Alta

FUXA: Unauthenticated SSRF via Socket.IO DEVICE_WEBAPI_REQUEST and DEVICE_PROPERTY with response reading

  • Publicada: 08.06.2026
  • Actualizado: 11.10.2026 10:22

Summary

An unauthenticated attacker (Alice) connects to FUXA's Socket.IO endpoint and emits a device-webapi-request event whose property.address field names an arbitrary URL. FUXA's DEVICE_WEBAPI_REQUEST handler at server/runtime/index.js:296 calls axios.get(address) server-side and broadcasts the full response body back on the same event via io.emit. The companion handler DEVICE_PROPERTY at server/runtime/index.js:153 has the same miss against OPC UA and ODBC endpoints. Both handlers skip the isSocketWriteAuthorized() check that the other write-capable events (DEVICE_VALUES at line 182, DEVICE_ENABLE at line 358) call. Alice reads cloud instance metadata, scans internal services, and connects to any OPC UA server or ODBC database the FUXA host can reach, then receives the results.

Details

Vulnerable handlers: server/runtime/index.js:153-171, 296-316:

js
socket.on(Events.IoEventTypes.DEVICE_PROPERTY, (message) => {
    try {
        if (message && message.endpoint && message.type) {
            devices.getSupportedProperty(message.endpoint, message.type).then(result => {
                message.result = result;
                io.emit(Events.IoEventTypes.DEVICE_PROPERTY, message);
            })
            // ...
        }
    }
    // ...
});

socket.on(Events.IoEventTypes.DEVICE_WEBAPI_REQUEST, (message) => {
    try {
        if (message && message.property) {
            devices.getRequestResult(message.property).then(result => {
                message.result = result;
                io.emit(Events.IoEventTypes.DEVICE_WEBAPI_REQUEST, message);
            })
            // ...
        }
    }
    // ...
});

Sink: server/runtime/devices/httprequest/index.js:471 for the webapi path:

js
if (property.method === 'GET') {
    axios.get(property.address).then(res => {
        resolve(res.data);
    // ...

Alice fully controls property.address, and io.emit echoes the response body back on the same event. For the ODBC variant, server/runtime/devices/odbc/index.js builds the connection string from endpoint.address plus endpoint.uid and endpoint.pwd, so Alice supplies credentials and targets any reachable ODBC server.

Contrast: server/runtime/index.js:182 (the DEVICE_VALUES write handler) gates the exact same kind of action behind isSocketWriteAuthorized(socket). The two handlers above skip that check.

Reachability: neither handler performs any authorization check, so both modes reach the sinks. secureEnabled=true does not close the gap because the Socket.IO connect block at server/runtime/index.js:114-120 auto-issues a guest token to any client that connects without one, and the handlers run regardless of socket.isAuthenticated. This is the same pattern GHSA-vwcg-c828-9822's note warned about: enabling authentication does not mitigate the missing check here.

Impact

Alice uses FUXA as a read-SSRF oracle against any HTTP(S) service the FUXA host can reach, with the response body delivered back to her Socket.IO session. On cloud-hosted SCADA deployments this exfiltrates IAM credentials from the instance metadata service. On OT networks it reaches internal OPC UA servers, ODBC databases, and administrative consoles that have no other external exposure. The ODBC variant accepts attacker-supplied credentials, so Alice authenticates to any ODBC server that trusts connections from the FUXA host. The attack works against secureEnabled=true deployments as well as the default; no operator interaction required.

CVSS 3.1: AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N (High, 8.2). CWE-918.

Recommended Fix

Add the existing isSocketWriteAuthorized(socket) check at the top of both handlers, matching the pattern used by DEVICE_VALUES and DEVICE_ENABLE. Also switch io.emit to socket.emit so the response scopes to the requesting socket instead of broadcasting to every connected client. For defense in depth, validate property.address against an allowlist of schemes and reject private, loopback, and link-local address ranges before calling axios.get or the device connect paths.

js
socket.on(Events.IoEventTypes.DEVICE_WEBAPI_REQUEST, (message) => {
    try {
        if (!isSocketWriteAuthorized(socket)) {
            logger.warn(`${Events.IoEventTypes.DEVICE_WEBAPI_REQUEST}: unauthorized request from ${socket.userId || 'guest'}`);
            return;
        }
        if (message && message.property) {
            // ... validate property.address against allowlist ...
            devices.getRequestResult(message.property).then(result => {
                message.result = result;
                socket.emit(Events.IoEventTypes.DEVICE_WEBAPI_REQUEST, message);
            })
            // ...
        }
    }
    // ...
});

Apply the same three changes (auth check, socket.emit, address validation) to DEVICE_PROPERTY.


A fix is available at https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/releases/tag/v1.3.2.


Found by aisafe.io

Software afectado

Haz clic en una tecnología para ver todas sus vulnerabilidades.

PlataformaPaqueteVersiones vulnerablesCorregida en
Paquete de npm fuxa-server <= 1.1.14-1243 sin corrección

Referencias

Puntuación CVSS 8.2/10
Vector CVSS
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
Debilidad (CWE)
CWE-918
Plataforma
npm
Paquete
fuxa-server
Publicada
08.06.2026
Actualizado
11.10.2026 10:22

Fuentes y licencias

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-w86f-rf9w-h3x6 - CC BY 4.0

Historial de vulnerabilidades: fuxa-server

Todas las vulnerabilidades publicadas de este paquete (Paquete de npm), de la más reciente a la más antigua. Muestra si es un fallo aislado o un paquete que hay que vigilar.

Todas (21) en el archivo
Entradas en total
21
Primera → última
09.2023 06.2026
Sin corrección
9
Explotada en ataques
0

Distribución por gravedad

  • Crítica 8
  • Alta 10
  • Media 3

Divulgaciones por año

  1. 2023: 3
  2. 2024: 0
  3. 2025: 0
  4. 2026: 18
Gravedad:
  1. FUXA: Unauthenticated SSRF via Socket.IO DEVICE_WEBAPI_REQUEST and DEVICE_PROPERTY with response reading esta entrada
    Alta · 8.2 CVE-2026-47719 <= 1.1.14-1243 sin corrección
  2. Alta CVE-2026-25951 < 1.2.11 1.2.11
  3. Crítica CVE-2026-25939 >= 1.2.8, < 1.2.11 1.2.11
  4. Crítica CVE-2026-25938 >= 1.2.8, < 1.2.11 1.2.11
  5. Crítica CVE-2026-25752 < 1.2.10 1.2.10
  6. Crítica CVE-2026-25751 < 1.2.10 1.2.10
  7. Alta · 9.8 CVE-2025-69983 <= 1.2.7 sin corrección
  8. Alta CVE-2025-69981 <= 1.2.7 sin corrección
  9. Alta CVE-2025-69970 <= 1.2.7 sin corrección
  10. Crítica · 9.8 CVE-2023-31719 <= 1.1.12 sin corrección
  11. Alta · 7.5 CVE-2023-31718 <= 1.1.12 sin corrección
  12. Alta · 7.5 CVE-2023-31717 <= 1.1.12 sin corrección

Identifica las vulnerabilidades de tu aplicación

Con la integración de DockRay y el inventario de software activado, DockRay compara las versiones notificadas de los componentes con las vulnerabilidades conocidas y avisa de las coincidencias confirmadas. La cobertura depende de la tecnología compatible y de los avisos disponibles.

Conectar tu aplicación
Newsletter DockRay

La seguridad de tus aplicaciones en tu correo

Vulnerabilidades importantes, recomendaciones concretas y consejos prácticos para tus aplicaciones. Elige tus tecnologías y sigue lo que importa para tu proyecto.

  • Un resumen diario de nuevas vulnerabilidades, también las críticas.
  • Avisos sobre actualizaciones importantes.
  • Consejos prácticos sobre seguridad y monitorización de aplicaciones.

Déjalo vacío para recibir avisos de todas las tecnologías.

Suscripción gratuita. Date de baja con un clic en cualquier correo.