Glances's REST/WebUI Lacks Host Validation and Remains Exposed to DNS Rebinding
Summary
Glances recently added DNS rebinding protection for the MCP endpoint, but the main REST/WebUI FastAPI application still accepts arbitrary Host headers and does not apply TrustedHostMiddleware or an equivalent host allowlist.
As a result, the REST API, WebUI, and token endpoint remain reachable through attacker-controlled domains in classic DNS rebinding scenarios. Once the victim browser has rebound the attacker domain to the Glances service, same-origin policy no longer protects the API because the browser considers the rebinding domain to be the origin.
This is a distinct issue from the previously reported default CORS weakness. CORS is not required for exploitation here because DNS rebinding causes the victim browser to treat the malicious domain as same-origin with the rebinding target.
Details
The MCP endpoint now has explicit host-based transport security:
# glances/outputs/glances_mcp.py
self.mcp_allowed_hosts = ["localhost", "127.0.0.1"]
...
return TransportSecuritySettings(
allowed_hosts=allowed_hosts,
allowed_origins=allowed_origins,
)
However, the main FastAPI application for REST/WebUI/token routes is initialized without any host validation middleware:
# glances/outputs/glances_restful_api.py
self._app = FastAPI(default_response_class=GlancesJSONResponse)
...
self._app.add_middleware(
CORSMiddleware,
allow_origins=config.get_list_value('outputs', 'cors_origins', default=["*"]),
allow_credentials=config.get_bool_value('outputs', 'cors_credentials', default=True),
allow_methods=config.get_list_value('outputs', 'cors_methods', default=["*"]),
allow_headers=config.get_list_value('outputs', 'cors_headers', default=["*"]),
)
...
if self.args.password and self._jwt_handler is not None:
self._app.include_router(self._token_router())
self._app.include_router(self._router())
There is no TrustedHostMiddleware, no comparison against the configured bind host, and no allowlist enforcement for HTTP Host values on the REST/WebUI surface.
The default bind configuration also exposes the service on all interfaces:
# glances/main.py
parser.add_argument(
'-B',
'--bind',
default='0.0.0.0',
dest='bind_address',
help='bind server to the given IPv4/IPv6 address or hostname',
)
This combination means the HTTP service will typically be reachable from the victim machine under an attacker-selected hostname once DNS is rebound to the Glances listener.
The token endpoint is also mounted on the same unprotected FastAPI app:
# glances/outputs/glances_restful_api.py
def _token_router(self) -> APIRouter:
...
router.add_api_route(f'{base_path}/token', self._api_token, methods=['POST'], dependencies=[])
Why This Is Exploitable
In a DNS rebinding attack:
- The attacker serves JavaScript from
https://attacker.example. - The victim visits that page while a Glances instance is reachable on the victim network.
- The attacker's DNS for
attacker.exampleis rebound from the attacker's server to the Glances IP address. - The victim browser now sends same-origin requests to
https://attacker.example, but those requests are delivered to Glances. - Because the Glances REST/WebUI app does not validate the
Hostheader or enforce an allowed-host policy, it serves the response. - The attacker-controlled JavaScript can read the response as same-origin content.
The MCP code already acknowledges this threat model and implements host-level defenses. The REST/WebUI code path does not.
Proof of Concept
This issue is code-validated by inspection of the current implementation:
- REST/WebUI/token are all mounted on a plain
FastAPI(...)app - no
TrustedHostMiddlewareor equivalent host validation is applied - default bind is
0.0.0.0 - MCP has separate rebinding protection, showing the project already recognizes the threat model
In a live deployment, the expected verification is:
# Victim-accessible Glances service
glances -w
# Attacker-controlled rebinding domain first resolves to attacker infra,
# then rebinds to the victim-local Glances IP.
# After rebind, attacker JS can fetch:
fetch("http://attacker.example:61208/api/4/status")
.then(r => r.text())
.then(console.log)
And if the operator exposes Glances without --password (supported and common), the attacker can read endpoints such as:
GET /api/4/status
GET /api/4/all
GET /api/4/config
GET /api/4/args
GET /api/4/serverslist
Even on password-enabled deployments, the missing host validation still leaves the REST/WebUI/token surface reachable through rebinding and increases the value of chains with other authenticated browser issues.
Impact
- Remote read of local/internal REST data: DNS rebinding can expose Glances instances that were intended to be reachable only from a local or internal network context.
- Bypass of origin-based browser isolation: Same-origin policy no longer protects the API once the browser accepts the attacker-controlled rebinding host as the origin.
- High-value chaining surface: This expands the exploitability of previously identified Glances issues involving permissive CORS, credential-bearing API responses, and state-changing authenticated endpoints.
- Token surface exposure: The JWT token route is mounted on the same host-unvalidated app and is therefore also reachable through the rebinding path.
Recommended Fix
Apply host allowlist enforcement to the main REST/WebUI FastAPI app, similar in spirit to the MCP hardening:
from starlette.middleware.trustedhost import TrustedHostMiddleware
allowed_hosts = config.get_list_value(
'outputs',
'allowed_hosts',
default=['localhost', '127.0.0.1'],
)
self._app.add_middleware(TrustedHostMiddleware, allowed_hosts=allowed_hosts)
At minimum:
- reject requests whose
Hostheader does not match an explicit allowlist - do not rely on
0.0.0.0bind semantics as an access-control boundary - document that reverse-proxy deployments must set a strict host allowlist
References
glances/outputs/glances_mcp.pyglances/outputs/glances_restful_api.pyglances/main.py
Czego dotyczy
Kliknij technologię, aby zobaczyć wszystkie dotyczące jej podatności.
| Platforma | Paczka | Podatne wersje | Poprawka w wersji |
|---|---|---|---|
| Python (PyPI) | glances | < 4.5.2 | 4.5.2 |
Odnośniki
- https://github.com/nicolargo/glances/releases/tag/v4.5.2
- https://github.com/nicolargo/glances/commit/5850c564ee10804fdf884823b9c210eb954dd1f9
- https://github.com/nicolargo/glances/security/advisories/GHSA-hhcg-r27j-fhv9
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-32632
- https://github.com/nicolargo/glances
- Wektor CVSS
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N- Słabość (CWE)
CWE-346- Platforma
- Python (PyPI)
- Paczka
glances- Ujawniono
- 16.03.2026
- Aktualizacja
- 11.10.2026 14:17
Źródła i licencje
OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - PYSEC-2026-2171 - PyPA Advisory Database; CC BY 4.0
OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-hhcg-r27j-fhv9 - CC BY 4.0
Historia podatności: glances
Wszystkie opisane podatności tej paczki (Python (PyPI)), od najnowszej. Widać, czy to jednorazowa wpadka, czy paczka, której trzeba pilnować.
- Wszystkich wpisów
- 26
- Pierwsza → ostatnia
- 07.2021 08.2026
- Bez poprawki
- 0
- Wykorzystywana w atakach
- 0
Rozkład istotności
- Krytyczna 1
- Wysoka 19
- Średnia 6
Ujawnienia w latach
- 2021: 1
- 2022: 0
- 2023: 0
- 2024: 0
- 2025: 0
- 2026: 25
-
Glances's REST/WebUI Lacks Host Validation and Remains Exposed to DNS Rebinding ten wpis
Dowiedz się, które podatności dotyczą Twojej aplikacji
Po podłączeniu integracji DockRay i włączeniu raportowania oprogramowania DockRay porównuje zgłoszone wersje komponentów ze znanymi podatnościami i powiadamia o potwierdzonych dopasowaniach. Zakres zależy od obsługiwanej technologii i dostępnych biuletynów.