Giskard Agents have Server-side template injection via ChatWorkflow.chat() using non-sandboxed Jinja2 Environment
Summary
ChatWorkflow.chat(message) passes its string argument directly as a Jinja2 template source to a non-sandboxed Environment. A developer who passes user input to this method enables full remote code execution via Jinja2 class traversal.
The method name chat and parameter name message naturally invite passing user input directly, but the string is silently parsed as a Jinja2 template, not treated as plain text.
Root Cause
libs/giskard-agents/src/giskard/agents/workflow.py line ~261:
def chat(self, message: str | Message | MessageTemplate, role: Role = "user") -> Self:
if isinstance(message, str):
message = MessageTemplate(role=role, content_template=message)
The string becomes content_template, which is parsed by from_string():
libs/giskard-agents/src/giskard/agents/templates/message.py lines 14-15:
def render(self, **kwargs: Any) -> Message:
template = _inline_env.from_string(self.content_template)
rendered_content = template.render(**kwargs)
The Jinja2 Environment is not sandboxed:
libs/giskard-agents/src/giskard/agents/templates/environment.py line 37:
_inline_env = Environment(
autoescape=False,
# Not SandboxedEnvironment
)
Proof of Concept
from jinja2 import Environment
env = Environment() # Same as giskard's _inline_env
# Class traversal reaches os.popen
t = env.from_string("{{ ''.__class__.__mro__[1].__subclasses__() | length }}")
print(t.render()) # 342 accessible subclasses
# Full RCE payload (subclass index varies by Python version)
# {{ ''.__class__.__mro__[1].__subclasses__()[INDEX].__init__.__globals__['os'].popen('id').read() }}
A developer building a chatbot:
workflow = ChatWorkflow(generator=my_llm)
workflow = workflow.chat(user_input) # user_input parsed as Jinja2 template
result = await workflow.run() # RCE if user_input contains {{ payload }}
Note: using .with_inputs(var=user_data) is safe because variable values are not parsed as templates. The issue is only when user strings are passed directly to chat().
Impact
Remote code execution on the server hosting any application built with giskard-agents that passes user input to ChatWorkflow.chat(). Attacker can execute system commands, read files, access environment variables.
Affects giskard-agents <=0.3.3 and 1.0.x alpha. Patched in giskard-agents 0.3.4 (stable) and 1.0.2b1 (pre-release).
Mitigation
Update to 0.3.4 (or 1.0.2b1 for the pre-release branch) which includes the fix.
The fix replaces the unsandboxed Jinja2 Environment with SandboxedEnvironment, which blocks attribute access to dunder methods and prevents class traversal chains. SandboxedEnvironment blocks access to attributes starting with _, preventing the __class__.__mro__ traversal chain.
Software afectado
Haz clic en una tecnología para ver todas sus vulnerabilidades.
| Plataforma | Paquete | Versiones vulnerables | Corregida en |
|---|---|---|---|
| Python (PyPI) | giskard-agents | < 0.3.4, >= 1.0.1a1, < 1.0.2b1 | 0.3.4, 1.0.2b1 |
Referencias
- Vector CVSS
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N- Debilidad (CWE)
CWE-1336- Plataforma
- Python (PyPI)
- Paquete
giskard-agents- Publicada
- 27.03.2026
- Actualizado
- 11.10.2026 14:17
Fuentes y licencias
OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - PYSEC-2026-2487 - PyPA Advisory Database; CC BY 4.0
OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-frv4-x25r-588m - CC BY 4.0
Historial de vulnerabilidades: giskard-agents
Todas las vulnerabilidades publicadas de este paquete (Python (PyPI)), de la más reciente a la más antigua. Muestra si es un fallo aislado o un paquete que hay que vigilar.
Esta es la única vulnerabilidad conocida de este paquete.
Identifica las vulnerabilidades de tu aplicación
Con la integración de DockRay y el inventario de software activado, DockRay compara las versiones notificadas de los componentes con las vulnerabilidades conocidas y avisa de las coincidencias confirmadas. La cobertura depende de la tecnología compatible y de los avisos disponibles.