High

Lemur has an authorization bypass in StrictRolePermission / AuthorityCreatorPermission

  • Disclosed: 25.06.2026
  • Updated: 11.10.2026 14:17

Summary

StrictRolePermission and AuthorityCreatorPermission in lemur/auth/permissions.py call flask_principal.Permission.__init__() with zero Needs when their config flags are unset. Both flags defaulted to False in code prior to the fix, so this was the state of any Lemur install that hadn't explicitly opted in.

Flask-Principal's Permission.allows() returns True whenever self.needs is empty. The .can() gate therefore passes for every authenticated identity, including the lowest-privilege role Lemur ships (read-only).

A user holding only read-only can create root Certificate Authorities, create and edit notifications (an SSRF sink), create domain entries, and upload arbitrary certificates. These classes are the sole authorization check on those endpoints.

Root Cause

python
# lemur/auth/permissions.py
class AuthorityCreatorPermission(Permission):
    def __init__(self):
        requires_admin = current_app.config.get("ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION", False)
        if requires_admin:
            super().__init__(RoleNeed("admin"))
        else:
            super().__init__()              # empty Need set

class StrictRolePermission(Permission):
    def __init__(self):
        strict_role_enforcement = current_app.config.get("LEMUR_STRICT_ROLE_ENFORCEMENT", False)
        if strict_role_enforcement:
            needs = [RoleNeed("admin"), RoleNeed("operator")]
            super().__init__(*needs)
        else:
            super().__init__()              # empty Need set

flask_principal.Permission.allows() (upstream, v0.4.0):

python
def allows(self, identity):
    if self.needs and not self.needs.intersection(identity.provides):
        return False
    ...
    return True

When self.needs == set(), the first guard is falsy and is skipped. excludes is also empty, so allows() returns True for any identity. AuthenticatedResource (the parent class for these views) sets method_decorators = [login_required], which checks authentication only, no role. So the permission .can() is the only authorization layer in front of these endpoints.

Affected Endpoints

Views whose only authorization check is StrictRolePermission().can() or AuthorityCreatorPermission().can():

Method Path Source
POST /api/1/authorities lemur/authorities/views.py:231
POST /api/1/certificates/upload lemur/certificates/views.py:651
POST /api/1/pending_certificates/<id>/upload lemur/pending_certificates/views.py:545
POST /api/1/notifications lemur/notifications/views.py:227
PUT/DEL /api/1/notifications/<id> lemur/notifications/views.py:370,384
POST /api/1/domains lemur/domains/views.py:131

POST /api/1/authorities is gated by AuthorityCreatorPermission().can() and StrictRolePermission().can(); both have empty Needs by default. The other rows are gated by StrictRolePermission().can() alone.

Note on scope: PUT /api/1/authorities/<id> also references StrictRolePermission, but its gate is AuthorityPermission(...).can() and StrictRolePermission().can(). AuthorityPermission is constructed with non-empty Needs (RoleNeed("admin") plus authority-scoped needs), so that endpoint is not bypassable by a read-only user and is excluded from this report.

Impact

A user holding only the read-only role can:

  1. Create root Certificate Authorities. CA cert and private key are persisted in Lemur's DB with the attacker as owner. Any internal trust store that pins Lemur-managed roots can now be signed against by the attacker.
  2. Upload arbitrary certificates via /certificates/upload, including attacker-supplied keys with destinations such as AWS push.
  3. Create or modify notifications, which reach an SSRF sink (see related finding F3, Slack notification webhook).
  4. Mark arbitrary domains as sensitive, manipulating Lemur's domain registry and the cert-issuance approval path.

Combined with any low-privilege credential leak (phished employee, leaked SSO token) or insider access, this is a pivot from "any authenticated identity" to control of the PKI issuance plane.

Remediation

The config flag defaults for ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION and LEMUR_STRICT_ROLE_ENFORCEMENT were changed from False to True. Restrictive role enforcement is now active on all default installs without requiring explicit configuration.

python
class AuthorityCreatorPermission(Permission):
    def __init__(self):
        requires_admin = current_app.config.get("ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION", True)
        ...

class StrictRolePermission(Permission):
    def __init__(self):
        strict_role_enforcement = current_app.config.get("LEMUR_STRICT_ROLE_ENFORCEMENT", True)
        ...

Note: The opt-out branches (empty Needs) remain in the code. Operators who explicitly set ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION = False or LEMUR_STRICT_ROLE_ENFORCEMENT = False in their config will reintroduce the bypass. These flags should be left unset or set to True.

Affected software

Click a technology to see all vulnerabilities affecting it.

PlatformPackageVulnerable versionsFixed in
Python (PyPI) lemur < 1.9.1 1.9.1

References

CVSS score 8.8/10
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness (CWE)
CWE-863
Platform
Python (PyPI)
Package
lemur
Disclosed
25.06.2026
Updated
11.10.2026 14:17

Sources and licenses

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - PYSEC-2026-2588 - PyPA Advisory Database; CC BY 4.0

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-qcqw-jwxc-2hqg - CC BY 4.0

Vulnerability history: lemur

All published vulnerabilities of this package (Python (PyPI)), newest first. Shows whether this is a one-off slip or a package that needs watching.

All (18) in the archive
Total entries
18
First → latest
08.2017 08.2026
Without a fix
0
Exploited in attacks
0

Severity breakdown

  • Critical 1
  • High 9
  • Medium 8

Disclosures per year

  1. 2017: 1
  2. 2018: 0
  3. 2019: 0
  4. 2020: 0
  5. 2021: 0
  6. 2022: 0
  7. 2023: 1
  8. 2024: 0
  9. 2025: 0
  10. 2026: 16
Severity:
  1. Lemur has an authorization bypass in StrictRolePermission / AuthorityCreatorPermission this entry
    High · 8.8 CVE-2026-48508 < 1.9.1 1.9.1
  2. High · 7.5 CVE-2023-30797 < 1.3.2 1.3.2
  3. High · 7.5 CVE-2015-7764 < 0.1.5 0.1.5

Know which vulnerabilities affect your application

With the DockRay integration and software inventory enabled, DockRay checks reported component versions against known vulnerabilities and notifies you about confirmed matches. Coverage depends on the supported technology and available advisory data.

Connect your application
DockRay newsletter

Application security in your inbox

Important vulnerabilities, actionable guidance and practical advice for your applications. Choose your technologies and follow what matters to your project.

  • A daily digest of new vulnerabilities, critical ones included.
  • Notifications about important updates.
  • Practical advice on application security and monitoring.

Leave empty to receive updates for every technology.

Free to subscribe. Unsubscribe with one click in any email.