Medium

Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can suppress calendar alerts instance-wide via a non-numeric alert value

  • Disclosed: 10.09.2026
  • Updated: 11.10.2026 15:18

Any authenticated user can suppress calendar alerts instance-wide via a non-numeric alert value

Summary

Calendar events carry a free-form meta object that is stored exactly as submitted, with no validation of the values inside it. The scheduler reads the per-event alert offset out of that object in a single pass that covers every user's upcoming events, and compares it numerically without checking that it is a number. Any verified user could store a text value there, which made the comparison raise and abort the whole pass, so no calendar reminder fired for anyone on the instance while that event stayed inside the lookahead window.

Preconditions

  • Calendar is enabled (ENABLE_CALENDAR / calendar.enable, default True).
  • The attacker is a verified user (role user or admin) holding the calendar feature permission, which is granted to all users by default (USER_PERMISSIONS_FEATURES_CALENDAR, default True).
  • The event's start time falls inside the scheduler's one hour lookahead window, so the shared alert pass selects it.

No admin access, no shared calendar, no recurrence rule and no open registration are required, an invited account is enough. Deployments running with the calendar disabled, or with the calendar feature permission removed from regular users, are not affected.

Impact

Availability loss on one feature, affecting every user on the instance. While a single event carrying a non-numeric alert value sat in the upcoming window, the shared alert pass raised before emitting anything, so no user received calendar alerts and no event was recorded as alerted. The same events were selected again on the next poll, so the suppression lasted as long as the event stayed in the window, roughly one hour per event, and could be sustained by storing a new one. Every user on a default deployment holds the permission needed to do this.

Chat, timers, automations and the HTTP API kept working throughout, and authenticated calendar reads continued to succeed. There is no crash, no code execution, and no access to other users' data. Alerts resumed on their own once the event left the window or was deleted.

Fix

Fixed in https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/pull/28790, released in 0.11.1. The scheduler now treats any non-numeric alert value as unset and falls back to the default alert offset, so a stored text value can no longer interrupt the pass. Upgrading is sufficient and no configuration change is required. Events already holding a bad value simply revert to the default alert timing.

Root cause

Affected component: the upcoming-event lookup in the calendar event model, which the scheduler's alert pass calls every poll. Affected setup: every build carrying the calendar feature, which was introduced in 0.9.0.

Event meta is an untyped dictionary and was written to the database exactly as submitted, so nothing on the write path guaranteed that the alert offset was a number. The alert pass then read that value back and compared it numerically on the assumption that the write path had already constrained it, and the loop had no per-event error handling. Because a single background pass serves the whole instance rather than one user at a time, one unusable value from one user aborted the pass for everyone.

Proof of concept

Reported with a scripted reproduction against 0.11.0 (ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:latest) with the calendar enabled and two ordinary user accounts. The first account created an upcoming event with the alert offset stored as the text "5", the second created a normal upcoming event with a numeric offset. Across several scheduler polls the second user's event was never marked as alerted and no alert was delivered, while the server logged a type error from the alert pass on each poll. Health checks and authenticated calendar reads returned normally during the fault. After the first account's event was deleted, the second user's event was marked as alerted on the next poll and alerting resumed.

Credits

Binbin Xu​ of Tencent YUNDING LAB CodeBuddy Security.

Affected software

Click a technology to see all vulnerabilities affecting it.

PlatformPackageVulnerable versionsFixed in
Python (PyPI) open-webui >= 0.9.0, < 0.11.1 0.11.1

References

CVSS score 4.3/10
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Weakness (CWE)
CWE-1287, CWE-754
Platform
Python (PyPI)
Package
open-webui
Disclosed
10.09.2026
Updated
11.10.2026 15:18

Sources and licenses

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - PYSEC-2026-4126 - PyPA Advisory Database; CC BY 4.0

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-v39v-59xw-j98g - CC BY 4.0

Vulnerability history: open-webui

All published vulnerabilities of this package (Python (PyPI)), newest first. Shows whether this is a one-off slip or a package that needs watching.

All (161) in the archive
Total entries
161
First → latest
08.2024 09.2026
Without a fix
11
Exploited in attacks
0

Severity breakdown

  • Critical 1
  • High 77
  • Medium 75
  • Low 8

Disclosures per year

  1. 2024: 3
  2. 2025: 21
  3. 2026: 137
Severity:
  1. Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can suppress calendar alerts instance-wide via a non-numeric alert value this entry
    Medium · 4.3 CVE-2026-87012 >= 0.9.0, < 0.11.1 0.11.1
  2. High · 7.7 CVE-2026-59221 >= 0.9.6, < 0.10.0 0.10.0
  3. High · 7.3 CVE-2026-59214 < 0.10.0 0.10.0
  4. High · 8.7 CVE-2026-54011 < 0.9.6 0.9.6
  5. High · 7.1 CVE-2026-45349 < 0.9.0 0.9.0
  6. High · 7.7 CVE-2026-45303 < 0.6.5 0.6.5
  7. High · 7.1 CVE-2026-44569 < 0.6.19 0.6.19
  8. High · 8.1 CVE-2026-44565 < 0.6.10 0.6.10
  9. High · 7.3 CVE-2026-44566 < 0.1.124 0.1.124
  10. High · 7.3 CVE-2026-44567 < 0.1.124 0.1.124
  11. High · 7.3 CVE-2026-44549 < 0.8.0 0.8.0
  12. Critical · 9.1 CVE-2026-44551 < 0.9.0 0.9.0
  13. High · 7.3 CVE-2026-44721 < 0.9.0 0.9.0
  14. High · 7.7 CVE-2026-34222 < 0.8.11 0.8.11
  15. High · 8.4 CVE-2024-7990 <= 0.3.8 no fix
  16. High · 8.0 CVE-2024-7806 < 0.3.33 0.3.33
  17. High · 7.6 CVE-2024-7053 <= 0.3.8 no fix
  18. High · 8.1 CVE-2024-7043 < 0.3.16 0.3.16
  19. High · 7.5 CVE-2024-7036 <= 0.3.8 no fix
  20. High · 7.5 ghsa-w466-2wfc-8g58 <= 0.3.32 no fix
  21. High · 7.5 CVE-2024-12534 <= 0.3.32 no fix
  22. High · 7.5 CVE-2024-12537 <= 0.3.32 no fix

Know which vulnerabilities affect your application

With the DockRay integration and software inventory enabled, DockRay checks reported component versions against known vulnerabilities and notifies you about confirmed matches. Coverage depends on the supported technology and available advisory data.

Connect your application
DockRay newsletter

Application security in your inbox

Important vulnerabilities, actionable guidance and practical advice for your applications. Choose your technologies and follow what matters to your project.

  • A daily digest of new vulnerabilities, critical ones included.
  • Notifications about important updates.
  • Practical advice on application security and monitoring.

Leave empty to receive updates for every technology.

Free to subscribe. Unsubscribe with one click in any email.