Media

jackson-databind: @JsonView bypassed for @JsonUnwrapped container properties on deserialization

  • Publicada: 21.07.2026
  • Actualizado: 19.10.2026 22:17

Summary

UnwrappedPropertyHandler.processUnwrapped() replays the buffered JSON for a @JsonUnwrapped property by iterating its properties and calling prop.deserializeAndSet() with no prop.visibleInView(ctxt.getActiveView()) guard — the exact guard processUnwrappedCreatorProperties() received in the #5971 / GHSA-rcqc-6cw3-h962 fix, and the guard BeanDeserializer.deserializeWithUnwrapped applies to directly-matched properties. As a result, a property annotated with both @JsonView(PrivilegedView.class) and @JsonUnwrapped is written from attacker JSON even when deserializing under a more-restrictive active view.

Correction to the original framing (runtime-verified): the gap is NOT a per-field inner @JsonView (the unwrapped sub-object's own BeanDeserializer gates inner fields correctly). The unchecked gate is the view of the unwrapped CONTAINER property.

Intent proof (runtime, 2.x HEAD 21dd70dd and 3.x HEAD 7a5939d6)

An @JsonView(AdminView) property that is NOT @JsonUnwrapped → null under PublicView (correctly gated). The identical property WITH @JsonUnwrapped → fully populated (bypass). The fix the creator path already received, not applied to the regular-property method.

Impact — write-side mass-assignment / privilege escalation

@JsonView is commonly used as a write-side authorization guard: a public endpoint binds the body under readerWithView(PublicView.class) and groups privileged state in a nested object whose container property is @JsonView(AdminView). When that property is @JsonUnwrapped, an untrusted caller mass-assigns it. PoC: a self-service registration where AccountFlags{role,approved,creditBalance} is @JsonView(AdminView) @JsonUnwrapped; attacker JSON {role:ADMIN,approved:true,creditBalance:1000000} under PublicView binds all three → approved admin with arbitrary balance. The failing gate is a WRITE gate, hence integrity-high (C:N/I:H/A:N); no worse than the C:L/I:L parent and arguably higher as @JsonView-as-write-guard is the exact use case #5971/#5969 defended.

Affected

  • com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind 2.x: confirmed bypass at 21dd70dd (== released 2.21.4 / 2.22.0 line; includes the #5973 backport). DEFAULT_VIEW_INCLUSION default=true.
  • tools.jackson.core:jackson-databind 3.x: confirmed bypass at HEAD 7a5939d6 (latest 3.x). DEFAULT_VIEW_INCLUSION default=false → the stock-config repro is the common shape where privileged inner fields are individually @JsonView(PublicView) and the developer relies on the container @JsonView(AdminView); the 3.x PoC mass-assigns role/approved/creditBalance under PublicView. (The other simultaneous report's PoC was reportedly fixed on 3.x; this distinct container-property path is not.)

Additive variants (runtime-confirmed both branches; all closed by the same one-line guard)

  • nested @JsonUnwrapped (unwrapped-in-unwrapped) — recursive bypass.
  • merge / readerWithView(...).withValueToUpdate(...) (PATCH/partial-update) — bypass; non-unwrapped merge control gates correctly.
  • builder-based deserializer (@JsonDeserialize(builder=...)) — BuilderBasedDeserializer routes through the same processUnwrapped.
  • Honest non-findings: read-side serialization correctly honors views (no leak); @JsonAnySetter+view and @JsonTypeInfo+@JsonUnwrapped are separate/unsupported behaviors, not this bug.

Fix

Add prop.visibleInView(ctxt.getActiveView()) (when MapperFeature.DEFAULT_VIEW_INCLUSION/active-view applies) to the processUnwrapped() property loop, mirroring processUnwrappedCreatorProperties(). One change closes the impact PoC + all three variants across BeanDeserializer and BuilderBasedDeserializer. Full runnable PoCs (2.x + 3.x) + variant harnesses available on request.

Software afectado

Haz clic en una tecnología para ver todas sus vulnerabilidades.

PlataformaPaqueteVersiones vulnerablesCorregida en
Java / Kotlin (Maven) com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind >= 2.19.0, < 2.21.5, >= 2.0.0-RC1, < 2.18.9, >= 2.22.0, < 2.22.1 2.21.5, 2.18.9, 2.22.1
Java / Kotlin (Maven) tools.jackson.core:jackson-databind >= 3.0.0, < 3.1.5, >= 3.2.0, < 3.2.1 3.1.5, 3.2.1

Referencias

Puntuación CVSS 6.5/10
Vector CVSS
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Debilidad (CWE)
CWE-863
Plataforma
Java / Kotlin (Maven)
Paquete
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind, tools.jackson.core:jackson-databind
Publicada
21.07.2026
Actualizado
19.10.2026 22:17

Fuentes y licencias

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-5gvw-p9qm-jgwh - CC BY 4.0

Historial de vulnerabilidades: com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind

Todas las vulnerabilidades publicadas de este paquete (Java / Kotlin (Maven)), de la más reciente a la más antigua. Muestra si es un fallo aislado o un paquete que hay que vigilar.

Todas (86) en el archivo
Entradas en total
86
Primera → última
10.2018 09.2026
Sin corrección
0
Explotada en ataques
0

Distribución por gravedad

  • Crítica 24
  • Alta 48
  • Media 14

Divulgaciones por año

  1. 2018: 4
  2. 2019: 19
  3. 2020: 23
  4. 2021: 18
  5. 2022: 4
  6. 2023: 1
  7. 2024: 0
  8. 2025: 0
  9. 2026: 17
Gravedad:
  1. Alta · 7.5 CVE-2026-91777 >= 2.19.0, < 2.21.7, >= 2.5.0, < 2.18.11, >= 2.22.0, < 2.22.3 2.21.7, 2.18.11, 2.22.3
  2. Alta · 7.5 CVE-2026-91776 >= 2.0.0, < 2.18.11, >= 2.19.0, < 2.21.7, >= 2.22.0, < 2.22.3 2.18.11, 2.21.7, 2.22.3
  3. Alta · 7.5 CVE-2026-68497 >= 2.14.0, < 2.18.10, >= 2.19.0, < 2.21.6, >= 2.22.0, < 2.22.2 2.18.10, 2.21.6, 2.22.2
  4. jackson-databind: @JsonView bypassed for @JsonUnwrapped container properties on deserialization esta entrada
    Media · 6.5 CVE-2026-59889 >= 2.19.0, < 2.21.5, >= 2.0.0-RC1, < 2.18.9, >= 2.22.0, < 2.22.1 2.21.5, 2.18.9, 2.22.1
  5. Alta · 8.1 CVE-2026-54513 >= 2.10.0, < 2.18.8, >= 2.19.0, < 2.21.4, >= 3.0.0, < 3.1.4 2.18.8, 2.21.4, 3.1.4
  6. Alta · 8.1 CVE-2026-54512 >= 2.10.0, < 2.18.8, >= 3.0.0, < 3.1.4, >= 2.19.0, < 2.21.4 2.18.8, 3.1.4, 2.21.4
  7. Alta · 7.5 CVE-2021-46877 >= 2.10.0, < 2.12.6, >= 2.13.0, < 2.13.1 2.12.6, 2.13.1
  8. Alta · 7.5 CVE-2022-42003 >= 2.4.0-rc1, < 2.12.7.1, >= 2.13.0, < 2.13.4.2 2.12.7.1, 2.13.4.2
  9. Alta · 7.5 CVE-2022-42004 >= 2.4.0-rc1, < 2.12.7.1, >= 2.13.0, < 2.13.4 2.12.7.1, 2.13.4
  10. Alta · 8.1 CVE-2020-10650 < 2.9.10.4 2.9.10.4
  11. Alta · 7.5 CVE-2020-36518 >= 2.13.0, < 2.13.2.1, < 2.12.6.1 2.13.2.1, 2.12.6.1
  12. Alta · 8.1 CVE-2020-36189 >= 2.7.0, < 2.9.10.8, < 2.6.7.5 2.9.10.8, 2.6.7.5
  13. Alta · 8.1 CVE-2020-36187 >= 2.0.0, < 2.9.10.8 2.9.10.8
  14. Alta · 8.1 CVE-2020-36188 >= 2.7.0, < 2.9.10.8, >= 2.0.0, < 2.6.7.5 2.9.10.8, 2.6.7.5
  15. Alta · 8.1 CVE-2020-36183 >= 2.7.00, < 2.9.10.8, >= 2.0.0, < 2.6.7.5 2.9.10.8, 2.6.7.5
  16. Alta · 8.1 CVE-2020-36184 >= 2.0.0, < 2.9.10.8 2.9.10.8
  17. Alta · 8.1 CVE-2020-36180 >= 2.7.0, < 2.9.10.8, >= 2.0.0, < 2.6.7.5 2.9.10.8, 2.6.7.5
  18. Alta · 8.1 CVE-2020-36181 >= 2.7.0, < 2.9.10.8, >= 2.0.0, < 2.6.7.5 2.9.10.8, 2.6.7.5
  19. Alta · 8.1 CVE-2020-36185 >= 2.0.0, < 2.9.10.8 2.9.10.8
  20. Alta · 8.1 CVE-2020-36179 >= 2.7.0, < 2.9.10.8, >= 2.0.0, < 2.6.7.5 2.9.10.8, 2.6.7.5
  21. Alta · 8.1 CVE-2020-36182 >= 2.7.0, < 2.9.10.8, >= 2.0.0, < 2.6.7.5 2.9.10.8, 2.6.7.5
  22. Alta · 8.1 CVE-2020-24750 >= 2.0, < 2.6.7.5, >= 2.7.0, < 2.9.10.6 2.6.7.5, 2.9.10.6
  23. Alta · 8.1 CVE-2020-35728 >= 2.0.0, < 2.9.10.8 2.9.10.8
  24. Alta · 8.1 CVE-2020-35491 >= 2.0.0, < 2.9.10.8 2.9.10.8
  25. Alta · 8.1 CVE-2020-35490 >= 2.0.0, < 2.9.10.8 2.9.10.8
  26. Alta · 8.1 CVE-2020-24616 >= 2.0.0, < 2.9.10.6 2.9.10.6
  27. Alta · 8.1 CVE-2020-36186 >= 2.0.0, < 2.9.10.8 2.9.10.8
  28. Alta · 7.5 CVE-2020-25649 >= 2.6.0, < 2.6.7.4, >= 2.7.0.0, < 2.9.10.7, >= 2.10.0.0, < 2.10.5.1 2.6.7.4, 2.9.10.7, 2.10.5.1
  29. Alta · 8.1 CVE-2021-20190 >= 2.7.0, < 2.9.10.7, < 2.6.7.5 2.9.10.7, 2.6.7.5
  30. Alta · 8.1 CVE-2018-5968 >= 2.8.0, < 2.8.11.1, >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.4, < 2.7.9.5 2.8.11.1, 2.9.4, 2.7.9.5
  31. Alta · 8.1 CVE-2020-14061 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.5 2.9.10.5
  32. Alta · 8.1 CVE-2020-14062 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.5 2.9.10.5
  33. Alta · 8.1 CVE-2020-14060 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.5 2.9.10.5
  34. Alta · 8.1 CVE-2020-14195 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.5 2.9.10.5
  35. Alta · 7.5 CVE-2018-12023 >= 2.7.0, < 2.7.9.4, >= 2.8.0, < 2.8.11.2, >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.6 2.7.9.4, 2.8.11.2, 2.9.6
  36. Crítica · 9.8 CVE-2019-17267 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10, < 2.8.11.5 2.9.10, 2.8.11.5
  37. Alta · 8.8 CVE-2020-11112 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.4 2.9.10.4
  38. Crítica · 9.8 CVE-2020-9547 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.4, >= 2.8.0, < 2.8.11.6, >= 2.0.0, < 2.7.9.7 2.9.10.4, 2.8.11.6, 2.7.9.7
  39. Alta CVE-2019-14893 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10 2.9.10
  40. Alta · 8.8 CVE-2020-10673 >= 2.7.0, < 2.9.10.4, >= 2.0.0, < 2.6.7.4 2.9.10.4, 2.6.7.4
  41. Crítica · 9.8 CVE-2020-9548 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.4, >= 2.8.0, < 2.8.11.6, >= 2.0.0, < 2.7.9.7 2.9.10.4, 2.8.11.6, 2.7.9.7
  42. Alta · 7.5 CVE-2019-14892 < 2.6.7.3, >= 2.7.0, < 2.8.11.5, >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10 2.6.7.3, 2.8.11.5, 2.9.10
  43. Alta · 8.8 CVE-2020-10968 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.4 2.9.10.4
  44. Alta · 8.8 CVE-2020-11111 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.4 2.9.10.4
  45. Alta · 8.8 CVE-2020-11113 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.4 2.9.10.4
  46. Alta · 8.1 CVE-2020-11619 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.4 2.9.10.4
  47. Alta · 8.8 CVE-2020-10969 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.4 2.9.10.4
  48. Crítica · 9.8 CVE-2020-9546 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.4 2.9.10.4
  49. Alta · 8.1 CVE-2020-11620 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.4 2.9.10.4
  50. Alta · 8.8 CVE-2020-10672 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.4 2.9.10.4
  51. Crítica · 9.8 CVE-2020-8840 >= 2.0.0, < 2.6.7.4, >= 2.7.0, < 2.7.9.7, >= 2.8.0, < 2.8.11.5, >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.3 2.6.7.4, 2.7.9.7, 2.8.11.5, 2.9.10.3
  52. Crítica · 9.8 CVE-2019-20330 >= 2.0.0, < 2.6.7.4, >= 2.7.0, < 2.7.9.7, >= 2.8.0, < 2.8.11.5, >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.2 2.6.7.4, 2.7.9.7, 2.8.11.5, 2.9.10.2
  53. Crítica · 9.8 CVE-2019-17531 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.1, >= 2.7.0, < 2.8.11.5, < 2.6.7.3 2.9.10.1, 2.8.11.5, 2.6.7.3
  54. Crítica · 9.8 CVE-2019-16943 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.1, >= 2.7.0, < 2.8.11.5, < 2.6.7.3 2.9.10.1, 2.8.11.5, 2.6.7.3
  55. Crítica · 9.8 CVE-2019-16942 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10.1, >= 2.7.0, < 2.8.11.5, >= 2.0.0, < 2.6.7.3 2.9.10.1, 2.8.11.5, 2.6.7.3
  56. Crítica · 9.8 CVE-2019-16335 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10, >= 2.7.0, < 2.8.11.5, < 2.6.7.3 2.9.10, 2.8.11.5, 2.6.7.3
  57. Crítica · 9.8 CVE-2019-14540 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.10, >= 2.7.0, < 2.8.11.5, < 2.6.7.3 2.9.10, 2.8.11.5, 2.6.7.3
  58. Alta · 7.5 CVE-2019-14439 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.9.2, >= 2.8.0, < 2.8.11.4, >= 2.7.0, < 2.7.9.6, < 2.6.7.3 2.9.9.2, 2.8.11.4, 2.7.9.6, 2.6.7.3
  59. Crítica · 9.8 CVE-2019-14379 >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.9.2, >= 2.8.0, < 2.8.11.4, < 2.7.9.6 2.9.9.2, 2.8.11.4, 2.7.9.6
  60. Crítica · 9.8 CVE-2018-11307 >= 2.0.0, < 2.7.9.4, >= 2.8.0, < 2.8.11.2, >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.6 2.7.9.4, 2.8.11.2, 2.9.6
Mostrar más (13) Mostrando 60 de 73

Identifica las vulnerabilidades de tu aplicación

Con la integración de DockRay y el inventario de software activado, DockRay compara las versiones notificadas de los componentes con las vulnerabilidades conocidas y avisa de las coincidencias confirmadas. La cobertura depende de la tecnología compatible y de los avisos disponibles.

Conectar tu aplicación
Newsletter DockRay

La seguridad de tus aplicaciones en tu correo

Vulnerabilidades importantes, recomendaciones concretas y consejos prácticos para tus aplicaciones. Elige tus tecnologías y sigue lo que importa para tu proyecto.

  • Un resumen diario de nuevas vulnerabilidades, también las críticas.
  • Avisos sobre actualizaciones importantes.
  • Consejos prácticos sobre seguridad y monitorización de aplicaciones.

Déjalo vacío para recibir avisos de todas las tecnologías.

Suscripción gratuita. Date de baja con un clic en cualquier correo.