Lemur: Sub-CA creation never checks `AuthorityPermission` on the parent authority
Summary
Repo under test: https://github.com/Netflix/lemur
When ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION=False (an explicitly supported and documented configuration), POST /api/1/authorities with type=subca never verifies that the caller holds AuthorityPermission on the supplied parent authority. The parent field is resolved by AssociatedAuthoritySchema via a raw fetch_objects(Authority, data) lookup, then passed straight through service.create → mint → cryptography-issuer.create_authority, which loads options["parent"].authority_certificate.private_key and signs a brand-new intermediate CA on the caller's behalf.
Any authenticated non-read-only user can therefore mint a sub-CA chained to any internal root whose private key Lemur holds — including roots they hold no role on — attach a role they already belong to, and immediately issue or offline-sign trusted leaf certificates for arbitrary names.
Affected route
POST /api/1/authorities (with type=subca)
Affected code
lemur/authorities/views.py:231— gates only onAuthorityCreatorPermission()+StrictRolePermission(); noAuthorityPermissionondata['parent']lemur/authorities/schemas.py:58—parent = fields.Nested(AssociatedAuthoritySchema);validate_subcaonly checks presencelemur/schemas.py:107—AssociatedAuthoritySchema.get_object→fetch_objects(Authority, data)resolves any authority by id/name with no permission checklemur/plugins/lemur_cryptography/plugin.py:40—private_key = options["authority"].authority_certificate.private_key(set fromoptions["parent"]) signs the new intermediatelemur/auth/permissions.py:62—AuthorityCreatorPermissionbecomes always-allow whenADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION=Falselemur/certificates/views.py:538—is_private_authority(true forcryptography-issuer) skipsUSER_DOMAIN_AUTHORIZATION_PROVIDERfor subsequent leaf issuance
Impact
In deployments that set ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION=False to enable self-service CA creation, any authenticated non-read-only user — with zero permission on a given internal root CA — can obtain a working intermediate CA chained to that root. They can then:
- Issue TLS certificates for arbitrary names trusted by every relying party that trusts the internal root, bypassing
LEMUR_ALLOWED_DOMAINS, sensitive-domain flags, and the per-user domain-authorization plugin. - Export the sub-CA private key and sign end-entity certificates entirely outside Lemur, defeating all in-product issuance controls.
This converts "can create a self-contained test CA" into "can mint trusted certs under any internal PKI root in the organisation". The ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION documentation does not warn operators of this consequence.
Root cause
AuthoritiesList.post evaluates AuthorityCreatorPermission (a global "may create authorities" flag) and StrictRolePermission, but never evaluates AuthorityPermission(parent.id, parent.roles) against the caller-supplied parent. AssociatedAuthoritySchema is a pure lookup schema with no authz hook, and neither authorities.service.create nor mint re-check before invoking issuer_plugin.create_authority(options). The bundled cryptography-issuer then uses the parent's stored private key directly.
Validated evidence
Static trace, confirmed by code inspection (validation status: CONFIRMED):
parentis loaded viaAssociatedAuthoritySchema(rawfetch_objects), passed unchecked throughviews.post → service.create → mint → plugin.create_authority → issue_certificate, where the parent authority's stored private key is read and used to sign the new intermediate.- No call to
AuthorityPermission(parent.id, ...)exists anywhere on this path. - Precondition
ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION=Falseis an explicitly supported config (docs/administration.rst:517).
Proof of concept / reproducer
Status: reconstructed from source report (static control-flow trace; not executed against a live CA).
Preconditions: ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION=False; attacker is an authenticated Lemur user holding any role other than read-only; <PARENT_AUTHORITY_ID> is any internal cryptography-issuer root CA the attacker holds no role on; <ATTACKER_ROLE> is any role the attacker already belongs to.
curl -sS -X POST "<TARGET_BASE_URL>/api/1/authorities" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer <AUTH_TOKEN>" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"name": "attacker-subca",
"owner": "attacker@example.com",
"description": "poc",
"type": "subca",
"parent": {"id": <PARENT_AUTHORITY_ID>},
"plugin": {"slug": "cryptography-issuer"},
"roles": [{"name": "<ATTACKER_ROLE>"}],
"commonName": "attacker-intermediate",
"validityYears": 1
}'
The response contains a new authority whose authority_certificate is signed by <PARENT_AUTHORITY_ID>'s private key. The caller is recorded as creator and holds <ATTACKER_ROLE> on it, so POST /api/1/certificates against the new authority succeeds (and skips allowed_issuance_for_domain because is_private_authority is true).
Static-trace validation command from the source report:
grep -n 'parent' lemur/authorities/schemas.py lemur/authorities/views.py lemur/authorities/service.py \
&& sed -n '37,55p' lemur/plugins/lemur_cryptography/plugin.py
Source artifact: audit/harnesses/public-repo-threat-model-harness/results/netflix-lemur-100run-mythos-20260627T051129Z/findings.jsonl (run_022, finding cluster lemur-subca-parent-authz, 5/100 runs).
Suggested fix
In AuthoritiesList.post (or authorities.service.create), when data.get('parent') is present, enforce AuthorityPermission(parent.id, [r.name for r in parent.roles]).can() before invoking the issuer plugin, regardless of ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION. Additionally, update the ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION documentation to state that disabling it currently grants every authenticated user the ability to chain sub-CAs off any internal root whose private key Lemur holds. Consider also requiring admin (or an explicit per-parent capability) for any type=subca creation independent of the global flag.
Software afectado
Haz clic en una tecnología para ver todas sus vulnerabilidades.
| Plataforma | Paquete | Versiones vulnerables | Corregida en |
|---|---|---|---|
| Python (PyPI) | lemur | < 1.9.3 | 1.9.3 |
Referencias
- https://github.com/Netflix/lemur/security/advisories/GHSA-g7p5-89mh-248h
- https://github.com/Netflix/lemur/commit/8669011203ca3dd89d9e39bab9ef6850eca723f9
- https://github.com/Netflix/lemur
- https://github.com/Netflix/lemur/releases/tag/v1.9.3
- https://pypi.org/project/lemur
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-g7p5-89mh-248h
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-71317
- Vector CVSS
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N- Debilidad (CWE)
CWE-862- Plataforma
- Python (PyPI)
- Paquete
lemur- Publicada
- 18.08.2026
- Actualizado
- 11.10.2026 14:19
Fuentes y licencias
OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - PYSEC-2026-3677 - PyPA Advisory Database; CC BY 4.0
OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-g7p5-89mh-248h - CC BY 4.0
Historial de vulnerabilidades: lemur
Todas las vulnerabilidades publicadas de este paquete (Python (PyPI)), de la más reciente a la más antigua. Muestra si es un fallo aislado o un paquete que hay que vigilar.
- Entradas en total
- 18
- Primera → última
- 08.2017 08.2026
- Sin corrección
- 0
- Explotada en ataques
- 0
Distribución por gravedad
- Crítica 1
- Alta 9
- Media 8
Divulgaciones por año
- 2017: 1
- 2018: 0
- 2019: 0
- 2020: 0
- 2021: 0
- 2022: 0
- 2023: 1
- 2024: 0
- 2025: 0
- 2026: 16
-
Lemur: Sub-CA creation never checks `AuthorityPermission` on the parent authority esta entrada
Identifica las vulnerabilidades de tu aplicación
Con la integración de DockRay y el inventario de software activado, DockRay compara las versiones notificadas de los componentes con las vulnerabilidades conocidas y avisa de las coincidencias confirmadas. La cobertura depende de la tecnología compatible y de los avisos disponibles.