8. 2024: 1
  9. 2025: 0
  10. 2026: 7
Severity:
  1. High · 7.1 CVE-2026-54623 < 5.0.8 5.0.8
  2. django CMS: Broken access control in page *Duplicate* allows reading the content of any page (cross-site / restriction bypass) this entry
    Medium · 6.5 CVE-2026-63003 < 5.0.9 5.0.9

Know which vulnerabilities affect your application

With the DockRay integration and software inventory enabled, DockRay checks reported component versions against known vulnerabilities and notifies you about confirmed matches. Coverage depends on the supported technology and available advisory data.

Connect your application
DockRay newsletter

Application security in your inbox

Important vulnerabilities, actionable guidance and practical advice for your applications. Choose your technologies and follow what matters to your project.

  • A daily digest of new vulnerabilities, critical ones included.
  • Notifications about important updates.
  • Practical advice on application security and monitoring.

Leave empty to receive updates for every technology.

Free to subscribe. Unsubscribe with one click in any email.