Wysoka

PraisonAI: [Path Traversal] agent tools escape the configured workspace via symlinks

  • Ujawniono: 25.08.2026
  • Aktualizacja: 11.10.2026 15:18

Summary

PraisonAI's praisonai.code tool wrappers (exported as CODE_TOOLS for agents) expose a workspace setting that the module itself treats as a path-traversal security boundary — read_file, write_file, apply_diff, and search_replace explicitly call is_path_within_directory() and return "… is outside the workspace" on violations. That boundary is enforced unsoundly and inconsistently:

  1. The containment helper uses os.path.abspath(), not realpath()/Path.resolve(). A symlink located inside the workspace whose target is outside has an abspath() that is still inside the workspace, so it passes the check while open() follows the link. This bypasses read, write, apply_diff, and search_replace (CWE-59).
  2. list_files() resolves path against the workspace but never calls the containment helper at all — ../ and absolute paths escape directly (CWE-22).
  3. execute_command() takes a workspace argument documented "for security validation" but performs no cwd containment check; code_execute_command() resolves a relative cwd against the workspace and also never validates it (and never even passes workspace to the low-level helper). A relative cwd="../outside" runs commands from outside the workspace (CWE-22). An attacker who can influence an agent that has these tools attached (untrusted prompt, indirect prompt injection, or a server-exposed agent) can read, overwrite, list, and execute from outside the configured workspace, bounded only by the process user's filesystem permissions.

Technical Detail

1. Unsound containment helper (symlink bypass — CWE-59)

python
# src/praisonai/praisonai/code/utils/file_utils.py — is_path_within_directory()
abs_file = os.path.abspath(file_path)     # does NOT resolve symlinks
abs_dir  = os.path.abspath(directory)
if not abs_dir.endswith(os.sep): abs_dir += os.sep
return abs_file.startswith(abs_dir) or abs_file == abs_dir.rstrip(os.sep)

read_file/write_file/apply_diff/search_replace call this with the configured workspace (e.g. read_file.py: # Security check - ensure path is within workspace). Because abspath() does not canonicalize symlinks, a link at WORKSPACE/link_to_secret.txt → /outside/secret.txt has abspath WORKSPACE/link_to_secret.txt (inside) and passes, while open() follows it to the real outside target.

2. list_files() has no containment check (CWE-22)

python
# src/praisonai/praisonai/code/tools/list_files.py
if workspace and not os.path.isabs(path):
    abs_path = os.path.abspath(os.path.join(workspace, path))   # ../ collapses out of workspace
else:
    abs_path = os.path.abspath(path)                            # absolute path used as-is
# ... os.path.isdir(abs_path) then listed. is_path_within_directory() is NEVER called.

3. execute_command() never validates cwd (CWE-22)

python
# src/praisonai/praisonai/code/tools/execute_command.py — workspace param doc: "for security validation"
if cwd:
    if workspace and not os.path.isabs(cwd):
        work_dir = os.path.abspath(os.path.join(workspace, cwd))  # ../ escapes; no containment check
    else:
        work_dir = os.path.abspath(cwd)
# subprocess.run(args, cwd=work_dir, ...)   # no is_path_within_directory() anywhere
python
# src/praisonai/praisonai/code/agent_tools.py — code_execute_command()
if work_dir and _workspace_root and not os.path.isabs(work_dir):
    work_dir = os.path.join(_workspace_root, work_dir)   # joins, never validates
result = _execute_command(command=command, cwd=work_dir, timeout=120)  # workspace not even passed

Note: execute_command rejects shell=True and runs shlex.split(command) via subprocess.run (no shell), so shell metacharacters (&&, >, pipes) do not work — but any binary still runs with attacker-chosen argv from the escaped cwd, which is sufficient to read/write outside the workspace.

The workspace is an intended boundary (pre-empts "by design")

The module asserts this control itself: read_file.py "Security check - ensure path is within workspace"; write_file.py "default workspace is cwd so relative paths cannot escape"; is_path_within_directory docstring "(prevents path traversal)"; execute_command workspace param "for security validation". The bug is that the asserted control is unsound (abspath vs realpath) and not applied to list_files/execute_command cwd.

Proof of Concept

Self-contained, local temp fixtures only; no network, no untrusted commands. Real praisonai.code agent tools were called.

workspace = /tmp/.../workspace      outside = /tmp/.../outside
[1] baseline plain ../ read           -> BLOCKED: "Path '../outside/secret.txt' is outside the workspace"
[2] symlink read  (in-WS link)        -> SUCCESS: returned "SECRET_OUTSIDE_WORKSPACE"
[3] symlink write (in-WS link)        -> SUCCESS: outside file now contains "OVERWRITTEN_VIA_SYMLINK"
[4] code_list_files("../outside")     -> SUCCESS: "Contents of ../outside:  📄 secret.txt"
[5] code_execute_command(cwd="../outside","pwd") -> SUCCESS: stdout "/tmp/.../outside"
[6] code_execute_command(cwd="../outside", python3 -c open('planted.txt','w')...)
                                      -> SUCCESS: new file created OUTSIDE workspace, "PWNED_OUTSIDE_WORKSPACE"

Steps 2–6 each cross the configured workspace boundary; step 1 shows the plain-../ guard that the symlink and unscoped vectors bypass.

Impact

  • Confidentiality: read files outside the workspace (in-workspace symlink; or list/enumerate outside dirs via list_files).
  • Integrity: overwrite outside files via symlink; create/modify files outside the workspace via execute_command running in an escaped cwd.
  • Execution boundary: run arbitrary available binaries (argv-controlled) from a directory outside the workspace. Bounded by the process user's permissions. In a code-agent or server-exposed agent processing untrusted input, this exposes secrets / project-adjacent / host files and breaks the project-boundary integrity guarantee the workspace setting advertises.

Suggested Fix

  • Replace is_path_within_directory() with a realpath() / Path.resolve()-based containment check, and compare with os.path.commonpath() rather than startswith.
  • Apply that check consistently to every file path, directory path, backup path, diff/search-replace target, and command working directory, after full canonicalization (resolve the symlink's real target, not the link path).
  • list_files(): reject absolute paths and ../ escapes when workspace is set.
  • execute_command(): validate cwd containment when workspace is set; code_execute_command() should pass _workspace_root to the low-level helper or validate itself.
  • Regression tests: symlink read/write/diff/search-replace to outside targets; list_files("../outside", workspace=…); execute_command(cwd="../outside", workspace=…); absolute outside paths with a workspace set.

Czego dotyczy

Kliknij technologię, aby zobaczyć wszystkie dotyczące jej podatności.

PlatformaPaczkaPodatne wersjePoprawka w wersji
Python (PyPI) praisonai < 4.6.58 4.6.58

Odnośniki

Ocena CVSS 7.1/10
Wektor CVSS
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Słabość (CWE)
CWE-22
Platforma
Python (PyPI)
Paczka
praisonai
Ujawniono
25.08.2026
Aktualizacja
11.10.2026 15:18

Źródła i licencje

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - PYSEC-2026-3888 - PyPA Advisory Database; CC BY 4.0

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-ch89-h4r2-c8f8 - CC BY 4.0

Historia podatności: praisonai

Wszystkie opisane podatności tej paczki (Python (PyPI)), od najnowszej. Widać, czy to jednorazowa wpadka, czy paczka, której trzeba pilnować.

Wszystkie (104) w archiwum
Wszystkich wpisów
104
Pierwsza → ostatnia
04.2026 10.2026
Bez poprawki
0
Wykorzystywana w atakach
0

Rozkład istotności

  • Krytyczna 27
  • Wysoka 60
  • Średnia 17

Ujawnienia w latach

  1. 2026: 104
Istotność:
  1. Wysoka · 7.5 CVE-2026-61439 < 4.6.78 4.6.78
  2. PraisonAI: [Path Traversal] agent tools escape the configured workspace via symlinks ten wpis
    Wysoka · 7.1 CVE-2026-55540 < 4.6.58 4.6.58
Pokaż więcej (20) Widać 20 z 87

Dowiedz się, które podatności dotyczą Twojej aplikacji

Po podłączeniu integracji DockRay i włączeniu raportowania oprogramowania DockRay porównuje zgłoszone wersje komponentów ze znanymi podatnościami i powiadamia o potwierdzonych dopasowaniach. Zakres zależy od obsługiwanej technologii i dostępnych biuletynów.

Podłącz swoją aplikację
Newsletter DockRay

Bezpieczeństwo aplikacji w Twojej skrzynce

Najważniejsze podatności, konkretne zalecenia i praktyczne wskazówki dla Twoich aplikacji. Wybierz technologie i śledź to, co ma znaczenie dla Twojego projektu.

  • Codzienne zestawienie nowych podatności, także krytycznych.
  • Powiadomienia o ważnych aktualizacjach.
  • Praktyczne porady o bezpieczeństwie i monitoringu aplikacji.

Pozostaw puste, aby otrzymywać informacje o wszystkich technologiach.

Zapis jest bezpłatny. Wypiszesz się jednym kliknięciem w wiadomości.