High

Open WebUI: Low-privilege authenticated users can enumerate and stop global background tasks, causing system-wide chat disruption

  • Disclosed: 14.05.2026
  • Updated: 11.10.2026 14:18

Summary

Any authenticated user with low privileges can enumerate active background tasks across the system and stop tasks belonging to other users via the GET /api/tasks and POST /api/tasks/stop/{task_id} methods. This allows a casual user to disrupt system-wide chat usage by continuously canceling other users' active tasks. This is a real authorization vulnerability affecting integrity and usability in multi-user deployments.

Details

Open WebUI exposes GET /api/tasks and POST /api/tasks/stop/{task_id} to any verified user. These endpoints operate on a global task namespace and accept raw task_id values without checking whether the task belongs to the current caller.

As a result, a normal authenticated user can enumerate active global task IDs and stop tasks belonging to other users.

Root cause:

  1. Route authorization is too weak.

In backend/open_webui/main.py, both endpoints only require get_verified_user:

python
@app.post('/api/tasks/stop/{task_id}')
async def stop_task_endpoint(request: Request, task_id: str, user=Depends(get_verified_user)):
    result = await stop_task(request.app.state.redis, task_id)

@app.get('/api/tasks')
async def list_tasks_endpoint(request: Request, user=Depends(get_verified_user)):
    return {'tasks': await list_tasks(request.app.state.redis)}

get_verified_user accepts both user and admin roles in backend/open_webui/utils/auth.py.

  1. The helper operates on a global namespace.

In backend/open_webui/tasks.py, task listing is global:

python
async def list_tasks(redis):
    if redis:
        return await redis_list_tasks(redis)
    return list(tasks.keys())

In backend/open_webui/tasks.py, task stopping is by raw task_id:

python
async def stop_task(redis, task_id: str):
    if redis:
        item_id = await redis.hget(REDIS_TASKS_KEY, task_id)
        await redis_send_command(redis, {'action': 'stop', 'task_id': task_id})
        await redis_cleanup_task(redis, task_id, item_id or None)

There is no owner check, no user_id check, and no mapping from task_id back to the current caller before stop or cleanup.

This also appears unintended because the codebase already has a scoped route, GET /api/tasks/chat/{chat_id}, which checks whether the chat belongs to the current user before returning task IDs.

Relevant code references:

  • backend/open_webui/main.py:1975
  • backend/open_webui/main.py:1984
  • backend/open_webui/main.py:1989
  • backend/open_webui/tasks.py:127
  • backend/open_webui/tasks.py:145
  • backend/open_webui/utils/auth.py:415

Suggested remediation:

  • Store task ownership metadata such as user_id and chat_id, then enforce owner-only access for non-admin users
  • Suggested implementation locations:
    • backend/open_webui/main.py: add authentication checks for /api/tasks and /api/tasks/stop/{task_id}
    • backend/open_webui/tasks.py: add support for storing/querying task ownership metadata such as user_id and chat_id, and support owner-scoped listing/stopping

PoC

Preconditions:

  • Default main branch deployment
  • Authentication enabled
  • Two normal user accounts, or any multi-user deployment where the attacker has one authenticated non-admin account
  • At least one task actively running for another user

This does not require any weakened security settings.

PoC objective:

  1. Show that a non-admin user can see global active task IDs that are not their own
  2. Show that the same user can stop another user's active task

Reproduction steps:

Step 1. Victim starts a long-running task

Using the UI, User A starts a long response generation or another background task and leaves it running.

Expected security model: User B should not be able to see or control User A's task.

Step 2. Attacker enumerates global task IDs

Using User B's authenticated token:

bash
curl -i -H "Authorization: Bearer <USER_B_TOKEN>" http://<open-webui-host>/api/tasks

Expected result:

  • only User B's own task IDs should be returned, or
  • the endpoint should be admin-only

Actual result: the response returns the global active task list.

Example response shape:

js
{"tasks":["<task-id-a>","<task-id-b>"]}

This exposes task IDs belonging to other users.

Step 3. Attacker stops a foreign task

Pick a task ID that belongs to User A and send:

bash
curl -i -X POST -H "Authorization: Bearer <USER_B_TOKEN>" http://<open-webui-host>/api/tasks/stop/<FOREIGN_TASK_ID>

Expected result:

  • 403 Forbidden, or
  • 404 Not Found for non-owned tasks, or
  • admin-only access

Actual result: the server accepts the request and attempts to stop the foreign task.

Example response shape:

js
{"status":true,"message":"Task <FOREIGN_TASK_ID> stopped."}

Step 4. Observe boundary violation

User A's running task is interrupted or disappears from the active task set even though User B does not own it.

What actions become possible that should not be possible:

  • enumerate globally active task IDs across users
  • cancel another user's in-progress generation or background work
  • repeat this for every returned task ID, causing broad cross-user disruption

Copy-paste PoC summary:

  1. Enumerate all active tasks as a normal non-admin user
bash
curl -s -H "Authorization: Bearer <USER_B_TOKEN>" http://<open-webui-host>/api/tasks
  1. Stop a task that does not belong to that user
bash
curl -s -X POST -H "Authorization: Bearer <USER_B_TOKEN>" http://<open-webui-host>/api/tasks/stop/<FOREIGN_TASK_ID>

Impact

Type of vulnerability: broken object-level authorization affecting a global runtime control-plane endpoint.

Who is impacted:

  • all users in a multi-user Open WebUI deployment
  • any user currently running a background task, especially chat generation tasks
  • administrators indirectly, because normal users can disrupt system-wide usage without admin privileges

Direct impact:

  • cross-user task ID disclosure
  • cross-user task cancellation

Practical impact:

  • interruption of long-running chat responses
  • interruption of background indexing or ingestion tasks associated with shared runtime jobs
  • one ordinary authenticated low-privilege user can continuously poll /api/tasks and immediately cancel every newly created active task
  • with a simple loop or script, this becomes a practical persistent denial-of-service against chat usage for all users on the instance
  • in a multi-user deployment, normal users may be unable to complete any chat generation while the attacker continues polling and cancelling tasks

Why severity is meaningful:

  • privileges required: low, only an authenticated non-admin account
  • scope: cross-user
  • impact class: integrity and availability
  • exploitation complexity: low once logged in

This is not full account takeover or privilege escalation, but it enables platform-wide operational disruption from a low-privilege account. In practice, sustained exploitation can make chat functionality effectively unusable for other users on the system.

Resolution

Fixed in commit e7ff4768f (#23454, "Add ownership checks to global task endpoints"), first released in v0.9.0 (Apr 2026).

The fix takes a simpler approach than per-task ownership tracking, which would have required a schema change to attribute every task to a user_id:

  • GET /api/tasks and POST /api/tasks/stop/{task_id} are restricted to admin-only via Depends(get_admin_user). Cross-user enumeration and termination are no longer reachable from a non-admin account.
  • A new scoped POST /api/tasks/chat/{chat_id}/stop endpoint covers the legitimate non-admin use case (a user stopping their own in-progress generation), reusing the same chat-ownership check the existing GET /api/tasks/chat/{chat_id} already enforces.

CVE-2025-63681 was a prior disclosure of the same authorization gap against v0.6.33; the fix in v0.9.0 also resolves that.

Users on >= 0.9.0 are not affected.

Affected software

Click a technology to see all vulnerabilities affecting it.

PlatformPackageVulnerable versionsFixed in
Python (PyPI) open-webui < 0.9.0 0.9.0

References

CVSS score 7.1/10
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H
Weakness (CWE)
CWE-862
Platform
Python (PyPI)
Package
open-webui
Disclosed
14.05.2026
Updated
11.10.2026 14:18

Sources and licenses

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - PYSEC-2026-2714 - PyPA Advisory Database; CC BY 4.0

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-8jjp-r2w2-4v22 - CC BY 4.0

Vulnerability history: open-webui

All published vulnerabilities of this package (Python (PyPI)), newest first. Shows whether this is a one-off slip or a package that needs watching.

All (161) in the archive
Total entries
161
First → latest
08.2024 09.2026
Without a fix
11
Exploited in attacks
0

Severity breakdown

  • Critical 1
  • High 77
  • Medium 75
  • Low 8

Disclosures per year

  1. 2024: 3
  2. 2025: 21
  3. 2026: 137
Severity:
  1. High · 7.7 CVE-2026-59221 >= 0.9.6, < 0.10.0 0.10.0
  2. High · 7.3 CVE-2026-59214 < 0.10.0 0.10.0
  3. High · 8.7 CVE-2026-54011 < 0.9.6 0.9.6
  4. Open WebUI: Low-privilege authenticated users can enumerate and stop global background tasks, causing system-wide chat disruption this entry
    High · 7.1 CVE-2026-45399 < 0.9.0 0.9.0
  5. High · 7.1 CVE-2026-45349 < 0.9.0 0.9.0
  6. High · 7.7 CVE-2026-45303 < 0.6.5 0.6.5
  7. High · 7.1 CVE-2026-44569 < 0.6.19 0.6.19
  8. High · 8.1 CVE-2026-44565 < 0.6.10 0.6.10
  9. High · 7.3 CVE-2026-44566 < 0.1.124 0.1.124
  10. High · 7.3 CVE-2026-44567 < 0.1.124 0.1.124
  11. High · 7.3 CVE-2026-44549 < 0.8.0 0.8.0
  12. Critical · 9.1 CVE-2026-44551 < 0.9.0 0.9.0
  13. High · 7.3 CVE-2026-44721 < 0.9.0 0.9.0
Show more (18) Showing 60 of 78

Know which vulnerabilities affect your application

With the DockRay integration and software inventory enabled, DockRay checks reported component versions against known vulnerabilities and notifies you about confirmed matches. Coverage depends on the supported technology and available advisory data.

Connect your application
DockRay newsletter

Application security in your inbox

Important vulnerabilities, actionable guidance and practical advice for your applications. Choose your technologies and follow what matters to your project.

  • A daily digest of new vulnerabilities, critical ones included.
  • Notifications about important updates.
  • Practical advice on application security and monitoring.

Leave empty to receive updates for every technology.

Free to subscribe. Unsubscribe with one click in any email.