Crítica

NLTK: JVM argument injection bypass via per-call options in the NLTK Stanford wrappers (incomplete fix of CVE-2026-12841)

  • Publicada: 25.08.2026
  • Actualizado: 11.10.2026 15:18

Vulnerability

The fix for CVE-2026-12841 (CWE-88, JVM argument injection) added _validate_java_options() to block dangerous JVM flags such as -agentlib, -agentpath, -javaagent, -Xrunjdwp, and @argfile references. However, the validation is only applied when setting global options via config_java(). The java() function's per-call options parameter -- added by PR #3683 (CVE-2026-12615 fix) -- passes options directly to subprocess.Popen without calling _validate_java_options().

All four Stanford Java wrapper classes accept user-supplied java_options and route them through the unvalidated per-call path, bypassing the CVE-2026-12841 fix entirely.

Root Cause

In nltk/internals.py, the java() function (line 128) accepts an options keyword argument. When options is not None, it is converted to a list and prepended to the JVM command (lines 211-217) without any validation:

python
# nltk/internals.py, lines 211-217 (HEAD)
if options is None:
    java_options = _java_options       # validated by config_java()
else:
    if isinstance(options, str):
        options = options.split()
    java_options = list(options)       # NO validation
cmd = [_java_bin] + java_options + cmd

Compare with config_java() (line 92) which does validate:

python
# nltk/internals.py, lines 122-123
_validate_java_options(options)
_java_options[:] = options

The four affected wrapper classes store user-supplied java_options without validation and pass them through the unvalidated per-call path:

  1. GenericStanfordParser (nltk/parse/stanford.py): constructor parameter at line 39, stored at line 78, passed at lines 247 and 256
  2. StanfordTagger (nltk/tag/stanford.py): constructor parameter at line 51, stored at line 79, passed at line 118
  3. StanfordTokenizer (nltk/tokenize/stanford.py): constructor parameter at line 43, stored at line 66, passed at line 109
  4. StanfordSegmenter (nltk/tokenize/stanford_segmenter.py): constructor parameter at line 68, stored at line 117, passed at line 337

Proof of Concept

python
from nltk.internals import config_java, java, _validate_java_options

# 1. The global config_java() path correctly blocks dangerous flags:
try:
    config_java(options=["-agentpath:/tmp/evil.so"])
except ValueError as e:
    print(f"config_java blocked: {e}")   # blocked as expected

# 2. The per-call options path does NOT block them:
# (Would execute if Java were installed)
# java(["SomeClass"], classpath=".", options=["-agentpath:/tmp/evil.so"])
# This passes "-agentpath:/tmp/evil.so" directly to subprocess.Popen

# 3. Stanford wrapper classes pass through without validation:
# from nltk.parse.stanford import StanfordParser
# parser = StanfordParser(java_options="-agentpath:/tmp/evil.so")
# parser.parse(...)  # dangerous flag reaches JVM

# Verify the gap directly:
dangerous_opts = ["-agentpath:/tmp/evil.so"]
try:
    _validate_java_options(dangerous_opts)
    print("Would have been caught")
except ValueError:
    print("Correctly rejected by _validate_java_options()")

# But java() itself never calls _validate_java_options():
import inspect
source = inspect.getsource(java)
assert "_validate_java_options" not in source, "java() does not validate options"
print("Confirmed: java() does not call _validate_java_options()")

Impact

An attacker who controls the java_options parameter to any NLTK Stanford wrapper class can inject arbitrary JVM flags, including:

  • -agentpath:/path/to/malicious.so -- loads a native agent, achieving arbitrary code execution
  • -javaagent:/path/to/malicious.jar -- loads a Java agent for bytecode manipulation
  • -agentlib:jdwp=transport=dt_socket,server=y,address=*:5005 -- enables remote debugging, allowing remote code execution
  • @/path/to/argfile -- expands an argument file, which can smuggle any of the above

This is exploitable in scenarios where NLTK is deployed as a service and java_options is derived from user input, configuration files, or environment variables. The PR #3647 commit message explicitly states the fix was intended to cover "StanfordSegmenter, and GenericStanfordParser" but the implementation only validates in config_java().

Suggested Fix

Add _validate_java_options() to the java() function's per-call options handling:

python
# nltk/internals.py, in the java() function
if options is None:
    java_options = _java_options
else:
    if isinstance(options, str):
        options = options.split()
    java_options = list(options)
    _validate_java_options(java_options)   # ADD THIS LINE
cmd = [_java_bin] + java_options + cmd

This single-line addition closes the bypass for all four Stanford wrapper classes and any future callers of java(options=...).

AI tooling

AI assistance was used for the code audit and for drafting this report. The finding were manually verified against the project's source at the location cited above before reporting it, and the severity and impact assessment are the reporters.

Software afectado

Haz clic en una tecnología para ver todas sus vulnerabilidades.

PlataformaPaqueteVersiones vulnerablesCorregida en
Python (PyPI) nltk < 3.10.3 3.10.3

Referencias

Puntuación CVSS 9.8/10
Vector CVSS
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Debilidad (CWE)
CWE-88
Plataforma
Python (PyPI)
Paquete
nltk
Publicada
25.08.2026
Actualizado
11.10.2026 15:18

Fuentes y licencias

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - PYSEC-2026-3749 - PyPA Advisory Database; CC BY 4.0

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-m4rf-3fr8-xwx3 - CC BY 4.0

Historial de vulnerabilidades: nltk

Todas las vulnerabilidades publicadas de este paquete (Python (PyPI)), de la más reciente a la más antigua. Muestra si es un fallo aislado o un paquete que hay que vigilar.

Todas (52) en el archivo
Entradas en total
52
Primera → última
08.2019 09.2026
Sin corrección
6
Explotada en ataques
0

Distribución por gravedad

  • Crítica 5
  • Alta 32
  • Media 13
  • Baja 2

Divulgaciones por año

  1. 2019: 1
  2. 2020: 0
  3. 2021: 2
  4. 2022: 1
  5. 2023: 0
  6. 2024: 1
  7. 2025: 0
  8. 2026: 47
Gravedad:
  1. Alta · 7.0 CVE-2026-81726 <= 3.10.3 sin corrección
  2. NLTK: JVM argument injection bypass via per-call options in the NLTK Stanford wrappers (incomplete fix of CVE-2026-12841) esta entrada
    Crítica · 9.8 CVE-2026-79675 < 3.10.3 3.10.3
  3. Alta CVE-2026-79674 < 3.10.3 3.10.3
  4. Alta · 8.8 CVE-2026-71513 >= 3.10.0, < 3.10.3 3.10.3
  5. Alta · 5.9 CVE-2026-62385 < 3.10.0 3.10.0
  6. Alta · 7.5 CVE-2026-33231 < 3.9.4 3.9.4
  7. Crítica · 10.0 CVE-2025-14009 < 3.9.3 3.9.3
  8. Alta · 7.5 CVE-2024-39705 < 3.9 3.9
  9. Alta · 7.5 CVE-2021-3842 < 3.6.6 3.6.6
  10. Alta · 7.5 CVE-2021-3828 < 3.6.4 3.6.4
  11. Alta · 7.5 CVE-2019-14751 < 3.4.5 3.4.5

Identifica las vulnerabilidades de tu aplicación

Con la integración de DockRay y el inventario de software activado, DockRay compara las versiones notificadas de los componentes con las vulnerabilidades conocidas y avisa de las coincidencias confirmadas. La cobertura depende de la tecnología compatible y de los avisos disponibles.

Conectar tu aplicación
Newsletter DockRay

La seguridad de tus aplicaciones en tu correo

Vulnerabilidades importantes, recomendaciones concretas y consejos prácticos para tus aplicaciones. Elige tus tecnologías y sigue lo que importa para tu proyecto.

  • Un resumen diario de nuevas vulnerabilidades, también las críticas.
  • Avisos sobre actualizaciones importantes.
  • Consejos prácticos sobre seguridad y monitorización de aplicaciones.

Déjalo vacío para recibir avisos de todas las tecnologías.

Suscripción gratuita. Date de baja con un clic en cualquier correo.