Medium

jackson-databind: @JsonView bypassed for @JsonUnwrapped container properties on deserialization

  • Disclosed: 21.07.2026
  • Updated: 19.10.2026 22:17

Summary

UnwrappedPropertyHandler.processUnwrapped() replays the buffered JSON for a @JsonUnwrapped property by iterating its properties and calling prop.deserializeAndSet() with no prop.visibleInView(ctxt.getActiveView()) guard — the exact guard processUnwrappedCreatorProperties() received in the #5971 / GHSA-rcqc-6cw3-h962 fix, and the guard BeanDeserializer.deserializeWithUnwrapped applies to directly-matched properties. As a result, a property annotated with both @JsonView(PrivilegedView.class) and @JsonUnwrapped is written from attacker JSON even when deserializing under a more-restrictive active view.

Correction to the original framing (runtime-verified): the gap is NOT a per-field inner @JsonView (the unwrapped sub-object's own BeanDeserializer gates inner fields correctly). The unchecked gate is the view of the unwrapped CONTAINER property.

Intent proof (runtime, 2.x HEAD 21dd70dd and 3.x HEAD 7a5939d6)

An @JsonView(AdminView) property that is NOT @JsonUnwrapped → null under PublicView (correctly gated). The identical property WITH @JsonUnwrapped → fully populated (bypass). The fix the creator path already received, not applied to the regular-property method.

Impact — write-side mass-assignment / privilege escalation

@JsonView is commonly used as a write-side authorization guard: a public endpoint binds the body under readerWithView(PublicView.class) and groups privileged state in a nested object whose container property is @JsonView(AdminView). When that property is @JsonUnwrapped, an untrusted caller mass-assigns it. PoC: a self-service registration where AccountFlags{role,approved,creditBalance} is @JsonView(AdminView) @JsonUnwrapped; attacker JSON {role:ADMIN,approved:true,creditBalance:1000000} under PublicView binds all three → approved admin with arbitrary balance. The failing gate is a WRITE gate, hence integrity-high (C:N/I:H/A:N); no worse than the C:L/I:L parent and arguably higher as @JsonView-as-write-guard is the exact use case #5971/#5969 defended.

Affected

  • com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind 2.x: confirmed bypass at 21dd70dd (== released 2.21.4 / 2.22.0 line; includes the #5973 backport). DEFAULT_VIEW_INCLUSION default=true.
  • tools.jackson.core:jackson-databind 3.x: confirmed bypass at HEAD 7a5939d6 (latest 3.x). DEFAULT_VIEW_INCLUSION default=false → the stock-config repro is the common shape where privileged inner fields are individually @JsonView(PublicView) and the developer relies on the container @JsonView(AdminView); the 3.x PoC mass-assigns role/approved/creditBalance under PublicView. (The other simultaneous report's PoC was reportedly fixed on 3.x; this distinct container-property path is not.)

Additive variants (runtime-confirmed both branches; all closed by the same one-line guard)

  • nested @JsonUnwrapped (unwrapped-in-unwrapped) — recursive bypass.
  • merge / readerWithView(...).withValueToUpdate(...) (PATCH/partial-update) — bypass; non-unwrapped merge control gates correctly.
  • builder-based deserializer (@JsonDeserialize(builder=...)) — BuilderBasedDeserializer routes through the same processUnwrapped.
  • Honest non-findings: read-side serialization correctly honors views (no leak); @JsonAnySetter+view and @JsonTypeInfo+@JsonUnwrapped are separate/unsupported behaviors, not this bug.

Fix

Add prop.visibleInView(ctxt.getActiveView()) (when MapperFeature.DEFAULT_VIEW_INCLUSION/active-view applies) to the processUnwrapped() property loop, mirroring processUnwrappedCreatorProperties(). One change closes the impact PoC + all three variants across BeanDeserializer and BuilderBasedDeserializer. Full runnable PoCs (2.x + 3.x) + variant harnesses available on request.

Affected software

Click a technology to see all vulnerabilities affecting it.

PlatformPackageVulnerable versionsFixed in
Java / Kotlin (Maven) com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind >= 2.19.0, < 2.21.5, >= 2.0.0-RC1, < 2.18.9, >= 2.22.0, < 2.22.1 2.21.5, 2.18.9, 2.22.1
Java / Kotlin (Maven) tools.jackson.core:jackson-databind >= 3.0.0, < 3.1.5, >= 3.2.0, < 3.2.1 3.1.5, 3.2.1

References

CVSS score 6.5/10
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Weakness (CWE)
CWE-863
Platform
Java / Kotlin (Maven)
Package
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind, tools.jackson.core:jackson-databind
Disclosed
21.07.2026
Updated
19.10.2026 22:17

Sources and licenses

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-5gvw-p9qm-jgwh - CC BY 4.0

Vulnerability history: com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind

All published vulnerabilities of this package (Java / Kotlin (Maven)), newest first. Shows whether this is a one-off slip or a package that needs watching.

All (86) in the archive
Total entries
86
First → latest
10.2018 09.2026
Without a fix
0
Exploited in attacks
0

Severity breakdown

  • Critical 24
  • High 48
  • Medium 14

Disclosures per year

  1. 2018: 4
  2. 2019: 19
  3. 2020: 23
  4. 2021: 18
  5. 2022: 4
  6. 2023: 1
  7. 2024: 0
  8. 2025: 0
  9. 2026: 17
Severity:
  1. High · 7.5 CVE-2026-91777 >= 2.19.0, < 2.21.7, >= 2.5.0, < 2.18.11, >= 2.22.0, < 2.22.3 2.21.7, 2.18.11, 2.22.3
  2. High · 7.5 CVE-2026-91776 >= 2.0.0, < 2.18.11, >= 2.19.0, < 2.21.7, >= 2.22.0, < 2.22.3 2.18.11, 2.21.7, 2.22.3
  3. High · 7.5 CVE-2026-68497 >= 2.14.0, < 2.18.10, >= 2.19.0, < 2.21.6, >= 2.22.0, < 2.22.2 2.18.10, 2.21.6, 2.22.2
  4. jackson-databind: @JsonView bypassed for @JsonUnwrapped container properties on deserialization this entry
    Medium · 6.5 CVE-2026-59889 >= 2.19.0, < 2.21.5, >= 2.0.0-RC1, < 2.18.9, >= 2.22.0, < 2.22.1 2.21.5, 2.18.9, 2.22.1
  5. High · 8.1 CVE-2026-54513 >= 2.10.0, < 2.18.8, >= 2.19.0, < 2.21.4, >= 3.0.0, < 3.1.4 2.18.8, 2.21.4, 3.1.4
  6. High · 8.1 CVE-2026-54512 >= 2.10.0, < 2.18.8, >= 3.0.0, < 3.1.4, >= 2.19.0, < 2.21.4 2.18.8, 3.1.4, 2.21.4
  7. High · 7.5 CVE-2021-46877 >= 2.10.0, < 2.12.6, >= 2.13.0, < 2.13.1 2.12.6, 2.13.1
  8. High · 7.5 CVE-2022-42003 >= 2.4.0-rc1, < 2.12.7.1, >= 2.13.0, < 2.13.4.2 2.12.7.1, 2.13.4.2
  9. High · 7.5 CVE-2022-42004 >= 2.4.0-rc1, < 2.12.7.1, >= 2.13.0, < 2.13.4 2.12.7.1, 2.13.4
  10. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-10650 < 2.9.10.4 2.9.10.4
  11. High · 7.5 CVE-2020-36518 >= 2.13.0, < 2.13.2.1, < 2.12.6.1 2.13.2.1, 2.12.6.1
  12. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-36189 >= 2.7.0, < 2.9.10.8, < 2.6.7.5 2.9.10.8, 2.6.7.5
  13. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-36187 >= 2.0.0, < 2.9.10.8 2.9.10.8
  14. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-36188 >= 2.7.0, < 2.9.10.8, >= 2.0.0, < 2.6.7.5 2.9.10.8, 2.6.7.5
  15. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-36183 >= 2.7.00, < 2.9.10.8, >= 2.0.0, < 2.6.7.5 2.9.10.8, 2.6.7.5
  16. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-36184 >= 2.0.0, < 2.9.10.8 2.9.10.8
  17. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-36180 >= 2.7.0, < 2.9.10.8, >= 2.0.0, < 2.6.7.5 2.9.10.8, 2.6.7.5
  18. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-36181 >= 2.7.0, < 2.9.10.8, >= 2.0.0, < 2.6.7.5 2.9.10.8, 2.6.7.5
  19. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-36185 >= 2.0.0, < 2.9.10.8 2.9.10.8
  20. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-36179 >= 2.7.0, < 2.9.10.8, >= 2.0.0, < 2.6.7.5 2.9.10.8, 2.6.7.5
  21. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-36182 >= 2.7.0, < 2.9.10.8, >= 2.0.0, < 2.6.7.5 2.9.10.8, 2.6.7.5
  22. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-24750 >= 2.0, < 2.6.7.5, >= 2.7.0, < 2.9.10.6 2.6.7.5, 2.9.10.6
  23. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-35728 >= 2.0.0, < 2.9.10.8 2.9.10.8
  24. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-35491 >= 2.0.0, < 2.9.10.8 2.9.10.8
  25. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-35490 >= 2.0.0, < 2.9.10.8 2.9.10.8
  26. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-24616 >= 2.0.0, < 2.9.10.6 2.9.10.6
  27. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-36186 >= 2.0.0, < 2.9.10.8 2.9.10.8
  28. High · 7.5 CVE-2020-25649 >= 2.6.0, < 2.6.7.4, >= 2.7.0.0, < 2.9.10.7, >= 2.10.0.0, < 2.10.5.1 2.6.7.4, 2.9.10.7, 2.10.5.1
  29. High · 8.1 CVE-2021-20190 >= 2.7.0, < 2.9.10.7, < 2.6.7.5 2.9.10.7, 2.6.7.5
  30. High · 8.1 CVE-2018-5968 >= 2.8.0, < 2.8.11.1, >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.4, < 2.7.9.5 2.8.11.1, 2.9.4, 2.7.9.5
  31. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-14061 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.5 2.9.10.5
  32. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-14062 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.5 2.9.10.5
  33. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-14060 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.5 2.9.10.5
  34. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-14195 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.5 2.9.10.5
  35. High · 7.5 CVE-2018-12023 >= 2.7.0, < 2.7.9.4, >= 2.8.0, < 2.8.11.2, >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.6 2.7.9.4, 2.8.11.2, 2.9.6
  36. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2019-17267 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10, < 2.8.11.5 2.9.10, 2.8.11.5
  37. High · 8.8 CVE-2020-11112 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.4 2.9.10.4
  38. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2020-9547 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.4, >= 2.8.0, < 2.8.11.6, >= 2.0.0, < 2.7.9.7 2.9.10.4, 2.8.11.6, 2.7.9.7
  39. High CVE-2019-14893 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10 2.9.10
  40. High · 8.8 CVE-2020-10673 >= 2.7.0, < 2.9.10.4, >= 2.0.0, < 2.6.7.4 2.9.10.4, 2.6.7.4
  41. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2020-9548 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.4, >= 2.8.0, < 2.8.11.6, >= 2.0.0, < 2.7.9.7 2.9.10.4, 2.8.11.6, 2.7.9.7
  42. High · 7.5 CVE-2019-14892 < 2.6.7.3, >= 2.7.0, < 2.8.11.5, >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10 2.6.7.3, 2.8.11.5, 2.9.10
  43. High · 8.8 CVE-2020-10968 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.4 2.9.10.4
  44. High · 8.8 CVE-2020-11111 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.4 2.9.10.4
  45. High · 8.8 CVE-2020-11113 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.4 2.9.10.4
  46. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-11619 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.4 2.9.10.4
  47. High · 8.8 CVE-2020-10969 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.4 2.9.10.4
  48. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2020-9546 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.4 2.9.10.4
  49. High · 8.1 CVE-2020-11620 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.4 2.9.10.4
  50. High · 8.8 CVE-2020-10672 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.4 2.9.10.4
  51. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2020-8840 >= 2.0.0, < 2.6.7.4, >= 2.7.0, < 2.7.9.7, >= 2.8.0, < 2.8.11.5, >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.3 2.6.7.4, 2.7.9.7, 2.8.11.5, 2.9.10.3
  52. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2019-20330 >= 2.0.0, < 2.6.7.4, >= 2.7.0, < 2.7.9.7, >= 2.8.0, < 2.8.11.5, >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.2 2.6.7.4, 2.7.9.7, 2.8.11.5, 2.9.10.2
  53. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2019-17531 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.1, >= 2.7.0, < 2.8.11.5, < 2.6.7.3 2.9.10.1, 2.8.11.5, 2.6.7.3
  54. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2019-16943 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.1, >= 2.7.0, < 2.8.11.5, < 2.6.7.3 2.9.10.1, 2.8.11.5, 2.6.7.3
  55. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2019-16942 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.1, >= 2.7.0, < 2.8.11.5, >= 2.0.0, < 2.6.7.3 2.9.10.1, 2.8.11.5, 2.6.7.3
  56. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2019-16335 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10, >= 2.7.0, < 2.8.11.5, < 2.6.7.3 2.9.10, 2.8.11.5, 2.6.7.3
  57. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2019-14540 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10, >= 2.7.0, < 2.8.11.5, < 2.6.7.3 2.9.10, 2.8.11.5, 2.6.7.3
  58. High · 7.5 CVE-2019-14439 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.9.2, >= 2.8.0, < 2.8.11.4, >= 2.7.0, < 2.7.9.6, < 2.6.7.3 2.9.9.2, 2.8.11.4, 2.7.9.6, 2.6.7.3
  59. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2019-14379 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.9.2, >= 2.8.0, < 2.8.11.4, < 2.7.9.6 2.9.9.2, 2.8.11.4, 2.7.9.6
  60. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2018-11307 >= 2.0.0, < 2.7.9.4, >= 2.8.0, < 2.8.11.2, >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.6 2.7.9.4, 2.8.11.2, 2.9.6
Show more (13) Showing 60 of 73

Know which vulnerabilities affect your application

With the DockRay integration and software inventory enabled, DockRay checks reported component versions against known vulnerabilities and notifies you about confirmed matches. Coverage depends on the supported technology and available advisory data.

Connect your application
DockRay newsletter

Application security in your inbox

Important vulnerabilities, actionable guidance and practical advice for your applications. Choose your technologies and follow what matters to your project.

  • A daily digest of new vulnerabilities, critical ones included.
  • Notifications about important updates.
  • Practical advice on application security and monitoring.

Leave empty to receive updates for every technology.

Free to subscribe. Unsubscribe with one click in any email.