Medium

ApostropheCMS import-export tar guard misses './..' because it is a literal '../' substring test

  • Disclosed: 20.10.2026
  • Updated: 20.10.2026 21:35

Summary

The tar-extraction guard added to @apostrophecms/import-export for GHSA-mwxc-m426-3f78 is a literal substring test for ../, and ./.. does not contain that substring. An entry named ./.. therefore passes the guard, path.join normalizes it to the parent of the export directory, and the resulting fs.WriteStream opens a directory and emits EISDIR with no error listener attached, which terminates the Node process.

Confirmed on default-branch HEAD 1bd5d0a7a6fe880836fa75adad6964f1c577d640, package version 3.6.2.

Details

packages/import-export/lib/formats/gzip.js, in the tar-stream entry handler inside extract(filepath, exportPath):

js
const name = header.name.replace(/\\/g, '/');
if (name.includes('../')) {
  // skipped
}
...
stream.pipe(fs.WriteStream(path.join(exportPath, name)));

Two separate problems sit in those four lines. The guard tests the raw entry name for a substring instead of resolving the joined path and requiring containment, and the write stream has no error handler, so any stream error becomes an unhandled 'error' event.

Reaching it needs an account that can import, nothing more. packages/import-export/modules/@apostrophecms/import-export-page/index.js exposes post.importExportImport, which calls into lib/methods/import.js; that handler requires req.user and then calls format.input(exportPath), which for a .gz upload is gzip.js calling extract() on the uploaded archive.

PoC

This is not an end-to-end exploit. What follows is each of the three primitives the crash depends on, executed individually, plus a source-level trace of the route. The chain from post.importExportImport to extract() was read, not observed.

The guard misses the payload:

bash
node -e "console.log('./..'.includes('../')); console.log('..'.includes('../')); console.log('a/./..'.includes('../'));"
false
false
false

path.join then resolves it out of the export directory:

bash
node -e "const path=require('path'); const exportPath='/tmp/exportRoot'; console.log(path.join(exportPath,'./..'));"
/tmp

And a write stream opened on a directory, with no error listener, kills the process rather than failing the request:

bash
node -e "const fs=require('fs'); const s=fs.createWriteStream('/tmp'); s.write('x'); s.end(); setTimeout(()=>console.log('still alive'),500);"
events.js:291
      throw er; // Unhandled 'error' event
      ^

Error: EISDIR: illegal operation on a directory, open '/tmp'
Emitted 'error' event on WriteStream instance at:
    at internal/fs/streams.js:361:12
    at FSReqCallback.oncomplete (fs.js:156:23) {
  errno: -21,
  code: 'EISDIR',
  syscall: 'open',
  path: '/tmp'
}

The events.js:291 frame shows that transcript came off the Node 14 line my audit box had. The unhandled-error-event behavior is not version specific, but the exact message on your supported Node versions is worth a re-run.

Source-side confirmation without running anything:

bash
grep -n "includes('../')" packages/import-export/lib/formats/gzip.js
grep -n "WriteStream" packages/import-export/lib/formats/gzip.js

Impact

An authenticated user who can reach the import UI uploads one crafted archive and takes down the Node process handling it. Every worker that picks up such an archive dies the same way.

Suggested fix

Resolve the target and require containment, and attach an error handler:

js
const base = path.resolve(exportPath);
const target = path.resolve(path.join(exportPath, name));

if (target !== base && !target.startsWith(base + path.sep)) {
  stream.on('end', next);
  stream.resume();
  return;
}

if (header.type === 'directory') {
  fsp.mkdir(target).then(next).catch(reject);
} else {
  const out = fs.WriteStream(target);
  out.on('error', reject);
  stream.pipe(out);
  stream.on('end', next);
}

The error handler earns its place independently. Any tar entry that lands on an existing directory name has the same effect whether or not traversal is involved.

Why this is not GHSA-mwxc-m426-3f78

The name.includes('../') check is the mitigation shipped for GHSA-mwxc-m426-3f78 / CVE-2026-32731. It stops names carrying the literal ../ sequence. It does not canonicalize the joined path, so ./.. and a bare .. still get through, and it did not touch the missing error listener. This report is about what the substring test leaves behind.

AI assistance was used for the code audit and drafting. The exact guard and WriteStream lines in packages/import-export/lib/formats/gzip.js at the stated HEAD were manually verified, the import route from the page module through lib/methods/import.js into the entry handler were manually traced, and the three Node one-liners were manually ran and copied verbatim.

What to do

Update @apostrophecms/import-export to version 3.7.0 or later.

Affected software

Click a technology to see all vulnerabilities affecting it.

PlatformPackageVulnerable versionsFixed in
npm package @apostrophecms/import-export < 3.7.0 3.7.0

References

CVSS score -
CVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Weakness (CWE)
CWE-22
Platform
npm
Package
@apostrophecms/import-export
Disclosed
20.10.2026
Updated
20.10.2026 21:35

Sources and licenses · Edited or translated by DockRay; source rights and applicable licenses are retained.

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-97wv-p4xx-c7mg - CC BY 4.0

Vulnerability history: @apostrophecms/import-export

All published vulnerabilities of this package (npm package), newest first. Shows whether this is a one-off slip or a package that needs watching.

Total entries
4
First → latest
03.2026 10.2026
Without a fix
0
Exploited in attacks
0

Severity breakdown

  • Critical 1
  • Medium 3

Disclosures per year

  1. 2026: 4
  1. ApostropheCMS import-export tar guard misses './..' because it is a literal '../' substring test this entry
    Medium CVE-2026-113664 < 3.7.0 3.7.0

Know which vulnerabilities affect your application

With the DockRay integration and software inventory enabled, DockRay checks reported component versions against known vulnerabilities and notifies you about confirmed matches. Coverage depends on the supported technology and available advisory data.

Connect your application
DockRay newsletter

Application security in your inbox

Important vulnerabilities, actionable guidance and practical advice for your applications. Choose your technologies and follow what matters to your project.

  • A daily digest of new vulnerabilities, critical ones included.
  • Notifications about important updates.
  • Practical advice on application security and monitoring.

Leave empty to receive updates for every technology.

Free to subscribe. Unsubscribe with one click in any email.