Low

parse-server: MFA SMS one-time password accepted twice under concurrent login

  • Disclosed: 05.05.2026
  • Updated: 11.10.2026 10:22

Impact

A race condition in the MFA SMS one-time password (OTP) login path allows two concurrent /login requests carrying the same OTP to both succeed and both receive valid session tokens, breaking the single-use property of the OTP. The vulnerability requires the attacker to already possess the victim's password and intercept the active SMS OTP (e.g. via SIM swap, network mirror, or phishing relay) and to race the legitimate login request, so the practical attack surface is narrow.

This advisory is the same class of incomplete fix as GHSA-2299-ghjr-6vjp (TOTP recovery codes) and GHSA-w73w-g5xw-rwhf (MFA recovery in authData-only login). Those previous fixes added optimistic locking only for array-typed authData fields; SMS MFA stores the OTP as a string, so the guard skipped it.

Patches

The optimistic lock has been generalized to cover primitive (string, number, boolean) and array authData fields. The lock is implemented as a shared helper applyAuthDataOptimisticLock that adds equality predicates on the original values of changed fields to the update WHERE clause. Concurrent writers racing the same single-use token now miss the WHERE condition and surface as Invalid auth data.

Workarounds

  • Disable SMS MFA and use TOTP instead (TOTP tokens are time-window validated, not stored single-use).
  • Place a rate limiter on the /login endpoint to reduce concurrent-request burst capacity.

Resources

Affected software

Click a technology to see all vulnerabilities affecting it.

PlatformPackageVulnerable versionsFixed in
npm package parse-server >= 9.0.0, < 9.9.0-alpha.2, < 8.6.76 9.9.0-alpha.2, 8.6.76

References

CVSS score -
CVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Weakness (CWE)
CWE-362
Platform
npm
Package
parse-server
Disclosed
05.05.2026
Updated
11.10.2026 10:22

Sources and licenses

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-jpq4-7fmq-q5fj - CC BY 4.0

Vulnerability history: parse-server

All published vulnerabilities of this package (npm package), newest first. Shows whether this is a one-off slip or a package that needs watching.

All (116) in the archive
Total entries
116
First → latest
06.2019 06.2026
Without a fix
0
Exploited in attacks
0

Severity breakdown

  • Critical 17
  • High 49
  • Medium 40
  • Low 10

Disclosures per year

  1. 2019: 2
  2. 2020: 4
  3. 2021: 4
  4. 2022: 12
  5. 2023: 5
  6. 2024: 4
  7. 2025: 6
  8. 2026: 79
Severity:
  1. High CVE-2026-57480 >= 9.0.0, < 9.9.1-alpha.12, < 8.6.82 9.9.1-alpha.12, 8.6.82
  2. High CVE-2026-47138 >= 9.0.0, < 9.9.1-alpha.1, < 8.6.77 9.9.1-alpha.1, 8.6.77
  3. parse-server: MFA SMS one-time password accepted twice under concurrent login this entry
    Low CVE-2026-43930 >= 9.0.0, < 9.9.0-alpha.2, < 8.6.76 9.9.0-alpha.2, 8.6.76
  4. High CVE-2026-34784 >= 9.0.0, < 9.7.1-alpha.1, < 8.6.71 9.7.1-alpha.1, 8.6.71
  5. High CVE-2026-34573 >= 9.0.0, < 9.7.0-alpha.12, < 8.6.68 9.7.0-alpha.12, 8.6.68
  6. Critical CVE-2026-34532 >= 9.0.0, < 9.7.0-alpha.11, < 8.6.67 9.7.0-alpha.11, 8.6.67
  7. High CVE-2026-34363 >= 9.0.0, < 9.7.0-alpha.9, < 8.6.65 9.7.0-alpha.9, 8.6.65
  8. High CVE-2026-34215 >= 9.0.0, < 9.7.0-alpha.7, < 8.6.63 9.7.0-alpha.7, 8.6.63
  9. High CVE-2026-33627 >= 9.0.0, < 9.6.0-alpha.55, < 8.6.61 9.6.0-alpha.55, 8.6.61
  10. High CVE-2026-33539 >= 9.0.0, < 9.6.0-alpha.53, < 8.6.59 9.6.0-alpha.53, 8.6.59
  11. High CVE-2026-33538 >= 9.0.0, < 9.6.0-alpha.52, < 8.6.58 9.6.0-alpha.52, 8.6.58
  12. High · 7.5 CVE-2026-33508 >= 9.0.0, < 9.6.0-alpha.45, < 8.6.56 9.6.0-alpha.45, 8.6.56
  13. High · 7.5 CVE-2026-33498 >= 9.0.0, < 9.6.0-alpha.44, < 8.6.55 9.6.0-alpha.44, 8.6.55
  14. High · 6.5 CVE-2026-33421 >= 9.0.0, < 9.6.0-alpha.42, < 8.6.53 9.6.0-alpha.42, 8.6.53
  15. High · 9.1 CVE-2026-33409 >= 9.0.0, < 9.6.0-alpha.41, < 8.6.52 9.6.0-alpha.41, 8.6.52
  16. High CVE-2026-33163 >= 9.0.0, < 9.6.0-alpha.35, < 8.6.50 9.6.0-alpha.35, 8.6.50
  17. High CVE-2026-32886 >= 9.0.0, < 9.6.0-alpha.24, < 8.6.47 9.6.0-alpha.24, 8.6.47
  18. High CVE-2026-32944 >= 9.0.0, < 9.6.0-alpha.21, < 8.6.45 9.6.0-alpha.21, 8.6.45
  19. High CVE-2026-32728 >= 9.0.0, < 9.6.0-alpha.15, < 8.6.41 9.6.0-alpha.15, 8.6.41
  20. Critical CVE-2026-32248 >= 9.0.0, < 9.6.0-alpha.12, < 8.6.38 9.6.0-alpha.12, 8.6.38
  21. Critical CVE-2026-32242 >= 9.0.0, < 9.6.0-alpha.11, < 8.6.37 9.6.0-alpha.11, 8.6.37
  22. High CVE-2026-31875 >= 9.0.0-alpha.1, < 9.6.0-alpha.7, < 8.6.33 9.6.0-alpha.7, 8.6.33
  23. High CVE-2026-31872 >= 9.0.0-alpha.1, < 9.6.0-alpha.6, < 8.6.32 9.6.0-alpha.6, 8.6.32
  24. Critical CVE-2026-31871 >= 9.0.0-alpha.1, < 9.6.0-alpha.5, < 8.6.31 9.6.0-alpha.5, 8.6.31
  25. Critical CVE-2026-31856 >= 9.0.0-alpha.1, < 9.6.0-alpha.3, < 8.6.29 9.6.0-alpha.3, 8.6.29
  26. High CVE-2026-31800 >= 9.0.0-alpha.1, < 9.5.2-alpha.12, < 8.6.25 9.5.2-alpha.12, 8.6.25
  27. High CVE-2026-30967 >= 9.0.0-alpha.1, < 9.5.2-alpha.9, < 8.6.22 9.5.2-alpha.9, 8.6.22
  28. Critical · 10.0 CVE-2026-30966 >= 9.0.0-alpha.1, < 9.5.2-alpha.7, < 8.6.20 9.5.2-alpha.7, 8.6.20
  29. Critical CVE-2026-30965 >= 9.0.0-alpha.1, < 9.5.2-alpha.8, < 8.6.21 9.5.2-alpha.8, 8.6.21
  30. High CVE-2026-30962 >= 9.0.0, < 9.5.2-alpha.6, < 8.6.19 9.5.2-alpha.6, 8.6.19
  31. High CVE-2026-30949 >= 9.0.0, < 9.5.2-alpha.5, < 8.6.18 9.5.2-alpha.5, 8.6.18
  32. High CVE-2026-30948 >= 9.0.0, < 9.5.2-alpha.4, < 8.6.17 9.5.2-alpha.4, 8.6.17
  33. High CVE-2026-30947 >= 9.0.0, < 9.5.2-alpha.3, < 8.6.16 9.5.2-alpha.3, 8.6.16
  34. High CVE-2026-30946 < 8.6.15, >= 9.0.0, < 9.5.2-alpha.2 8.6.15, 9.5.2-alpha.2
  35. High CVE-2026-30941 >= 9.0.0, < 9.5.2-alpha.1, < 8.6.14 9.5.2-alpha.1, 8.6.14
  36. Critical CVE-2026-31840 >= 9.0.0, < 9.6.0-alpha.2, < 8.6.28 9.6.0-alpha.2, 8.6.28
  37. High CVE-2026-30939 < 8.6.13, >= 9.0.0-alpha.1, < 9.5.1-alpha.2 8.6.13, 9.5.1-alpha.2
  38. High CVE-2026-30925 >= 9.0.0-alpha.1, < 9.5.0-alpha.14, < 8.6.11 9.5.0-alpha.14, 8.6.11
  39. Critical CVE-2026-30863 >= 9.0.0-alpha.1, < 9.5.0-alpha.11, < 8.6.10 9.5.0-alpha.11, 8.6.10
  40. High CVE-2026-30229 < 8.6.6, >= 9.0.0, < 9.5.0-alpha.4 8.6.6, 9.5.0-alpha.4
  41. High CVE-2026-29182 >= 9.0.0, < 9.4.1-alpha.3, < 8.6.4 9.4.1-alpha.3, 8.6.4
  42. Critical CVE-2026-27804 >= 9.0.0, < 9.3.1-alpha.4, < 8.6.3 9.3.1-alpha.4, 8.6.3
  43. High CVE-2025-68150 >= 9.0.0, < 9.1.1-alpha.1, < 8.6.2 9.1.1-alpha.1, 8.6.2
  44. High · 7.5 CVE-2025-64430 >= 4.2.0, < 7.5.4, >= 8.0.0, < 8.4.0-alpha.2 7.5.4, 8.4.0-alpha.2
  45. High · 8.1 CVE-2024-47183 < 6.5.9, >= 7.0.0, < 7.3.0 6.5.9, 7.3.0
  46. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2024-39309 < 6.5.7, >= 7.0.0, < 7.1.0 6.5.7, 7.1.0
  47. Critical · 9.0 CVE-2024-29027 < 6.5.5, >= 7.0.0-alpha.1, < 7.0.0-alpha.29 6.5.5, 7.0.0-alpha.29
  48. Critical · 10.0 CVE-2024-27298 < 6.5.0, >= 7.0.0-alpha.1, < 7.0.0-alpha.20 6.5.0, 7.0.0-alpha.20
  49. High · 7.5 CVE-2023-46119 >= 1.0.0, < 5.5.6, >= 6.0.0, < 6.3.1 5.5.6, 6.3.1
  50. High · 7.5 CVE-2023-41058 >= 1.0.0, < 5.5.5, >= 6.0.0, < 6.2.2 5.5.5, 6.2.2
  51. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2023-36475 < 5.5.2, >= 6.0.0, < 6.2.1 5.5.2, 6.2.1
  52. High · 8.7 CVE-2023-22474 < 5.4.1 5.4.1
  53. High · 7.2 CVE-2022-41879 < 4.10.20, >= 5.0.0, < 5.3.3 4.10.20, 5.3.3
  54. High · 7.2 CVE-2022-41878 < 4.10.19, >= 5.0.0, < 5.3.2 4.10.19, 5.3.2
  55. Critical · 9.8 CVE-2022-39396 < 4.10.18, >= 5.0.0, < 5.3.1 4.10.18, 5.3.1
  56. High · 7.5 CVE-2022-39313 < 4.10.17, >= 5.0.0, < 5.2.8 4.10.17, 5.2.8
  57. High · 8.6 CVE-2022-36079 < 4.10.14, >= 5.0.0, < 5.2.5 4.10.14, 5.2.5
  58. High · 8.2 CVE-2022-31112 < 4.10.13, >= 5.0.0, < 5.2.4 4.10.13, 5.2.4
  59. High · 7.5 CVE-2022-31089 < 4.10.12, >= 5.0.0, < 5.2.3 4.10.12, 5.2.3
  60. High · 8.6 CVE-2022-31083 < 4.10.11, >= 5.0.0, < 5.2.2 4.10.11, 5.2.2
  61. High · 7.5 CVE-2022-24901 < 4.10.10, >= 5.0.0, < 5.2.1 4.10.10, 5.2.1
  62. Critical · 10.0 CVE-2022-24760 < 4.10.7 4.10.7
  63. High · 7.5 CVE-2021-41109 < 4.10.4 4.10.4
  64. Critical CVE-2021-47986 >= 4.0.0, < 4.5.2, >= 4.6.0, < 4.10.0 4.5.2, 4.10.0
  65. High · 7.5 CVE-2021-39187 < 4.10.3 4.10.3
  66. High · 7.7 CVE-2020-5251 < 4.1.0 4.1.0
  67. High · 7.5 CVE-2019-1020012 < 3.4.1 3.4.1

Know which vulnerabilities affect your application

With the DockRay integration and software inventory enabled, DockRay checks reported component versions against known vulnerabilities and notifies you about confirmed matches. Coverage depends on the supported technology and available advisory data.

Connect your application
DockRay newsletter

Application security in your inbox

Important vulnerabilities, actionable guidance and practical advice for your applications. Choose your technologies and follow what matters to your project.

  • A daily digest of new vulnerabilities, critical ones included.
  • Notifications about important updates.
  • Practical advice on application security and monitoring.

Leave empty to receive updates for every technology.

Free to subscribe. Unsubscribe with one click in any email.