Possible pod name collisions in jupyterhub-kubespawner
Impact
What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?
JupyterHub deployments using:
- KubeSpawner <= 0.11.1 (e.g. zero-to-jupyterhub 0.9.0) and
- enabled named_servers (not default), and
- an Authenticator that allows:
- usernames with hyphens or other characters that require escape (e.g.
user-hyphenoruser@email), and - usernames which may match other usernames up to but not including the escaped character (e.g.
userin the above cases)
- usernames with hyphens or other characters that require escape (e.g.
In this circumstance, certain usernames will be able to craft particular server names which will grant them access to the default server of other users who have matching usernames.
Patches
Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?
Patch will be released in kubespawner 0.12 and zero-to-jupyterhub 0.9.1
Workarounds
Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?
KubeSpawner
Specify configuration:
for KubeSpawner
from traitlets import default
from kubespawner import KubeSpawner
class PatchedKubeSpawner(KubeSpawner):
@default("pod_name_template")
def _default_pod_name_template(self):
if self.name:
return "jupyter-{username}-{servername}"
else:
return "jupyter-{username}"
@default("pvc_name_template")
def _default_pvc_name_template(self):
if self.name:
return "claim-{username}-{servername}"
else:
return "claim-{username}"
c.JupyterHub.spawner_class = PatchedKubeSpawner
Note for KubeSpawner: this configuration will behave differently before and after the upgrade, so will need to be removed when upgrading. Only apply this configuration while still using KubeSpawner ≤ 0.11.1 and remove it after upgrade to ensure consistent pod and pvc naming.
Changing the name template means pvcs for named servers will have different names. This will result in orphaned PVCs for named servers across Hub upgrade! This may appear as data loss for users, depending on configuration, but the orphaned PVCs will still be around and data can be migrated manually (or new PVCs created manually to reference existing PVs) before deleting the old PVCs and/or PVs.
References
Are there any links users can visit to find out more?
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
- Open an issue in kubespawner
- Email us at security@ipython.org
Credit: Jining Huang
Affected software
Click a technology to see all vulnerabilities affecting it.
| Platform | Package | Vulnerable versions | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Python (PyPI) | jupyterhub-kubespawner | < 0.12.0 | 0.12.0 |
References
- https://github.com/jupyterhub/kubespawner/security/advisories/GHSA-v7m9-9497-p9gr
- https://github.com/jupyterhub/kubespawner/commit/3dfe870a7f5e98e2e398b01996ca6b8eff4bb1d0
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-15110
- https://github.com/jupyterhub/kubespawner
- https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/jupyterhub-kubespawner/PYSEC-2020-51.yaml
- CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N- Weakness (CWE)
CWE-863- Platform
- Python (PyPI)
- Package
jupyterhub-kubespawner- Disclosed
- 17.07.2020
- Updated
- 11.10.2026 13:19
Sources and licenses
OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - PYSEC-2020-51 - PyPA Advisory Database; CC BY 4.0
OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-v7m9-9497-p9gr - CC BY 4.0
Vulnerability history: jupyterhub-kubespawner
All published vulnerabilities of this package (Python (PyPI)), newest first. Shows whether this is a one-off slip or a package that needs watching.
This is the only known vulnerability of this package.
Know which vulnerabilities affect your application
With the DockRay integration and software inventory enabled, DockRay checks reported component versions against known vulnerabilities and notifies you about confirmed matches. Coverage depends on the supported technology and available advisory data.