Medium

phpMyFAQ has an Authorization Bypass in All Admin Pages Due to Non-Terminating Permission Check

  • Disclosed: 06.05.2026
  • Updated: 11.10.2026 10:22

Summary

AbstractAdministrationController::userHasPermission() catches the ForbiddenException thrown when a user lacks a specific permission, sends a "forbidden" HTML page via $response->send(), but does not terminate execution. The calling controller method continues to execute, fetches protected data, renders the full template, and returns it as a Response. The final $response->send() in admin/index.php outputs the protected page content after the forbidden page, leaking all permission-protected admin data to any authenticated admin user regardless of their actual permissions.

Details

The parent class AbstractController::userHasPermission() (phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/AbstractController.php:317-327) correctly enforces authorization by throwing a ForbiddenException when the user lacks the required permission. This exception would normally propagate to Symfony's HttpKernel exception handler, which would return an error response and prevent the controller from continuing.

However, AbstractAdministrationController overrides this method at line 390-399:

php
#[\Override]
protected function userHasPermission(PermissionType $permissionType): void
{
    try {
        parent::userHasPermission($permissionType);
    } catch (ForbiddenException $exception) {
        $response = $this->getForbiddenPage($exception->getMessage());
        $response->send();  // Outputs HTML but does NOT terminate execution
    } catch (Exception $exception) {
        $this->configuration->getLogger()->error($exception->getMessage());
        // Only logs, no response, no termination
    }
}

The critical flaw: after $response->send() at line 396, there is no exit(), die(), return, or re-throw. PHP execution continues normally into the calling controller method.

For example, in AdminLogController::index() (phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/AdminLogController.php:45-83):

php
public function index(Request $request): Response
{
    $this->userHasPermission(PermissionType::STATISTICS_ADMINLOG);
    // ^^^ If user lacks permission: forbidden page is echoed, but execution continues

    // ... all of this still executes:
    $loggingData = $this->adminLog->getAll();  // Fetches ALL admin log entries
    // ...
    return $this->render('@admin/statistics/admin-log.twig', [
        // ... full admin log data including IPs, usernames, actions
        'loggingData' => $currentItems,
    ]);
}

The entry point admin/index.php then calls $response->send() on the returned Response, appending the full protected page to the already-sent forbidden page in the HTTP response body.

The second catch block (line 397-398) for generic Exception is even worse — it only logs the error without sending any response or terminating, so the protected page renders with no forbidden notice at all.

58 admin controllers extend AbstractAdministrationController and call userHasPermission(), meaning every permission-protected admin page is affected. This includes:

  • Admin logs (user IPs, actions, usernames)
  • User management (user data, permissions)
  • System information (server configuration, PHP info)
  • Configuration pages (all application settings)
  • Backup pages
  • All other admin functionality

PoC

  1. Create a test admin user with minimal permissions (e.g., only FAQ editing, no statistics access):

  2. Authenticate as the limited admin user and request a permission-protected page:

bash
# Get admin session cookies by logging in
curl -c cookies.txt -d 'faqusername=limited_admin&faqpassword=password&pmf-csrf-token=TOKEN' \
  'https://TARGET/admin/?action=login'

# Access admin log page (requires STATISTICS_ADMINLOG permission)
curl -b cookies.txt -s 'https://TARGET/admin/statistics/admin-log' | tee response.html

# The response contains BOTH the forbidden page HTML AND the full admin log:
grep -c 'You are not allowed' response.html    # 1 — forbidden page was sent
grep -c 'loggingData\|ad_adminlog_ip' response.html  # matches — admin log data also present

# Access system information (requires CONFIGURATION_EDIT permission)  
curl -b cookies.txt -s 'https://TARGET/admin/system-information' | tee sysinfo.html
# Contains PHP version, extensions, database info, server configuration
  1. The HTTP response body contains the forbidden page HTML followed by the full protected page HTML, including all sensitive data.

Impact

Any authenticated admin user — even one with zero administrative permissions beyond basic login — can access every permission-protected admin page by simply requesting its URL. The permission check sends a forbidden page but does not stop execution, so the protected content is always appended to the response.

Exposed data includes:

  • Admin logs: All admin users' IP addresses, actions, and timestamps
  • User management: User accounts, email addresses, permissions
  • System information: PHP configuration, database details, server paths
  • Configuration: All application settings including security-sensitive values
  • Backups: Database export functionality

This effectively renders the entire admin permission system non-functional for the 58 page controllers using AbstractAdministrationController.

Recommended Fix

Add return after sending the forbidden response, and re-throw for the generic Exception case:

php
#[\Override]
protected function userHasPermission(PermissionType $permissionType): void
{
    try {
        parent::userHasPermission($permissionType);
    } catch (ForbiddenException $exception) {
        $response = $this->getForbiddenPage($exception->getMessage());
        $response->send();
        exit;  // Terminate execution to prevent controller from continuing
    } catch (Exception $exception) {
        $this->configuration->getLogger()->error($exception->getMessage());
        throw $exception;  // Re-throw to prevent controller from continuing
    }
}

A cleaner architectural fix would be to not swallow the exception at all, and instead let it propagate to the Symfony HttpKernel exception handler (which already handles ForbiddenException via WebExceptionListener):

php
#[\Override]
protected function userHasPermission(PermissionType $permissionType): void
{
    // Simply delegate to parent — let ForbiddenException propagate
    // to the WebExceptionListener which renders the appropriate error page
    parent::userHasPermission($permissionType);
}

Or remove the override entirely, since the WebExceptionListener registered in the Kernel already handles exception-to-response conversion.

Affected software

Click a technology to see all vulnerabilities affecting it.

PlatformPackageVulnerable versionsFixed in
Composer package phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq < 4.1.2 4.1.2
Composer package thorsten/phpmyfaq < 4.1.2 4.1.2

References

CVSS score 6.5/10
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weakness (CWE)
CWE-863
Platform
Composer
Package
phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq, thorsten/phpmyfaq
Disclosed
06.05.2026
Updated
11.10.2026 10:22

Sources and licenses

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-hpgw-ww76-c68r - CC BY 4.0

Vulnerability history: thorsten/phpmyfaq

All published vulnerabilities of this package (Composer package), newest first. Shows whether this is a one-off slip or a package that needs watching.

All (112) in the archive
Total entries
112
First → latest
05.2022 09.2026
Without a fix
2
Exploited in attacks
0

Severity breakdown

  • Critical 8
  • High 36
  • Medium 67
  • Low 1

Disclosures per year

  1. 2022: 8
  2. 2023: 62
  3. 2024: 2
  4. 2025: 6
  5. 2026: 34
Severity:
  1. High · 8.1 CVE-2026-56737 >= 3.2.0, < 4.1.6 4.1.6
  2. High · 7.5 CVE-2026-35672 < 4.1.3 4.1.3
  3. High · 8.8 CVE-2026-35671 < 4.1.3 4.1.3
  4. phpMyFAQ has an Authorization Bypass in All Admin Pages Due to Non-Terminating Permission Check this entry
    Medium · 6.5 CVE-2026-46362 < 4.1.2 4.1.2
  5. High · 7.6 CVE-2026-46367 >= 4.1.1, < 4.1.2 4.1.2
  6. High · 7.5 CVE-2025-69200 < 4.0.16, >= 4.1.0-alpha, <= 4.1.0-beta.2 4.0.16
  7. High · 8.1 CVE-2025-59943 >= 4.0.7, < 4.0.13 4.0.13
  8. High · 7.6 CVE-2023-5865 < 3.2.2 3.2.2
  9. High · 7.4 CVE-2023-5864 < 3.2.1 3.2.1
  10. High · 8.3 CVE-2023-5319 < 3.1.18 3.1.18
  11. Critical · 9.0 CVE-2023-5320 < 3.1.18 3.1.18
  12. Critical · 9.1 CVE-2023-5316 < 3.1.18 3.1.18
  13. High · 8.8 CVE-2023-4007 < 3.1.16 3.1.16
  14. High · 8.2 CVE-2023-2550 < 3.1.13 3.1.13
  15. High · 8.3 CVE-2023-1887 < 3.1.12 3.1.12
  16. High · 7.3 CVE-2023-1886 < 3.1.12 3.1.12
  17. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2023-0788 < 3.1.11 3.1.11
  18. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2023-0789 < 3.1.11 3.1.11
  19. High · 8.8 CVE-2023-0790 < 3.1.11 3.1.11
  20. High · 8.8 CVE-2023-0793 < 3.1.11 3.1.11
Show more (5) Showing 40 of 45

Know which vulnerabilities affect your application

With the DockRay integration and software inventory enabled, DockRay checks reported component versions against known vulnerabilities and notifies you about confirmed matches. Coverage depends on the supported technology and available advisory data.

Connect your application
DockRay newsletter

Application security in your inbox

Important vulnerabilities, actionable guidance and practical advice for your applications. Choose your technologies and follow what matters to your project.

  • A daily digest of new vulnerabilities, critical ones included.
  • Notifications about important updates.
  • Practical advice on application security and monitoring.

Leave empty to receive updates for every technology.

Free to subscribe. Unsubscribe with one click in any email.