Media

vLLM has a Weakness in MultiModalHasher Image Hashing Implementation

  • Publicada: 28.05.2025
  • Actualizado: 11.10.2026 14:19

Summary

In the file vllm/multimodal/hasher.py, the MultiModalHasher class has a security and data integrity issue in its image hashing method. Currently, it serializes PIL.Image.Image objects using only obj.tobytes(), which returns only the raw pixel data, without including metadata such as the image’s shape (width, height, mode). As a result, two images of different sizes (e.g., 30x100 and 100x30) with the same pixel byte sequence could generate the same hash value. This may lead to hash collisions, incorrect cache hits, and even data leakage or security risks.

Details

  • Affected file: vllm/multimodal/hasher.py
  • Affected method: MultiModalHasher.serialize_item https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/9420a1fc30af1a632bbc2c66eb8668f3af41f026/vllm/multimodal/hasher.py#L34-L35
  • Current behavior: For Image.Image instances, only obj.tobytes() is used for hashing.
  • Problem description: obj.tobytes() does not include the image’s width, height, or mode metadata.
  • Impact: Two images with the same pixel byte sequence but different sizes could be regarded as the same image by the cache and hashing system, which may result in:
    • Incorrect cache hits, leading to abnormal responses
    • Deliberate construction of images with different meanings but the same hash value

Recommendation

In the serialize_item method, serialization of Image.Image objects should include not only pixel data, but also all critical metadata—such as dimensions (size), color mode (mode), format, and especially the info dictionary. The info dictionary is particularly important in palette-based images (e.g., mode 'P'), where the palette itself is stored in info. Ignoring info can result in hash collisions between visually distinct images with the same pixel bytes but different palettes or metadata. This can lead to incorrect cache hits or even data leakage.

Summary:
Serializing only the raw pixel data is insecure. Always include all image metadata (size, mode, format, info) in the hash calculation to prevent collisions, especially in cases like palette-based images.

Impact for other modalities For the influence of other modalities, since the video modality is transformed into a multi-dimensional array containing the length, width, time, etc. of the video, the same problem exists due to the incorrect sequence of numpy as well.

For audio, since the momo function is not enabled in librosa.load, the loaded audio is automatically encoded into single channels by librosa and returns a one-dimensional array of numpy, thus keeping the structure of numpy fixed and not affected by this issue.

Fixes

Software afectado

Haz clic en una tecnología para ver todas sus vulnerabilidades.

PlataformaPaqueteVersiones vulnerablesCorregida en
Python (PyPI) vllm >= 0.7.0, < 0.9.0 0.9.0

Referencias

Puntuación CVSS 4.2/10
Vector CVSS
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
Debilidad (CWE)
CWE-1023, CWE-1288
Plataforma
Python (PyPI)
Paquete
vllm
Publicada
28.05.2025
Actualizado
11.10.2026 14:19

Fuentes y licencias

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - PYSEC-2025-43 - PyPA Advisory Database; CC BY 4.0

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-c65p-x677-fgj6 - CC BY 4.0

Historial de vulnerabilidades: vllm

Todas las vulnerabilidades publicadas de este paquete (Python (PyPI)), de la más reciente a la más antigua. Muestra si es un fallo aislado o un paquete que hay que vigilar.

Todas (94) en el archivo
Entradas en total
94
Primera → última
09.2024 10.2026
Sin corrección
5
Explotada en ataques
0

Distribución por gravedad

  • Crítica 9
  • Alta 23
  • Media 47
  • Baja 4
  • Sin evaluar 11

Divulgaciones por año

  1. 2024: 2
  2. 2025: 30
  3. 2026: 62
Gravedad:
  1. vLLM has a Weakness in MultiModalHasher Image Hashing Implementation esta entrada
    Media · 4.2 CVE-2025-46722 >= 0.7.0, < 0.9.0 0.9.0
  2. Alta · 7.5 CVE-2026-54234 >= 0.17.1, < 0.24.0 0.24.0
  3. Alta CVE-2026-55514 >= 0.12.0, < 0.24.0 0.24.0
  4. Crítica · 9.1 CVE-2026-48746 >= 0.3.0, < 0.22.0 0.22.0
  5. Crítica · 9.8 CVE-2026-22778 >= 0.8.3, < 0.14.1 0.14.1
  6. Alta · 8.8 CVE-2026-22807 >= 0.10.1, < 0.14.0 0.14.0
  7. Alta · 8.8 CVE-2026-56340 >= 0.10.2, < 0.13.0 0.13.0
  8. Alta · 6.5 CVE-2025-62372 >= 0.5.5, < 0.11.1 0.11.1
  9. Alta · 8.8 CVE-2025-62164 >= 0.10.2, < 0.11.1 0.11.1
  10. Alta · 7.5 CVE-2025-59425 < 0.11.0 0.11.0
  11. Alta · 8.8 CVE-2025-9141 >= 0.10.0, < 0.10.1.1 0.10.1.1
Mostrar más (12) Mostrando 21 de 33

Identifica las vulnerabilidades de tu aplicación

Con la integración de DockRay y el inventario de software activado, DockRay compara las versiones notificadas de los componentes con las vulnerabilidades conocidas y avisa de las coincidencias confirmadas. La cobertura depende de la tecnología compatible y de los avisos disponibles.

Conectar tu aplicación
Newsletter DockRay

La seguridad de tus aplicaciones en tu correo

Vulnerabilidades importantes, recomendaciones concretas y consejos prácticos para tus aplicaciones. Elige tus tecnologías y sigue lo que importa para tu proyecto.

  • Un resumen diario de nuevas vulnerabilidades, también las críticas.
  • Avisos sobre actualizaciones importantes.
  • Consejos prácticos sobre seguridad y monitorización de aplicaciones.

Déjalo vacío para recibir avisos de todas las tecnologías.

Suscripción gratuita. Date de baja con un clic en cualquier correo.