Alta

djust: Six template-layer defects emit attacker-controlled markup unescaped (XSS)

  • Publicada: 17.09.2026
  • Actualizado: 11.10.2026 15:18

Five independent defects in djust's template auto-escaping cause attacker-controlled input to be rendered as live markup where Django escapes it. All four are present in shipped 1.1.0 and are fixed in 1.1.1.

They share one shape: a filter or grant that escapes nothing itself and relies on the render-time auto-escape, which something downstream then removes. They are grouped into a single advisory because the mitigation is identical — upgrade to 1.1.1 — and because no single one of them is meaningfully actionable in isolation.

1. linenumbers never escaped its input (#2291)

{{ p|linenumbers|safe }}   with p = '<img src=x onerror=alert(1)>'
  djust   '1. <img src=x onerror=alert(1)>'      <- executes
  django  '1. &lt;img src=x onerror=alert(1)&gt;'

The filter deferred all escaping to render time; a trailing |safe suppressed exactly that. The exposure is wider than the |safe form: any downstream filter that reads the output as markup is affected, including {{ p|linenumbers|truncatechars_html:"5" }}, which contains no |safe at all.

2. escape was a no-op (#2281)

{{ p|escape|safe }}
  djust   '<img src=x onerror=alert(1)>'          <- executes
  django  '&amp;lt;img src=x onerror=alert(1)&amp;gt;'

Django's escape is eager (conditional_escape, returning SafeString). djust's returned its input unchanged and let the render site escape it — indistinguishable for {{ p|escape }} alone, wrong for every chain. The security cell is {{ p|escape|safe }}: an idiom that reads as "escape it, then it is safe to emit" — which is what Django's semantics make true — was a bare |safe on attacker input. A sweep of every length-2 and length-3 chain containing escape found 104 live-markup cells.

3. unordered_list / safeseq handed a string back under a safe grant (#2274)

Both carry an unconditional "emit without escaping" grant, earned because they escape every item they emit. Given a string rather than a sequence they emitted nothing and returned the input verbatim under that same grant, making {{ hostile|safeseq }} an exact synonym for |safe with no mark_safe anywhere in the template.

4. A safety grant outlived the value it was granted for (#2300)

No filter chain and no |safe anywhere; a bare {{ p }} is the whole reproducer.

Safe context keys accumulated on the view and were never revoked, so a key marked safe once stayed safe for the lifetime of the view — which spans every event on a WebSocket connection:

python
render 1:  p = mark_safe('<b>trusted</b>')     ->  '<b>trusted</b>'   correct
render 2:  p = '<img src=x onerror=alert(1)>'  ->  executes

A view that renders trusted markup into a variable and later renders user input into the same variable emits it live.

5. A custom tag handler's return was emitted raw — including djust's own {% render_slot %} (#2379)

Reachable with no |safe, no mark_safe, and no application code: using component slots is enough.

Django's SimpleNode.render runs conditional_escape over a simple_tag's return unless it carries __html__. djust inserted the return verbatim, so a handler as ordinary as return f"Hello {name}" emitted attacker markup live.

Of the 221 handlers djust registers, one echoes a context value unescaped — render_slot, the framework's own function-component/slot tag:

{% render_slot p %}     p = '<img src=x onerror=alert(1)>'

  djust   '<img src=x onerror=alert(1)>'          <- executes
  django  '&lt;img src=x onerror=alert(1)&gt;'

Together with defect 3 this is one of the two classes reachable without the application writing anything unusual.

6. linebreaks / linebreaksbr — and |safe was the only spelling that worked (#2284)

linebreaks emits <p>/<br> but neither escaped its content nor reported its output safe. The plain spelling therefore escaped the filter's own tags and printed a literal <p> on the page, so |safe was the only form that rendered at all — and that form emitted the content live:

{{ bio|linebreaks }}         renders literal '<p>' text        (visibly broken)
{{ bio|linebreaks|safe }}    '<img src=x onerror=alert(1)>'    <- executes

Because the broken spelling is the one a developer discards, the vulnerable spelling is the one that ships. Any application rendering user-entered text with paragraph breaks is written that way.

Impact

Stored or reflected XSS in any djust application that renders untrusted input through the affected filters, or that reuses a context variable which was previously marked safe. Exploitation requires no special configuration. Defects 3, 4 and 5 require no unusual template construct at all — defect 5 needs only that the application use component slots, and defect 6's vulnerable spelling is the only one that renders correctly.

Patches

Fixed in 1.1.1, and in 1.2.0 (main).

1.1.1 re-implements each fix against 1.1.0's own code rather than back-porting main's, which depends on a value-level safety model 1.1.0 does not have. Three consequences are documented in the 1.1.1 CHANGELOG and are all in the over-escaping direction: {{ p|escape|F }} double-escapes for a plain following filter F; {% render_slot slot.content %} over-escapes; and a mark_safed value passed through |escape is escaped rather than passed through.

Not fixed in 1.1.1, and tracked separately: application-written tag handlers that return attacker data as a plain str (only djust's own render_slot is covered by defect 5), and a {% with %}/{% for %} bind inheriting a safety grant it never earned. Both are fixed in 1.2.0.

Workarounds

None complete. Before upgrading, avoid |safe after any filter in a chain, avoid safeseq/unordered_list on values that may be strings, and avoid reusing a context variable for both mark_safe content and untrusted input.

Credit

Found during an internal Django-parity audit by a registry-wide differential that compares djust's escaping capabilities against Django's across every filter chain, rather than by inspection.

Software afectado

Haz clic en una tecnología para ver todas sus vulnerabilidades.

PlataformaPaqueteVersiones vulnerablesCorregida en
Python (PyPI) djust < 1.1.1 1.1.1

Referencias

Puntuación CVSS -
Debilidad (CWE)
CWE-116, CWE-79
Plataforma
Python (PyPI)
Paquete
djust
Publicada
17.09.2026
Actualizado
11.10.2026 15:18

Fuentes y licencias

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-9395-2g46-rj3f - CC BY 4.0

Historial de vulnerabilidades: djust

Todas las vulnerabilidades publicadas de este paquete (Python (PyPI)), de la más reciente a la más antigua. Muestra si es un fallo aislado o un paquete que hay que vigilar.

Todas (15) en el archivo
Entradas en total
15
Primera → última
08.2026 09.2026
Sin corrección
0
Explotada en ataques
0

Distribución por gravedad

  • Crítica 1
  • Alta 11
  • Media 3

Divulgaciones por año

  1. 2026: 15
Gravedad:
  1. djust: Six template-layer defects emit attacker-controlled markup unescaped (XSS) esta entrada
    Alta ghsa-9395-2g46-rj3f < 1.1.1 1.1.1
  2. Alta · 7.1 CVE-2026-61596 < 1.0.7 1.0.7
  3. Crítica · 9.1 CVE-2026-61594 < 1.0.7 1.0.7

Identifica las vulnerabilidades de tu aplicación

Con la integración de DockRay y el inventario de software activado, DockRay compara las versiones notificadas de los componentes con las vulnerabilidades conocidas y avisa de las coincidencias confirmadas. La cobertura depende de la tecnología compatible y de los avisos disponibles.

Conectar tu aplicación
Newsletter DockRay

La seguridad de tus aplicaciones en tu correo

Vulnerabilidades importantes, recomendaciones concretas y consejos prácticos para tus aplicaciones. Elige tus tecnologías y sigue lo que importa para tu proyecto.

  • Un resumen diario de nuevas vulnerabilidades, también las críticas.
  • Avisos sobre actualizaciones importantes.
  • Consejos prácticos sobre seguridad y monitorización de aplicaciones.

Déjalo vacío para recibir avisos de todas las tecnologías.

Suscripción gratuita. Date de baja con un clic en cualquier correo.