Medium

HTTP/2 Stream Cancellation Attack

  • Disclosed: 10.10.2023
  • Updated: 11.10.2026 13:20

CISA confirms exploitation of this vulnerability in real attacks. Prioritise checking whether your application is affected. CISA KEV · CC0 1.0

HTTP/2 Rapid reset attack

The HTTP/2 protocol allows clients to indicate to the server that a previous stream should be canceled by sending a RST_STREAM frame. The protocol does not require the client and server to coordinate the cancellation in any way, the client may do it unilaterally. The client may also assume that the cancellation will take effect immediately when the server receives the RST_STREAM frame, before any other data from that TCP connection is processed.

Abuse of this feature is called a Rapid Reset attack because it relies on the ability for an endpoint to send a RST_STREAM frame immediately after sending a request frame, which makes the other endpoint start working and then rapidly resets the request. The request is canceled, but leaves the HTTP/2 connection open.

The HTTP/2 Rapid Reset attack built on this capability is simple: The client opens a large number of streams at once as in the standard HTTP/2 attack, but rather than waiting for a response to each request stream from the server or proxy, the client cancels each request immediately.

The ability to reset streams immediately allows each connection to have an indefinite number of requests in flight. By explicitly canceling the requests, the attacker never exceeds the limit on the number of concurrent open streams. The number of in-flight requests is no longer dependent on the round-trip time (RTT), but only on the available network bandwidth.

In a typical HTTP/2 server implementation, the server will still have to do significant amounts of work for canceled requests, such as allocating new stream data structures, parsing the query and doing header decompression, and mapping the URL to a resource. For reverse proxy implementations, the request may be proxied to the backend server before the RST_STREAM frame is processed. The client on the other hand paid almost no costs for sending the requests. This creates an exploitable cost asymmetry between the server and the client.

Multiple software artifacts implementing HTTP/2 are affected. This advisory was originally ingested from the swift-nio-http2 repo advisory and their original conent follows.

swift-nio-http2 specific advisory

swift-nio-http2 is vulnerable to a denial-of-service vulnerability in which a malicious client can create and then reset a large number of HTTP/2 streams in a short period of time. This causes swift-nio-http2 to commit to a large amount of expensive work which it then throws away, including creating entirely new Channels to serve the traffic. This can easily overwhelm an EventLoop and prevent it from making forward progress.

swift-nio-http2 1.28 contains a remediation for this issue that applies reset counter using a sliding window. This constrains the number of stream resets that may occur in a given window of time. Clients violating this limit will have their connections torn down. This allows clients to continue to cancel streams for legitimate reasons, while constraining malicious actors.

Affected software

Click a technology to see all vulnerabilities affecting it.

PlatformPackageVulnerable versionsFixed in
Java / Kotlin (Maven) com.typesafe.akka:akka-http-core < 10.5.3 10.5.3
Java / Kotlin (Maven) com.typesafe.akka:akka-http-core_2.11 <= 10.1.15 no fix
Java / Kotlin (Maven) com.typesafe.akka:akka-http-core_2.12 < 10.5.3 10.5.3
Java / Kotlin (Maven) com.typesafe.akka:akka-http-core_2.13 < 10.5.3 10.5.3
Java / Kotlin (Maven) org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.0-M12, >= 10.0.0, < 10.1.14, >= 9.0.0, < 9.0.81, >= 8.5.0, < 8.5.94 11.0.0-M12, 10.1.14, 9.0.81, 8.5.94
Java / Kotlin (Maven) org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-coyote >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.0-M12, >= 10.0.0, < 10.1.14, >= 9.0.0, < 9.0.81, >= 8.5.0, < 8.5.94 11.0.0-M12, 10.1.14, 9.0.81, 8.5.94
Java / Kotlin (Maven) org.eclipse.jetty.http2:http2-common >= 9.3.0, < 9.4.53, >= 10.0.0, < 10.0.17, >= 11.0.0, < 11.0.17 9.4.53, 10.0.17, 11.0.17
Java / Kotlin (Maven) org.eclipse.jetty.http2:http2-server >= 9.3.0, < 9.4.53, >= 10.0.0, < 10.0.17, >= 11.0.0, < 11.0.17 9.4.53, 10.0.17, 11.0.17
Java / Kotlin (Maven) org.eclipse.jetty.http2:jetty-http2-common >= 12.0.0, < 12.0.2 12.0.2
Java / Kotlin (Maven) org.eclipse.jetty.http2:jetty-http2-server >= 12.0.0, < 12.0.2 12.0.2

References

CVSS score 5.3/10
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L/E:H
Weakness (CWE)
CWE-400
Platform
Java / Kotlin (Maven)
Package
com.typesafe.akka:akka-http-core, com.typesafe.akka:akka-http-core_2.11, com.typesafe.akka:akka-http-core_2.12
Disclosed
10.10.2023
Updated
11.10.2026 13:20

Sources and licenses

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-qppj-fm5r-hxr3 - CC BY 4.0

Vulnerability history: org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core

All published vulnerabilities of this package (Java / Kotlin (Maven)), newest first. Shows whether this is a one-off slip or a package that needs watching.

All (77) in the archive
Total entries
77
First → latest
10.2018 08.2026
Without a fix
0
Exploited in attacks
5

Severity breakdown

  • Critical 11
  • High 36
  • Medium 25
  • Low 5

Disclosures per year

  1. 2018: 8
  2. 2019: 5
  3. 2020: 5
  4. 2021: 3
  5. 2022: 7
  6. 2023: 9
  7. 2024: 7
  8. 2025: 15
  9. 2026: 18
Severity:
  1. HTTP/2 Stream Cancellation Attack this entry
    Medium · 5.3 Exploited in attacks CVE-2023-44487 >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.0-M12, >= 10.0.0, < 10.1.14, >= 9.0.0, < 9.0.81, >= 8.5.0, < 8.5.94 11.0.0-M12, 10.1.14, 9.0.81, 8.5.94
  2. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2026-65905 >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.25, >= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.58, >= 9.0.0.M1, < 9.0.121, >= 8.5.0, <= 8.5.100, >= 7.0.30, <= 7.0.109 11.0.25, 10.1.58, 9.0.121
  3. Critical · 9.1 CVE-2026-65182 >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.25, >= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.58, >= 9.0.0-M1, < 9.0.121, >= 8.5.0, <= 8.5.100, >= 7.0.0, <= 7.0.109 11.0.25, 10.1.58, 9.0.121
  4. Critical · 9.1 CVE-2026-68525 >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.25, >= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.58, >= 9.0.0-M1, < 9.0.121, >= 8.5.0, <= 8.5.100, >= 7.0.0, <= 7.0.109 11.0.25, 10.1.58, 9.0.121
  5. High · 7.5 CVE-2026-41284 < 9.0.118, >= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.55, >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.22 9.0.118, 10.1.55, 11.0.22
  6. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2026-43512 < 9.0.118, >= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.55, >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.22 9.0.118, 10.1.55, 11.0.22
  7. High · 7.5 CVE-2026-43513 < 9.0.118, >= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.55, >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.22 9.0.118, 10.1.55, 11.0.22
  8. Critical · 9.1 CVE-2026-43515 < 9.0.118, >= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.55, >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.22 9.0.118, 10.1.55, 11.0.22
  9. High · 7.3 CVE-2026-42498 < 9.0.118, >= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.55, >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.22 9.0.118, 10.1.55, 11.0.22
  10. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2026-41293 >= 8.5.0, < 9.0.118, >= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.55, >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.22 9.0.118, 10.1.55, 11.0.22
  11. High · 7.5 CVE-2026-34487 >= 9.0.13, < 9.0.117, >= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.54, >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.21 9.0.117, 10.1.54, 11.0.21
  12. High · 7.5 CVE-2026-34483 >= 9.0.40, < 9.0.116, >= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.54, >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.21 9.0.116, 10.1.54, 11.0.21
  13. High · 7.5 CVE-2026-24880 >= 7.0.0, < 9.0.116, >= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.52, >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.20 9.0.116, 10.1.52, 11.0.20
  14. High · 7.5 CVE-2026-29129 >= 9.0.114, < 9.0.116, >= 10.1.51, < 10.1.53, >= 11.0.16, < 11.0.20 9.0.116, 10.1.53, 11.0.20
  15. High · 7.5 CVE-2026-24734 >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.18, >= 10.1.0-M7, < 10.1.52, >= 9.0.83, < 9.0.115 11.0.18, 10.1.52, 9.0.115
  16. High · 7.5 CVE-2025-55752 >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.11, >= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.45, >= 9.0.0-M11, < 9.0.109, >= 8.5.6, <= 8.5.100 11.0.11, 10.1.45, 9.0.109
  17. High · 7.5 CVE-2025-48989 >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.10, >= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.44, >= 9.0.0.M1, < 9.0.108 11.0.10, 10.1.44, 9.0.108
  18. High · 7.5 CVE-2025-53506 >= 8.5.0, <= 8.5.100, >= 9.0.0.M1, < 9.0.107, >= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.43, >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.9 9.0.107, 10.1.43, 11.0.9
  19. High · 7.5 CVE-2025-52520 >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.9, >= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.43, >= 9.0.0.M1, < 9.0.107, >= 8.5.0, <= 8.5.100 11.0.9, 10.1.43, 9.0.107
  20. High · 7.5 CVE-2025-48988 >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.8, >= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.42, >= 9.0.0.M1, < 9.0.106, >= 8.5.0, <= 8.5.100 11.0.8, 10.1.42, 9.0.106
  21. Critical · 9.8 Exploited in attacks CVE-2025-24813 >= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.3, >= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.35, >= 9.0.0.M1, < 9.0.99, >= 8.5.0, <= 8.5.100 11.0.3, 10.1.35, 9.0.99
Show more (20) Showing 21 of 48

Know which vulnerabilities affect your application

With the DockRay integration and software inventory enabled, DockRay checks reported component versions against known vulnerabilities and notifies you about confirmed matches. Coverage depends on the supported technology and available advisory data.

Connect your application
DockRay newsletter

Application security in your inbox

Important vulnerabilities, actionable guidance and practical advice for your applications. Choose your technologies and follow what matters to your project.

  • A daily digest of new vulnerabilities, critical ones included.
  • Notifications about important updates.
  • Practical advice on application security and monitoring.

Leave empty to receive updates for every technology.

Free to subscribe. Unsubscribe with one click in any email.