vLLM vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) through MediaConnector
Summary
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the MediaConnector class within the vLLM project's multimodal feature set. The load_from_url and load_from_url_async methods obtain and process media from URLs provided by users, using different Python parsing libraries when restricting the target host. These two parsing libraries have different interpretations of backslashes, which allows the host name restriction to be bypassed. This allows an attacker to coerce the vLLM server into making arbitrary requests to internal network resources.
This vulnerability is particularly critical in containerized environments like llm-d, where a compromised vLLM pod could be used to scan the internal network, interact with other pods, and potentially cause Denial of Service or access sensitive data. For example, an attacker could make the vLLM pod send malicious requests to an internal llm-d management endpoint, leading to system instability by falsely reporting metrics like the KV cache state.
Details
The core of the vulnerability lies in the MediaConnector.load_from_url method and its asynchronous counterpart. These methods accept a URL string to fetch media content (images, audio, video).
pythondef load_from_url( self, url: str, media_io: MediaIO[_M], *, fetch_timeout: int | None = None, ) -> _M: # type: ignore[type-var] url_spec = urlparse(url) if url_spec.scheme.startswith("http"): self._assert_url_in_allowed_media_domains(url_spec) connection = self.connection data = connection.get_bytes( url, timeout=fetch_timeout, allow_redirects=envs.VLLM_MEDIA_URL_ALLOW_REDIRECTS, ) return media_io.load_bytes(data)
The URL validation uses the urlparse function from Python's urllib module, while the request is made using the request function from Python's requests module. The requests module's underlying URL parsing is implemented using the parse_url function from Python's urllib3. These two parsing functions follow different URL specifications; one is implemented according to the RFC 3986 specification, and the other is implemented according to the WHATWG Living Standard. There is a difference in how the two functions handle backslashes (\) in URLs, which allows the hostname restriction to be bypassed.
Fix
Czego dotyczy
Kliknij technologię, aby zobaczyć wszystkie dotyczące jej podatności.
| Platforma | Paczka | Podatne wersje | Poprawka w wersji |
|---|---|---|---|
| Python (PyPI) | vllm | < 0.14.1 | 0.14.1 |
Odnośniki
- https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/security/advisories/GHSA-qh4c-xf7m-gxfc
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-24779
- https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/32746
- https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/f46d576c54fb8aeec5fc70560e850bed38ef17d7
- https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm
- https://pypi.org/project/vllm
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-qh4c-xf7m-gxfc
- https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-24779.json
- https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/vllm/PYSEC-2026-2020.yaml
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2433624
- https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-24779
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:42644
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:3782
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:3462
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:3461
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:30089
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:30088
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:30087
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19712
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:10184
- Wektor CVSS
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:L- Słabość (CWE)
CWE-918- Platforma
- Python (PyPI)
- Paczka
vllm- Ujawniono
- 28.01.2026
- Aktualizacja
- 11.10.2026 15:17
Źródła i licencje
OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - PYSEC-2026-2020 - PyPA Advisory Database; CC BY 4.0
OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-qh4c-xf7m-gxfc - CC BY 4.0
Historia podatności: vllm
Wszystkie opisane podatności tej paczki (Python (PyPI)), od najnowszej. Widać, czy to jednorazowa wpadka, czy paczka, której trzeba pilnować.
- Wszystkich wpisów
- 94
- Pierwsza → ostatnia
- 09.2024 10.2026
- Bez poprawki
- 5
- Wykorzystywana w atakach
- 0
Rozkład istotności
- Krytyczna 9
- Wysoka 23
- Średnia 47
- Niska 4
- Nieoceniona 11
Ujawnienia w latach
- 2024: 2
- 2025: 30
- 2026: 62
-
vLLM vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) through MediaConnector ten wpis
Dowiedz się, które podatności dotyczą Twojej aplikacji
Po podłączeniu integracji DockRay i włączeniu raportowania oprogramowania DockRay porównuje zgłoszone wersje komponentów ze znanymi podatnościami i powiadamia o potwierdzonych dopasowaniach. Zakres zależy od obsługiwanej technologii i dostępnych biuletynów.