Anmelden
Deutsch English Español Polski
Niedrig

OpenClaw vulnerable to SSRF in src/agents/tools/web-fetch.ts

  • Veröffentlicht: 10.04.2026
  • Aktualisiert: 11.10.2026 10:22

A weakness has been identified in OpenClaw up to 2026.1.26. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file src/agents/tools/web-fetch.ts of the component assertPublicHostname Handler. Executing a manipulation can lead to server-side request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitation is known to be difficult. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. Upgrading to version 2026.1.29 can resolve this issue. This patch is called b623557a2ec7e271bda003eb3ac33fbb2e218505. Upgrading the affected component is advised.

Betroffene Software

Klicken Sie auf eine Technologie, um alle zugehörigen Schwachstellen anzuzeigen.

PlattformPaketAnfällige VersionenBehoben in
npm-Paket openclaw < 2026.1.29 2026.1.29

Verweise

CVSS-Wert 5.6/10
CVSS-Vektor
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Schwäche (CWE)
CWE-918
Plattform
npm
Paket
openclaw
Veröffentlicht
10.04.2026
Aktualisiert
11.10.2026 10:22

Quellen und Lizenzen

OSV / GitHub Advisory Database - GHSA-52vj-fvrv-7q82 - CC BY 4.0

Schwachstellenhistorie: openclaw

Alle veröffentlichten Schwachstellen dieses Pakets (npm-Paket), neueste zuerst. Zeigt, ob es ein einmaliger Ausrutscher ist oder ein Paket, das man im Auge behalten muss.

Alle (588) im Archiv
Einträge insgesamt
588
Erste → letzte
02.2026 07.2026
Ohne Fix
9
In Angriffen ausgenutzt
0

Verteilung nach Schweregrad

  • Kritisch 20
  • Hoch 215
  • Mittel 299
  • Niedrig 54

Veröffentlichungen pro Jahr

Schweregrad:
  1. OpenClaw: Native command authorization could skip owner-command enforcement
    Hoch CVE-2026-53828 < 2026.5.6 2026.5.6
  2. OpenClaw: PowerShell encoded-command aliases could miss exec allowlist checks
    Hoch · 8.8 CVE-2026-53836 < 2026.5.12 2026.5.12
  3. OpenClaw: Trusted retry endpoint checks could match hostname prefixes
    Hoch CVE-2026-53839 < 2026.5.7 2026.5.7
  4. OpenClaw: Telegram interactive callbacks could skip commands.allowFrom
    Hoch CVE-2026-53807 < 2026.5.6 2026.5.6
  5. OpenClaw: Matrix allowFrom could bind to mutable display names
    Hoch · 8.8 CVE-2026-53811 < 2026.5.7 2026.5.7
  6. OpenClaw: Paired nodes could forge exec lifecycle events without system.run provenance
    Hoch · 7.2 CVE-2026-53816 < 2026.5.18 2026.5.18
  7. OpenClaw: Combined POSIX shell options could confuse exec revalidation
    Hoch · 8.8 CVE-2026-53806 < 2026.5.12 2026.5.12
  8. OpenClaw: Fake package roots could influence memory-core artifact loading
    Hoch · 7.8 CVE-2026-53813 < 2026.4.25 2026.4.25
  9. OpenClaw: Workspace .env could override Homebrew executable selection for skill install flows
    Hoch · 8.8 CVE-2026-53819 < 2026.5.27 2026.5.27
  10. OpenClaw: QQBot pre-dispatch slash commands could skip allowFrom checks
    Hoch · 7.5 CVE-2026-53834 < 2026.4.27 2026.4.27
  11. OpenClaw: Non-owner chat senders could issue device-pairing bootstrap codes
    Hoch · 8.3 CVE-2026-32905 < 2026.5.4 2026.5.4
  12. OpenClaw: QQBot admin commands could skip DM-only and allowFrom policy
    Kritisch CVE-2026-34507 < 2026.4.29 2026.4.29
  13. OpenClaw: Trusted-proxy Control UI WebSocket accepted client-declared scopes before pairing
    Hoch · 8.8 CVE-2026-53821 < 2026.5.18 2026.5.18
  14. OpenClaw: Slack allowFrom could bind to mutable display names
    Hoch CVE-2026-53823 < 2026.5.3 2026.5.3
  15. OpenClaw: QQBot streaming command could mutate config without explicit allowFrom
    Hoch · 7.7 CVE-2026-53833 < 2026.4.29 2026.4.29
  16. OpenClaw: Scoped chat.send route inheritance could bypass admin command scope gates
    Hoch · 8.8 CVE-2026-35674 < 2026.5.18 2026.5.18
  17. OpenClaw's POSIX node system.run safe-bin allowlist could be widened by shell expansion
    Hoch · 7.1 CVE-2026-53831 < 2026.5.18 2026.5.18
  18. OpenClaw: QQBot native approval buttons did not enforce configured approver identity
    Hoch · 8.0 CVE-2026-35630 < 2026.5.18 2026.5.18
  19. OpenClaw: Hook-triggered CLI runs could receive owner MCP tool authority
    Hoch · 8.4 CVE-2026-53814 < 2026.5.20 2026.5.20
  20. OpenClaw: Control UI locality spoofing could mint a durable admin device token
    Hoch · 8.0 CVE-2026-53817 < 2026.5.22 2026.5.22
  21. OpenClaw: Same-host trusted-proxy deployments could accept local forged identity headers
    Hoch · 7.7 CVE-2026-53832 < 2026.5.18 2026.5.18
  22. OpenClaw's marketplace runtime extension metadata could point at unscanned payloads
    Hoch · 8.8 CVE-2026-53810 < 2026.5.18 2026.5.18
  23. OpenClaw: Shell wrapper argv could change between approval and execution
    Hoch CVE-2026-53822 < 2026.5.18 2026.5.18
  24. OpenClaw: Exec approval display truncation could hide the command being approved
    Hoch · 8.0 CVE-2026-53829 < 2026.5.18 2026.5.18
  25. OpenClaw: Message read actions could skip channel allowlist checks
    Hoch · 6.5 CVE-2026-53815 < 2026.5.19 2026.5.19
  26. OpenClaw: Workspace-derived service PATH could influence trash command selection
    Hoch · 7.1 CVE-2026-53865 < 2026.5.2 2026.5.2
  27. OpenClaw: Workspace .env STATE_DIRECTORY could influence bundled runtime dependency roots
    Hoch · 7.1 CVE-2026-53858 < 2026.5.2 2026.5.2
  28. OpenClaw: Discord allowFrom could bind to mutable display names
    Hoch · 8.1 CVE-2026-53849 < 2026.5.7 2026.5.7
  29. OpenClaw: Workspace .env npm_execpath could influence bundled runtime dependency install
    Hoch · 7.1 CVE-2026-53846 < 2026.4.29 2026.4.29
  30. OpenClaw: Linux and macOS exec allowlists skipped configured argument patterns
    Hoch · 7.1 CVE-2026-53853 < 2026.5.12 2026.5.12
  31. OpenClaw: Zalo allowFrom could bind to mutable display names
    Hoch · 8.1 CVE-2026-53857 < 2026.5.3 2026.5.3
  32. OpenClaw: Shell positional parameters could weaken strict inline-eval checks
    Hoch · 8.1 CVE-2026-53855 < 2026.4.2 2026.4.2
  33. OpenClaw: Workspace .env CLOUDSDK_PYTHON could influence Gmail setup gcloud execution
    Hoch · 7.1 CVE-2026-53842 < 2026.5.2 2026.5.2
  34. OpenClaw: Shell inline-command parsing could miss an allowlist check
    Hoch · 8.1 CVE-2026-53866 < 2026.5.12 2026.5.12
  35. OpenClaw: Pairing-scoped device session could restore revoked node token authority
    Hoch · 8.8 CVE-2026-53843 < 2026.5.26 2026.5.26
  36. OpenClaw: Host environment sanitizer missed two Node.js control variables
    Hoch · 8.1 CVE-2026-53864 < 2026.5.26 2026.5.26
  37. OpenClaw: MCP Streamable HTTP redirects could forward configured custom headers to another origin
    Hoch · 7.1 CVE-2026-53840 < 2026.5.12 2026.5.12
  38. OpenClaw's gateway config mutation guard allowed unsafe model-driven config writes
    Hoch · 8.8 CVE-2026-45006 < 2026.4.23 2026.4.23
  39. OpenClaw vulnerable to arbitrary code execution via attacker-controlled setup-api.js loaded from cwd during env-key resolution
    Hoch · 7.8 CVE-2026-45004 < 2026.4.23 2026.4.23
  40. OpenClaw: MCP loopback owner context is derived from server-issued bearer tokens
    Hoch · 7.8 CVE-2026-44118 < 2026.4.22 2026.4.22
  41. OpenClaw: Workspace dotenv could override runtime-control environment variables
    Hoch · 7.8 CVE-2026-44114 < 2026.4.20 2026.4.20
  42. OpenClaw: Feishu webhook and card-action validation now fail closed
    Kritisch · 9.8 CVE-2026-44109 < 2026.4.15 2026.4.15
  43. OpenClaw: Gateway HTTP endpoints re-resolve bearer auth after SecretRef rotation
    Kritisch · 8.1 CVE-2026-43585 < 2026.4.15 2026.4.15
  44. OpenClaw: QQBot media tags could read arbitrary local files through reply text
    Hoch CVE-2026-43533 < 2026.4.10 2026.4.10
  45. OpenClaw: busybox and toybox applet execution weakened exec approval binding
    Hoch · 8.8 CVE-2026-43530 >= 2026.2.23, < 2026.4.12 2026.4.12
  46. OpenClaw: Matrix profile config persistence was reachable from operator.write message tools
    Hoch · 6.5 CVE-2026-42433 < 2026.4.10 2026.4.10
  47. OpenClaw: Sandboxed agents could escape exec routing via host=node override
    Hoch · 8.8 CVE-2026-42434 >= 2026.4.5, < 2026.4.10 2026.4.10
  48. OpenClaw: Workspace provider auth choices could auto-enable untrusted provider plugins
    Hoch · 8.8 CVE-2026-43569 < 2026.4.9 2026.4.9
  49. OpenClaw: Sandbox browser CDP relay could expose DevTools protocol on 0.0.0.0
    Hoch CVE-2026-43581 < 2026.4.10 2026.4.10
  50. OpenClaw: Channel setup catalog lookups could include untrusted workspace plugin shadows
    Hoch · 8.8 CVE-2026-43571 < 2026.4.10 2026.4.10
  51. OpenClaw: Exec environment denylist missed high-risk interpreter startup variables
    Hoch · 8.8 CVE-2026-43584 < 2026.4.10 2026.4.10
  52. OpenClaw: Voice-call realtime WebSocket accepted oversized frames
    Hoch · 7.5 CVE-2026-42437 >= 2026.4.9, < 2026.4.10 2026.4.10
  53. OpenClaw: config.get redaction bypass through sourceConfig and runtimeConfig aliases
    Hoch CVE-2026-43528 < 2026.4.14 2026.4.14
  54. OpenClaw vulnerable to SSRF in src/agents/tools/web-fetch.ts dieser Eintrag
    Niedrig · 5.6 CVE-2026-6011 < 2026.1.29 2026.1.29
  55. OpenClaw: `fetchWithSsrFGuard` replays unsafe request bodies across cross-origin redirects
    Hoch CVE-2026-40037 < 2026.4.8 2026.4.8
  56. OpenClaw: Node Pairing Reconnect Command Escalation Bypasses operator.admin Scope Requirement
    Hoch · 7.8 CVE-2026-42432 < 2026.4.8 2026.4.8
  57. OpenClaw: HGRCPATH, CARGO_BUILD_RUSTC_WRAPPER, RUSTC_WRAPPER, and MAKEFLAGS missing from exec env denylist — RCE via build tool env injection (GHSA-cm8v-2vh9-cxf3 class)
    Hoch CVE-2026-42427 < 2026.4.8 2026.4.8
  58. OpenClaw: Authenticated `/hooks/wake` and mapped `wake` payloads are promoted into the trusted `System:` prompt channel
    Hoch ghsa-jf56-mccx-5f3f < 2026.4.8 2026.4.8
  59. OpenClaw: Lower-trust background runtime output is injected into trusted `System:` events, and local async exec completion misses the intended `exec-event` downgrade
    Hoch ghsa-gfmx-pph7-g46x < 2026.4.8 2026.4.8
  60. OpenClaw: Gateway operator.write Can Reach Admin-Class Telegram Config and Cron Persistence via send
    Hoch · 7.1 CVE-2026-41359 < 2026.3.28 2026.3.28
Mehr anzeigen (20) 60 von 236 angezeigt

Erkennen Sie Schwachstellen in Ihrer Anwendung

Mit der DockRay-Integration und aktivierter Softwareinventarisierung prüft DockRay gemeldete Komponentenversionen auf bekannte Schwachstellen und benachrichtigt Sie über bestätigte Treffer. Die Abdeckung hängt von der unterstützten Technologie und den verfügbaren Meldungen ab.

Anwendung verbinden
DockRay Newsletter

Anwendungssicherheit in Ihrem Postfach

Wichtige Schwachstellen, konkrete Empfehlungen und praktische Tipps für Ihre Anwendungen. Wählen Sie Ihre Technologien und verfolgen Sie, was für Ihr Projekt relevant ist.

  • Eine tägliche Zusammenfassung neuer Schwachstellen, auch kritischer.
  • Benachrichtigungen über wichtige Updates.
  • Praktische Tipps zur Sicherheit und Überwachung von Anwendungen.

Leer lassen, um Meldungen zu allen Technologien zu erhalten.

Datenschutzerklärung

Kostenlos anmelden. In jeder E-Mail mit einem Klick abmelden.