Średnia

psd-tools: Compression module has unguarded zlib decompression, missing dimension validation, and hardening gaps

  • Ujawniono: 26.02.2026
  • Aktualizacja: 11.10.2026 14:17

Summary

A security review of the psd_tools.compression module (conducted against the fix/invalid-rle-compression branch, commits 7490ffa–2a006f5) identified the following pre-existing issues. The two findings introduced and fixed by those commits (Cython buffer overflow, IndexError on lone repeat header) are excluded from this report.


Findings

1. Unguarded zlib.decompress — ZIP bomb / memory exhaustion (Medium)

Location: src/psd_tools/compression/__init__.py, lines 159 and 162

python
result = zlib.decompress(data)          # Compression.ZIP
decompressed = zlib.decompress(data)    # Compression.ZIP_WITH_PREDICTION

zlib.decompress is called without a max_length cap. A crafted PSD file containing a ZIP-compressed channel whose compressed payload expands to gigabytes would exhaust process memory before any limit is enforced. The RLE path is not vulnerable to this because the decoder pre-allocates exactly row_size × height bytes; the ZIP path has no equivalent ceiling.

Impact: Denial-of-service / OOM crash when processing untrusted PSD files.

Suggested mitigation: Pass a reasonable max_length to zlib.decompress, derived from the expected width * height * depth // 8 byte count already computed in decompress().


2. No upper-bound validation on image dimensions before allocation (Low)

Location: src/psd_tools/compression/__init__.py, lines 138 and 193

python
length = width * height * max(1, depth // 8)   # decompress()
row_size = max(width * depth // 8, 1)           # decode_rle()

Neither width, height, nor depth are range-checked before these values drive memory allocation. The PSD format (version 2 / PSB) permits dimensions up to 300,000 × 300,000 pixels; a 4-channel 32-bit image at that size would require ~144 TB to hold. While the OS/Python allocator will reject such a request, there is no early, explicit guard that produces a clean, user-facing error.

Impact: Uncontrolled allocation attempt from a malformed or adversarially crafted PSB file; hard crash rather than a recoverable error.

Suggested mitigation: Validate width, height, and depth against known PSD/PSB limits before entering decompression, and raise a descriptive ValueError early.


3. assert used as a runtime integrity check (Low)

Location: src/psd_tools/compression/__init__.py, line 170

python
assert len(result) == length, "len=%d, expected=%d" % (len(result), length)

This assertion can be silently disabled by running the interpreter with -O (or -OO), which strips all assert statements. If the assertion ever becomes relevant (e.g., after future refactoring), disabling it would allow a length mismatch to propagate silently into downstream image compositing.

Impact: Loss of an integrity guard in optimised deployments.

Suggested mitigation: Replace with an explicit if + raise ValueError(...).


4. cdef int indices vs. Py_ssize_t size type mismatch in Cython decoder (Low)

Location: src/psd_tools/compression/_rle.pyx, lines 18–20

cython
cdef int i = 0
cdef int j = 0
cdef int length = data.shape[0]

All loop indices are C signed int (32-bit). The size parameter is Py_ssize_t (64-bit on modern platforms). The comparison j < size promotes j to Py_ssize_t, but if j wraps due to a row size exceeding INT_MAX (~2.1 GB), the resulting comparison is undefined behaviour in C. In practice, row sizes are bounded by PSD/PSB dimension limits and are unreachable at this scale; however, the mismatch is a latent defect if the function is ever called directly with large synthetic inputs.

Impact: Theoretical infinite loop or UB at >2 GB row sizes; not reachable from standard PSD/PSB parsing.

Suggested mitigation: Change cdef int i, j, length to cdef Py_ssize_t.


5. Silent data degradation not surfaced to callers (Informational)

Location: src/psd_tools/compression/__init__.py, lines 144–157

The tolerant RLE decoder (introduced in 2a006f5) replaces malformed channel data with zero-padded (black) pixels and emits a logger.warning. This is the correct trade-off over crashing, but the warning is only observable if the caller has configured a log handler. The public PSDImage API does not surface channel-level decode failures to the user in any other way.

Impact: A user parsing a silently corrupt file gets a visually wrong image with no programmatic signal to check.

Suggested mitigation: Consider exposing a per-channel decode-error flag or raising a distinct warning category that users can filter or escalate via the warnings module.


6. encode() zero-length return type inconsistency in Cython (Informational)

Location: src/psd_tools/compression/_rle.pyx, lines 66–67

cython
if length == 0:
    return data   # returns a memoryview, not an explicit std::string

All other return paths return an explicit cdef string result. This path returns data (a const unsigned char[:] memoryview) and relies on Cython's implicit coercion to bytes. It is functionally equivalent today but is semantically inconsistent and fragile if Cython's coercion rules change in a future version.

Impact: Potential silent breakage in future Cython versions; not a current security issue.

Suggested mitigation: Replace return data with return result (the already-declared empty string).


Environment

  • Branch: fix/invalid-rle-compression
  • Reviewed commits: 7490ffa, 2a006f5
  • Python: 3.x (Cython extension compiled for CPython)

Czego dotyczy

Kliknij technologię, aby zobaczyć wszystkie dotyczące jej podatności.

PlatformaPaczkaPodatne wersjePoprawka w wersji
Python (PyPI) psd-tools < 1.12.2 1.12.2

Odnośniki

Ocena CVSS -
Wektor CVSS
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U
Słabość (CWE)
CWE-190, CWE-409, CWE-617, CWE-704, CWE-755, CWE-789
Platforma
Python (PyPI)
Paczka
psd-tools
Ujawniono
26.02.2026
Aktualizacja
11.10.2026 14:17

Źródła i licencje

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - PYSEC-2026-2262 - PyPA Advisory Database; CC BY 4.0

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-24p2-j2jr-386w - CC BY 4.0

Historia podatności: psd-tools

Wszystkie opisane podatności tej paczki (Python (PyPI)), od najnowszej. Widać, czy to jednorazowa wpadka, czy paczka, której trzeba pilnować.

Wszystkich wpisów
4
Pierwsza → ostatnia
03.2020 09.2026
Bez poprawki
0
Wykorzystywana w atakach
0

Rozkład istotności

  • Krytyczna 1
  • Wysoka 1
  • Średnia 2

Ujawnienia w latach

  1. 2020: 1
  2. 2021: 0
  3. 2022: 0
  4. 2023: 0
  5. 2024: 0
  6. 2025: 0
  7. 2026: 3
  1. psd-tools: Compression module has unguarded zlib decompression, missing dimension validation, and hardening gaps ten wpis
    Średnia CVE-2026-27809 < 1.12.2 1.12.2
  2. Krytyczna · 9.8 CVE-2020-10571 >= 1.8.37, < 1.9.4 1.9.4

Dowiedz się, które podatności dotyczą Twojej aplikacji

Po podłączeniu integracji DockRay i włączeniu raportowania oprogramowania DockRay porównuje zgłoszone wersje komponentów ze znanymi podatnościami i powiadamia o potwierdzonych dopasowaniach. Zakres zależy od obsługiwanej technologii i dostępnych biuletynów.

Podłącz swoją aplikację
Newsletter DockRay

Bezpieczeństwo aplikacji w Twojej skrzynce

Najważniejsze podatności, konkretne zalecenia i praktyczne wskazówki dla Twoich aplikacji. Wybierz technologie i śledź to, co ma znaczenie dla Twojego projektu.

  • Codzienne zestawienie nowych podatności, także krytycznych.
  • Powiadomienia o ważnych aktualizacjach.
  • Praktyczne porady o bezpieczeństwie i monitoringu aplikacji.

Pozostaw puste, aby otrzymywać informacje o wszystkich technologiach.

Zapis jest bezpłatny. Wypiszesz się jednym kliknięciem w wiadomości.