Sign in
Deutsch English Español Polski
Critical

Vyper has incorrectly allocated named re-entrancy locks

  • Disclosed: 07.08.2023
  • Updated: 11.10.2026 15:17

Impact

In versions 0.2.15, 0.2.16 and 0.3.0, named re-entrancy locks are allocated incorrectly. Each function using a named re-entrancy lock gets a unique lock regardless of the key, allowing cross-function re-entrancy in contracts compiled with the susceptible versions. A specific set of conditions is required to result in misbehavior of affected contracts, specifically:

  • A .vy contract compiled with either of the following vyper versions: 0.2.15, 0.2.16, 0.3.0
  • A primary function that utilizes the @nonreentrant decorator with a specific key and does not strictly follow the check-effects-interaction pattern (i.e. contains an external call to an untrusted party before storage updates)
  • A secondary function that utilizes the same key and would be affected by the improper state caused by the primary function

Patches

https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/2439, https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/2514

Workarounds

Upgrade to 0.3.1 or higher

References

Technical post-mortem report: https://hackmd.io/@vyperlang/HJUgNMhs2

Affected software

Click a technology to see all vulnerabilities affecting it.

PlatformPackageVulnerable versionsFixed in
Python (PyPI) vyper >= 0.2.15, < 0.3.1 0.3.1

References

CVSS score 8.7/10
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H
Weakness (CWE)
CWE-863
Platform
Python (PyPI)
Package
vyper
Disclosed
07.08.2023
Updated
11.10.2026 15:17

Sources and licenses

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - PYSEC-2023-142 - PyPA Advisory Database; CC BY 4.0

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-5824-cm3x-3c38 - CC BY 4.0

Vulnerability history: vyper

All published vulnerabilities of this package (Python (PyPI)), newest first. Shows whether this is a one-off slip or a package that needs watching.

All (47) in the archive
Total entries
47
First → latest
03.2020 10.2026
Without a fix
5
Exploited in attacks
0

Severity breakdown

  • Critical 3
  • High 14
  • Medium 20
  • Low 10

Disclosures per year

Severity:
  1. Vyper negative array index bounds checks
    Critical · 9.8 CVE-2024-24563 < 0.4.0 0.4.0
  2. Vyper's bounds check on built-in `slice()` function can be overflowed
    Critical · 9.8 CVE-2024-24561 < 0.4.0 0.4.0
  3. concat built-in can corrupt memory in vyper
    High · 7.3 CVE-2024-22419 >= 0.3.0, < 0.4.0 0.4.0
  4. incorrect storage layout for contracts containing large arrays
    High · 7.5 CVE-2023-46247 < 0.3.8 0.3.8
  5. Vyper vulnerable to memory corruption in certain builtins utilizing `msize`
    High · 8.1 CVE-2023-42443 >= 0.3.4, < 0.3.10 0.3.10
  6. Vyper has incorrectly allocated named re-entrancy locks this entry
    Critical · 8.7 CVE-2023-39363 >= 0.2.15, < 0.3.1 0.3.1
  7. Vyper vulnerable to incorrect ordering of arguments for kwargs passed to internal calls
    High · 7.5 CVE-2023-32059 < 0.3.8 0.3.8
  8. Vyper vulnerable to integer overflow in loop
    High · 7.5 CVE-2023-32058 < 0.3.8 0.3.8
  9. Vyper vulnerable to OOB DynArray access when array is on both LHS and RHS of an assignment
    High · 7.5 CVE-2023-31146 < 0.3.8 0.3.8
  10. vyper vulnerable to storage allocator overflow
    High · 7.5 CVE-2023-30837 < 0.3.8 0.3.8
  11. Incorrect success value returned in vyper
    High · 7.5 CVE-2023-30629 >= 0.3.1, < 0.3.8 0.3.8
  12. Multiple evaluation of contract address in call in vyper
    High · 7.5 CVE-2022-29255 < 0.3.4 0.3.4
  13. Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the ethereum virtual machine. In affected versions, the return of `<iface>.returns_int128()` is not validated to fall within the bounds of `int128`. Thi
    High · 8.8 CVE-2022-24845 < 0.3.2 0.3.2
  14. Buffer Overflow in vyper
    High · 7.1 CVE-2022-24788 < 0.3.2 0.3.2
  15. Incorrect Comparison in Vyper
    High · 7.5 CVE-2022-24787 < 0.3.2 0.3.2
  16. Memory corruption when returning a literal struct with a private call inside of it
    High · 7.5 CVE-2021-41121 < 0.3.0 0.3.0
  17. Storage corruption due to variables overwritten by re-entrancy locks
    High ghsa-7f92-rr6w-cq64 >= 0.2.13, < 0.2.15 0.2.15

Know which vulnerabilities affect your application

With the DockRay integration and software inventory enabled, DockRay checks reported component versions against known vulnerabilities and notifies you about confirmed matches. Coverage depends on the supported technology and available advisory data.

Connect your application
DockRay newsletter

Application security in your inbox

Important vulnerabilities, actionable guidance and practical advice for your applications. Choose your technologies and follow what matters to your project.

  • A daily digest of new vulnerabilities, critical ones included.
  • Notifications about important updates.
  • Practical advice on application security and monitoring.

Leave empty to receive updates for every technology.

Privacy policy

Free to subscribe. Unsubscribe with one click in any email.