@roomi-fields/notebooklm-mcp has a path traversal in vault.batch tool that allows arbitrary file write outside intended vault directory
Summary
The vault_batch MCP tool (and the equivalent POST /batch-to-vault HTTP endpoint) accepted a caller-supplied vault_dir path that was passed directly to path.resolve() + fs.mkdir() with no containment check. A caller — or a prompt-injected LLM driving the MCP — could therefore create directories and write .md / .json answer files anywhere the server process can write.
The slug_prefix parameter had a parallel, smaller traversal vector: it was concatenated into the filename without sanitization, so a prefix containing / or .. could escape the resolved vault directory through the filename component.
Impact
File write (markdown + JSON sidecars) to any location writable by the server process. The written files are inert content (no code execution by themselves), but in a multi-user context — or when the MCP server is driven by an LLM that has read untrusted content (prompt injection) — this allows an attacker to plant files in sensitive locations (autostart folders, shell startup files, etc.) for downstream exploitation.
The vulnerability exists from v1.6.0 (when the HTTP /batch-to-vault endpoint was introduced) and v1.7.0 (when the same logic was exposed as the batch_to_vault MCP tool) through v2.0.2.
Patch
Fixed in v2.0.3:
- Opt-in containment via
NOTEBOOKLM_VAULT_ROOTenv var. When set,vault_diris resolved relative to that root andrealpath-based containment is enforced. Absolute paths or..segments outside the root are rejected with a clear error. slug_prefixis always sanitized. Path separators (/,\),..sequences and NUL bytes are stripped, length capped at 64 characters. This applies regardless of whetherNOTEBOOKLM_VAULT_ROOTis set.- 15 unit tests in
src/__tests__/vault-writer.test.tscover the escape vectors (absolute paths, sibling-prefix attacks,..traversal, NUL/separator stripping).
Workarounds for users who cannot upgrade
- Run the MCP server under a dedicated unprivileged user with write access only to the intended vault directory.
- Do not expose the HTTP
/batch-to-vaultendpoint beyond localhost. - If using an LLM that ingests untrusted content, validate any
vault_dirarguments before forwarding them to the MCP.
Configuration requirement after upgrade (important)
v2.0.3 preserves the legacy unrestricted behaviour when NOTEBOOKLM_VAULT_ROOT is unset, to keep existing single-user local setups working. To enable containment, set NOTEBOOKLM_VAULT_ROOT in the server environment to a directory that should bound all vault writes.
Credit
Reported by @mcfly-zzh — thanks for the careful diagnosis and follow-up verification.
Software afectado
Haz clic en una tecnología para ver todas sus vulnerabilidades.
| Plataforma | Paquete | Versiones vulnerables | Corregida en |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paquete de npm | @roomi-fields/notebooklm-mcp | >= 1.6.0, < 2.0.3 | 2.0.3 |
Referencias
- https://github.com/roomi-fields/notebooklm-mcp/security/advisories/GHSA-jjhp-8crj-mppq
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-61647
- https://github.com/roomi-fields/notebooklm-mcp/issues/15
- https://github.com/roomi-fields/notebooklm-mcp/commit/13828d9ff3933839ce14c1797d3b20a6bb7694a6
- https://github.com/roomi-fields/notebooklm-mcp
- https://github.com/roomi-fields/notebooklm-mcp/releases/tag/v2.0.3
- Vector CVSS
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N- Debilidad (CWE)
CWE-22, CWE-73- Plataforma
- npm
- Paquete
@roomi-fields/notebooklm-mcp- Publicada
- 22.09.2026
- Actualizado
- 11.10.2026 10:22
Fuentes y licencias
OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-jjhp-8crj-mppq - CC BY 4.0
Historial de vulnerabilidades: @roomi-fields/notebooklm-mcp
Todas las vulnerabilidades publicadas de este paquete (Paquete de npm), de la más reciente a la más antigua. Muestra si es un fallo aislado o un paquete que hay que vigilar.
Esta es la única vulnerabilidad conocida de este paquete.
Identifica las vulnerabilidades de tu aplicación
Con la integración de DockRay y el inventario de software activado, DockRay compara las versiones notificadas de los componentes con las vulnerabilidades conocidas y avisa de las coincidencias confirmadas. La cobertura depende de la tecnología compatible y de los avisos disponibles.