Pillow: Reachable undefined behavior in native integer operations, potentially leading to denial of service or logic integrity compromise
Summary
Affected Object and Source
Package: Pillow 12.3.0 Source: PyPI sdist pillow-12.3.0.tar.gz SHA-256: 3b8182a766685eaa002637e28b4ec8d6b18819a0c71f579bf0dbaa5830297cce Sink: src/_imaging.c:2809:15, xsize += dx
Details
The code in Pillow 12.3.0 is:
for (xsize = 0; *text; text++) {
int dx = self->glyphs[*text].dx;
if (dx > 0 && xsize > INT_MAX - dx) {
PyErr_SetString(PyExc_OverflowError, "Width too large");
return -1;
}
xsize += dx;
}The PILfont glyph advance is parsed from a signed 16-bit field, so the valid range for dx is [-32768, 32767]. The existing check only proves:
dx > 0 => xsize <= INT_MAX - dx
It does not prove the other half of the contract:
dx < 0 => xsize >= INT_MIN - dx
Taking dx = -32768 and repeating it 65,537 times, the mathematical sum is -2,147,516,416, which is less than INT_MIN = -2,147,483,648. On the 65,537th addition, the operation -2147483648 + -32768 is performed, resulting in C signed overflow undefined behavior.
PoC
"""Minimal public-API reproducer for the Pillow 12.3.0 textwidth underflow.
Run with an ordinary Pillow 12.3.0 build to observe the wrapped width, or with
the PyC-Contract UBSan build to obtain the exact native diagnostic.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import struct
from io import BytesIO
import PIL
from PIL import Image, ImageFont
ADVANCE = -(2**15)
CONTROL_REPEAT = 65_536
WITNESS_REPEAT = 65_537
def bitmap_font(advance: int) -> ImageFont.ImageFont:
metrics = bytearray(256 * 20)
glyph_offset = ord("A") * 20
metrics[glyph_offset : glyph_offset + 2] = struct.pack(">h", advance)
font_data = b"PILfont\n;;;;;;1;\nDATA\n" + bytes(metrics)
font = ImageFont.ImageFont()
font._load_pilfont_data(BytesIO(font_data), Image.new("1", (1, 1)))
return font
def main() -> None:
font = bitmap_font(ADVANCE)
print(f"Pillow={PIL.__version__}")
print(f"control_math={ADVANCE * CONTROL_REPEAT}")
print(f"control_return={font.getlength('A' * CONTROL_REPEAT)}")
print(f"witness_math={ADVANCE * WITNESS_REPEAT}")
print(f"witness_return={font.getlength('A' * WITNESS_REPEAT)}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()Observations from a regular 12.3.0 release build:
Pillow=12.3.0
control_math=-2147483648
control_return=0
witness_math=-2147516416
witness_return=2147450880The adjacent control uses 65,536 repetitions, producing a mathematical result of exactly INT_MIN, and the function subsequently returns 0 according to existing semantics. Adding just a single character flips the return value to 2,147,450,880.
Impact
The directly confirmed impact is width semantic integrity violation: getlength() and boundary calculations based on getsize() may return a huge positive value, while the true mathematical width is negative. The high-level getmask() typically passes through the decompression-bomb check, which mitigates the risk of direct massive allocation; however, internal font objects and applications that use the width for layout, quotas, serialization, or subsequent allocations may be affected by resource consumption or logic errors.
Therefore, the current recommended severity rating is "Reachable native integer undefined behavior, with potential DoS/logic integrity impact; specific security severity to be confirmed by the upstream threat model", rather than a memory corruption vulnerability.
Recommended Patch and Regression Tests
It is recommended to extend the overflow check to cover both directions:
if ((dx > 0 && xsize > INT_MAX - dx) ||
(dx < 0 && xsize < INT_MIN - dx)) {
PyErr_SetString(PyExc_OverflowError, "Width too large");
return -1;
}At a minimum, four test cases should be added:
dx = 32767, repeat = 65538— upper adjacent control (should succeed);dx = 32767, repeat = 65539— should raiseOverflowError;dx = -32768, repeat = 65536— lower adjacent control (should succeed);dx = -32768, repeat = 65537— should raiseOverflowError.
Additionally, it should be verified that exception propagation is consistent across getlength(), getbbox(), getmask(), and the underlying font.getsize().
Affected software
Click a technology to see all vulnerabilities affecting it.
| Platform | Package | Vulnerable versions | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Python (PyPI) | pillow | < 13.0.0 | 13.0.0 |
References
- https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/security/advisories/GHSA-4rm8-3hmm-39fg
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-96641
- https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/10010
- https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/commit/80de4be9e38d3a6148dd4d8491eb80cd12b760a4
- https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow
- https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/releases/tag/13.0.0
- CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H- Weakness (CWE)
CWE-190- Platform
- Python (PyPI)
- Package
pillow- Disclosed
- 22.10.2026
- Updated
- 22.10.2026 19:17
Sources and licenses
OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-4rm8-3hmm-39fg - CC BY 4.0
Vulnerability history: pillow
All published vulnerabilities of this package (Python (PyPI)), newest first. Shows whether this is a one-off slip or a package that needs watching.
- Total entries
- 98
- First → latest
- 04.2014 10.2026
- Without a fix
- 0
- Exploited in attacks
- 1
Severity breakdown
- Critical 12
- High 57
- Medium 27
- Low 1
- Unrated 1
Disclosures per year
- 2017: 1
- 2018: 0
- 2019: 1
- 2020: 10
- 2021: 20
- 2022: 8
- 2023: 3
- 2024: 2
- 2025: 1
- 2026: 40
earlier: 12
-
Pillow: Reachable undefined behavior in native integer operations, potentially leading to denial of service or logic integrity compromise this entry
Know which vulnerabilities affect your application
With the DockRay integration and software inventory enabled, DockRay checks reported component versions against known vulnerabilities and notifies you about confirmed matches. Coverage depends on the supported technology and available advisory data.